IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i8p1553-d1712036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fusion of Airborne, SLAM-Based, and iPhone LiDAR for Accurate Forest Road Mapping in Harvesting Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelia Siafali

    (Laboratory of Mechanical Science and Topography, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Vasilis Polychronos

    (Geosense, Geoinformatics Company, 570 13 Oreokastro, Greece)

  • Petros A. Tsioras

    (Laboratory of Forest Utilization, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

This study examined the integraftion of airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM)-based handheld LiDAR, and iPhone LiDAR to inspect forest road networks following forest operations. The goal is to overcome the challenges posed by dense canopy cover and ensure accurate and efficient data collection and mapping. Airborne data were collected using the DJI Matrice 300 RTK UAV equipped with a Zenmuse L2 LiDAR sensor, which achieved a high point density of 285 points/m 2 at an altitude of 80 m. Ground-level data were collected using the BLK2GO handheld laser scanner (HPLS) with SLAM methods (LiDAR SLAM, Visual SLAM, Inertial Measurement Unit) and the iPhone 13 Pro Max LiDAR. Data processing included generating DEMs, DSMs, and True Digital Orthophotos (TDOMs) via DJI Terra, LiDAR360 V8, and Cyclone REGISTER 360 PLUS, with additional processing and merging using CloudCompare V2 and ArcGIS Pro 3.4.0. The pairwise comparison analysis between ALS data and each alternative method revealed notable differences in elevation, highlighting discrepancies between methods. ALS + iPhone demonstrated the smallest deviation from ALS (MAE = 0.011, RMSE = 0.011, RE = 0.003%) and HPLS the larger deviation from ALS (MAE = 0.507, RMSE = 0.542, RE = 0.123%). The findings highlight the potential of fusing point clouds from diverse platforms to enhance forest road mapping accuracy. However, the selection of technology should consider trade-offs among accuracy, cost, and operational constraints. Mobile LiDAR solutions, particularly the iPhone, offer promising low-cost alternatives for certain applications. Future research should explore real-time fusion workflows and strategies to improve the cost-effectiveness and scalability of multisensor approaches for forest road monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelia Siafali & Vasilis Polychronos & Petros A. Tsioras, 2025. "Fusion of Airborne, SLAM-Based, and iPhone LiDAR for Accurate Forest Road Mapping in Harvesting Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1553-:d:1712036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Quirion-Blais, Olivier & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Development of a decision support tool for optimizing the short-term logistics of forest-based biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 662-677.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Veisi, Omid & Moradi, Mohammad Amin & Gharaei, Beheshteh & Maleki, Farid Jabbari & Rahbar, Morteza, 2025. "Sustainable forestry logistics: Using modified A-star algorithm for efficient timber transportation route optimization," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Lo, Shirleen Lee Yuen & How, Bing Shen & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Rhamdhani, Muhammad Akbar & Sunarso, Jaka, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis for biomass supply chain: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Prinz, Robert & Väätäinen, Kari & Laitila, Juha & Sikanen, Lauri & Asikainen, Antti, 2019. "Analysis of energy efficiency of forest chip supply systems using discrete-event simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1369-1380.
    4. Mosayeb Dashtpeyma & Reza Ghodsi, 2021. "Forest Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    6. Linmao Ma & Jing Yu & Long Zhang, 2019. "An Analysis on Barriers to Biomass and Bioenergy Development in Rural China Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cognitive Map," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1553-:d:1712036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.