IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1919-d1754176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Future Water Resource Risks in the Driftless Midwest from Climate and Land Use Change

Author

Listed:
  • Sagarika Rath

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 E. Blackland Road, Temple, TX 76502, USA)

  • Sam Arden

    (Eastern Research Group Inc., 110 Hartwell Ave., Lexington, MA 02421, USA)

  • Tassia Mattos Brighneti

    (Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark)

  • Sam Moore

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 E. Blackland Road, Temple, TX 76502, USA)

  • Raghavan Srinivasan

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 E. Blackland Road, Temple, TX 76502, USA)

Abstract

Assessing the impacts of future changes in rainfall, temperature, and land use on streamflow and nutrient loads is critical for long-term watershed management, particularly in the unglaciated Driftless Area with steep slopes, erodible soils, and karst geology. This study evaluates the Kickapoo watershed in southwestern Wisconsin to examine how projected climate change and cropland expansion may affect hydrology during the mid- (post-2050) and late century (post-2070). Climate projections suggest temperature increase, wetter springs, and drier summers over the century. Annual average streamflow is projected to decline by 5–40% relative to 2000–2020, primarily due to a 5–15% reduction in groundwater discharge. While land use changes from prairie to cropland had a limited additional impact on streamflow, it increased annual average total phosphorus (TP) by 5.67–10.08%, total nitrogen (TN) by 1.08–2.34%, and sediment by 3.11–6.07%, frequently exceeding total maximum daily load (TMDL) thresholds in comparison to the climate change scenario. These findings suggest that although land use changes exacerbate nutrient and sediment pollution, climate change remains the dominant driver of hydrologic alteration in this watershed. Instead, converting 18% (~290 km 2 ) of cropland to grassland could enhance baseflow (0.84–14%), and reduce TP (30–45%), TN (3–5%), sediment (80–90%), and meeting TMDL 90% of the time. These findings underscore the importance of nature-based solutions, such as prairie restoration, supporting adaptive management to reduce nutrient load, sustaining low flows, and strengthening hydrologic resilience, that support key Sustainable Development Goals. This approach offers valuable insights for other unglaciated watersheds globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Sagarika Rath & Sam Arden & Tassia Mattos Brighneti & Sam Moore & Raghavan Srinivasan, 2025. "Evaluating Future Water Resource Risks in the Driftless Midwest from Climate and Land Use Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1919-:d:1754176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1919/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1919/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marzia Ciampittiello & Aldo Marchetto & Angela Boggero, 2024. "Water Resources Management under Climate Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Budong Qian & Sam Gameda & Xuebin Zhang & Reinder Jong, 2012. "Changing growing season observed in Canada," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 339-353, May.
    3. Darren Ficklin & Iris Stewart & Edwin Maurer, 2013. "Effects of projected climate change on the hydrology in the Mono Lake Basin, California," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 111-131, January.
    4. Terje Aven, 2013. "On How to Deal with Deep Uncertainties in a Risk Assessment and Management Context," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(12), pages 2082-2091, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesko Schulte & Carolina Villamil & Sophie I. Hallstedt, 2020. "Strategic Sustainability Risk Management in Product Development Companies: Key Aspects and Conceptual Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Molina-Navarro, Eugenio & Hallack-Alegría, Michelle & Martínez-Pérez, Silvia & Ramírez-Hernández, Jorge & Mungaray-Moctezuma, Alejandro & Sastre-Merlín, Antonio, 2016. "Hydrological modeling and climate change impacts in an agricultural semiarid region. Case study: Guadalupe River basin, Mexico," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 29-42.
    3. Julie E. Shortridge & Seth D. Guikema, 2016. "Scenario Discovery with Multiple Criteria: An Evaluation of the Robust Decision‐Making Framework for Climate Change Adaptation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(12), pages 2298-2312, December.
    4. Sebastian Zabłocki & Katarzyna Sawicka & Dorota Porowska & Ewa Krogulec, 2025. "Identifying Zones of Threat to Groundwater Resources Under Combined Climate and Land-Use Dynamics in a Major Groundwater Reservoir (MGR 406, Poland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Rubo, Samantha & Zinkernagel, Jana, 2025. "Enhancing the prediction of irrigation demand for open field vegetable crops in Germany through neural networks, transfer learning, and ensemble models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    6. Jeanne Thibeault & Anji Seth, 2014. "Changing climate extremes in the Northeast United States: observations and projections from CMIP5," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 273-287, November.
    7. Evan Kutta & Jason A. Hubbart, 2016. "Reconsidering meteorological seasons in a changing climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 511-524, August.
    8. Quan Mao & Nan Li, 2018. "Assessment of the impact of interdependencies on the resilience of networked critical infrastructure systems," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 315-337, August.
    9. Jesko Schulte & Sophie I. Hallstedt, 2018. "Company Risk Management in Light of the Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Guilong Li & Xuebin Zhang & Alex J. Cannon & Trevor Murdock & Steven Sobie & Francis Zwiers & Kevin Anderson & Budong Qian, 2018. "Indices of Canada’s future climate for general and agricultural adaptation applications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 249-263, May.
    11. Julia Reis & Julie Shortridge, 2020. "Impact of Uncertainty Parameter Distribution on Robust Decision Making Outcomes for Climate Change Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 494-511, March.
    12. Gregory F. Nemet & Laura Diaz Anadon & Elena Verdolini, 2017. "Quantifying the Effects of Expert Selection and Elicitation Design on Experts’ Confidence in Their Judgments About Future Energy Technologies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 315-330, February.
    13. Spencer Wheatley & Benjamin Sovacool & Didier Sornette, 2017. "Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 99-115, January.
    14. von Döhren, Peer & Haase, Dagmar, 2019. "Risk assessment concerning urban ecosystem disservices: The example of street trees in Berlin, Germany," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    15. Monika Blišťanová & Michaela Tirpáková & Jozef Galanda, 2022. "Proposal of Risk Identification Methodology Using the Prompt List on the Example of an Air Carrier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Oduor, Brian Omondi & Campo-Bescós, Miguel Ángel & Lana-Renault, Noemí & Casalí, Javier, 2023. "Effects of climate change on streamflow and nitrate pollution in an agricultural Mediterranean watershed in Northern Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    17. Elaine Wheaton & Suren Kulshreshtha, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability of Agriculture Stressed by Changing Extremes of Drought and Excess Moisture: A Conceptual Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Samantha A. Kerr & Yuliya Andreichuk & David J. Sauchyn, 2019. "Re-Evaluating the Climate Factor in Agricultural Land Assessment in a Changing Climate—Saskatchewan, Canada," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1919-:d:1754176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.