IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i8p272-d399276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Completeness of Spatial Data Infrastructure in the Context of Cadastral Data Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Trystuła

    (Department of Land Management and Geographic Information Systems, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Dudzińska

    (Department of Land Management and Geographic Information Systems, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Ryszard Źróbek

    (Department of Land Management and Geographic Information Systems, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

The idea behind the Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe (INSPIRE) project was to provide EU citizens with access to various types of information, including environmental protection and spatial management data. These resources can be viewed (Web Map Service—WMS) and downloaded (Web Feature Service—WFS) online. Cadastral datasets represent one of the 34 spatial data themes in the spatial data infrastructure (SDI). The functionality of the SDI has not yet been fully achieved due to the failure of the WMS and WFS network services. The aim of this article was to assess the completeness of the SDI containing cadastral datasets. The present study has practical implications. The proposed diagnostic tool supports an assessment of the completeness of SDI resources in seven diagnostic groups (technical and legal identifiers, the cadastral information profile, the WMS network service, the WFS network service, source cadastral databases, data validity, and WMS and WFS standardization). The developed assessment methodology enables the identification of websites that publish cadastral data through INSPIRE network services, as well as problematic websites, and it has high development potential. The results of the assessment should be used in the ongoing construction of the SDI. They can also be used to improve the quality of network services and their availability for end users.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Trystuła & Małgorzata Dudzińska & Ryszard Źróbek, 2020. "Evaluation of the Completeness of Spatial Data Infrastructure in the Context of Cadastral Data Sharing," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:8:p:272-:d:399276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/8/272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/8/272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "A methodological evaluation of the Polish cadastral system based on the global cadastral model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 59-72.
    2. Bennett, Rohan Mark & Pickering, M. & Sargent, J., 2019. "Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 435-448.
    3. Kocur-Bera, Katarzyna, 2019. "Data compatibility between the Land and Building Cadaster (LBC) and the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) in the context of area-based payments: A case study in the Polish Region of Warmia and ," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 370-379.
    4. Aydinoglu, Arif Cagdas & Bovkir, Rabia, 2017. "Generic land registry and cadastre data model supporting interoperability based on international standards for Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 59-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of the Urban Cadastral System in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Przewięźlikowska, Anna, 2020. "Legal aspects of synchronising data on real property location in polish cadastre and land and mortgage register," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2021. "A reformative framework for processes from building permit issuing to property ownership in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Abdurahman Yasin Yiğit & Seda Nur Gamze Hamal & Murat Yakar & Ali Ulvi, 2023. "Investigation and Implementation of New Technology Wearable Mobile Laser Scanning (WMLS) in Transition to an Intelligent Geospatial Cadastral Information System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Rosemond Owusu Ansah & Zaid Abubakari & Benjamin Quaye & Dimo Todorovski & Chipofya Malumbo & Christiaan Lemmen, 2024. "Navigating the Terrain of Digital Transition: Ghana’s Journey of Developing a Digital Land Information System," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Atazadeh, Behnam & Olfat, Hamed & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Shojaei, Davood & Marjani, Afshin Mesbah, 2021. "Linking Land Administration Domain Model and BIM environment for 3D digital cadastre in multi-storey buildings," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Cieślak, Iwona, 2019. "Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Rohan Mark Bennett & Eva-Maria Unger & Christiaan Lemmen & Paula Dijkstra, 2021. "Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Agnieszka Dawidowicz & Adam Senetra, 2022. "Methodology for Precision Land Use Mapping towards Sustainable Urbanized Land Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Ayelech Kidie Mengesha & Thomas Bauer & Doris Damyanovic & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger & Gernot Stoeglehner, 2022. "Gender Analysis of Landholding and Situation of Female-Headed Households after Land Registration: The Case of Machakel Woreda," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Josip Križanović & Doris Pivac & Hrvoje Tomić & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2021. "Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Jahani Chehrehbargh, Fatemeh & Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Steudler, Daniel, 2024. "Identifying global parameters for advancing Land Administration Systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Rohan Mark Bennett & Jerome Donovan & Eryadi Masli & Kirsikka Riekkinen, 2023. "Land Administration As-A-Service: Relevance, Applications, and Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Josip Križanović & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Development of a Methodology and Model for Land Administration Data Dissemination Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Malgorzata Busko & Michal Apollo, 2023. "Public Administration and Landowners Facing Real Estate Cadastre Modernization: A Win-Lose or Win-Win Situation?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Ameyaw, Prince Donkor & de Vries, Walter Timo, 2023. "Blockchain technology adaptation for land administration services: The importance of socio-cultural elements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Anna Klimach & Katarzyna Bagan-Kurluta & Michał Pietkiewicz & Ryszard Źróbek, 2019. "Legal Regulations Concerning Access to Public Waters—A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Diana Bobikova & Zofia Kuzevicova & Stefan Kuzevic & Ibrahim Alkhalaf, 2022. "Proposal of a New Approach for Protected Deposit Area Registration in Public Administration Information Systems—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:8:p:272-:d:399276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.