IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1292-d1680938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and Redevelopment of Inefficient Industrial Land in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Hegang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanping Qi

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yinghui Zhao

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Jingpeng Guo

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yuwei Wang

    (School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Resource-exhausted cities face dual crises of economic stagnation and ecological degradation, which is primarily attributable to the inefficient use of industrial land. The redevelopment of industrial land has emerged as a crucial solution to the “resource depletion-urban decline” dilemma. The issue of inefficient industrial land use in resource-exhausted cities is of great significance as it directly impacts both economic development and ecological protection. Therefore, finding effective ways to redevelop this land is essential for the sustainable development of these cities. This research takes Hegang, a representative resource-exhausted city in China, as a case study. A multi-dimensional evaluation framework and an adaptive redevelopment strategy system are constructed in this research. By integrating data related to land use status, land use efficiency, policy constraints, and development potential, a parcel-scale assessment model is established. This model consists of 4 primary indicators and 13 secondary indicators. Through this model, 11.01 km 2 of inefficient industrial land in the main urban area of Hegang is identified. Standard deviation ellipse and kernel density analysis are employed to reveal the spatial pattern of inefficient land. The results show that the inefficient industrial land in Hegang exhibits a pattern of “overall dispersion with localized agglomeration”. It is found that idle and abandoned land are the dominant types of inefficient industrial land in Hegang’s main urban area, accounting for 69.7% of the total. This finding provides a clear understanding of the nature of the inefficient land use problem in resource-exhausted cities. A strategic framework is proposed, which incorporates classified governance, dynamic restoration, and multi-stakeholder collaboration. This framework offers a governance toolkit with both theoretical depth and practical value for resource-exhausted cities. Breaking the locked relationship between industrial land and resource dependence promotes the deep integration of spatial restructuring and sustainable transformation. The findings of this research provide significant scientific insights for similar cities worldwide to address the challenges they face and achieve harmony between human activities and land use. Future research could focus on further refining the evaluation framework and redevelopment strategies based on different regional characteristics and resource endowments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanping Qi & Yinghui Zhao & Jingpeng Guo & Yuwei Wang, 2025. "Identification and Redevelopment of Inefficient Industrial Land in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Hegang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1292-:d:1680938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingye Han & Yan Qin & Heng Zhang & Ginger Y. Ke, 2024. "Public Private Partnership to Brownfield Remediation Projects in China: A Combined Risk Evaluation Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Koroso, Nesru H. & Zevenbergen, Jaap A. & Lengoiboni, Monica, 2020. "Urban land use efficiency in Ethiopia: An assessment of urban land use sustainability in Addis Ababa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Guoqing Cui & Wenlong Zheng & Siliang Chen & Yue Dong & Tingyu Huang, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Pattern Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Inefficient Urban Land Use in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Xin Wang & Xiwen Bao & Ziao Ge & Jiayao Xi & Yinghui Zhao, 2024. "Identification and Redevelopment of Inefficient Residential Landuse in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Ring Expressway Area in Harbin City of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Yongrok Choi & Na Wang, 2017. "The Economic Efficiency of Urban Land Use with a Sequential Slack-Based Model in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Jiang, Yanfeng & Tang, Yu-Ting & Long, Hualou & Deng, Wu, 2022. "Land consolidation: A comparative research between Europe and China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Ananya Roy, 2011. "Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 223-238, March.
    8. Zihan Hu & Min Wu & Dan Yang & Tao Luo & Yihao Tian, 2024. "How Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of the Innovation Bottom? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Rui Jin & Chunyuan Huang & Pei Wang & Junyong Ma & Yiliang Wan, 2023. "Identification of Inefficient Urban Land for Urban Regeneration Considering Land Use Differentiation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Alberto Longo & Danny Campbell, 2017. "The Determinants of Brownfields Redevelopment in England," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(2), pages 261-283, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Jin & Chunyuan Huang & Pei Wang & Junyong Ma & Yiliang Wan, 2023. "Identification of Inefficient Urban Land for Urban Regeneration Considering Land Use Differentiation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Malini Ranganathan, 2014. "Paying for Pipes, Claiming Citizenship: Political Agency and Water Reforms at the Urban Periphery," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 590-608, March.
    5. Qu, Yanbo & Li, Yan & Zhao, Weiying & Zhan, Lingyun, 2023. "Does the rural housing land system reform model meeting the needs of farmers improve the welfare of farmers?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Almeida, Renan P. & Hungaro, Lucas, 2021. "Water and sanitation governance between austerity and financialization," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Ugo Rossi & Arturo Di Bella, 2017. "Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 999-1018, May.
    8. Christine Hentschel, 2015. "Postcolonializing Berlin and The Fabrication of The Urban," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 79-91, January.
    9. Jing Zhang & Shuchen Tang & Yongcun Cui & Aitong Ji, 2024. "Reforming Land Public Interest Litigation in China: Addressing Legal and Practical Barriers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Cao, Kexin & Deng, Yu & Wang, Wenxue & Liu, Shenghe, 2023. "The spatial heterogeneity and dynamics of land redevelopment: Evidence from 287 Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Workineh, Nigatu Amsalu, 2021. "Rezoning prior urban planning period for urban space development in Injibara Town, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Sun, Xueqing & Xiang, Pengcheng & Cong, Kexin, 2023. "Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    13. Anguelovski, Isabelle & Martínez Alier, Joan, 2014. "The ‘Environmentalism of the Poor’ revisited: Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 167-176.
    14. Harshavardhan Jatkar, 2024. "BODIES AGAINST MODERNITY: Politics of Slum Rehabilitations in India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 111-125, January.
    15. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2023. "Land Development Rights, Spatial Injustice, and the Economic Development in Net-Incremental Reduction Regions of Construction Land: Evidence from Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Yunchen Wang & Boyan Li, 2022. "The Spatial Disparities of Land-Use Efficiency in Mainland China from 2000 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Jane Zheng & Xiaohua Zheng, 2022. "Does Public Participation Matter to Planning? Urban Sculpture Reception in the Context of Elite-Led Planning in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Mengqi Wei & Chong Du & Xuege Wang, 2023. "Analysis and Forecast of Land Use and Carbon Sink Changes in Jilin Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Yichi Zhang & Kai Xue & Huimin Cao & Yingen Hu, 2023. "The Non-Linear Relationship between the Number of Permanent Residents and the Willingness of Rural Residential Land Transfer: The Threshold Effect of per Capita Net Income," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1292-:d:1680938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.