IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1167-d1666955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Distribution of Historical and Cultural Resources and Regional Revitalization Strategies in Chungcheong Province, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Byoungjin Kim

    (Department of Architecture, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea)

  • Donghwa Shon

    (Department of Architecture, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea)

Abstract

This study quantitatively analyzed the spatial characteristics of 3425 historical and cultural resources across the Chungcheong region of South Korea and proposed strategies for regional revitalization. Each asset was evaluated on a five-point scale, and spatial patterns were examined using kernel density estimation (KDE), Moran’s I, and Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA). The results show that the historical and cultural resources in the Chungcheong region form significant clusters, particularly in areas such as Boryeong, Seosan, Gongju, and Buyeo, which were historically associated with administrative, Confucian, and Buddhist functions. A Moran’s I value of 0.272 was obtained, indicating statistically significant spatial autocorrelation, and the LISA analysis identified “high–high” clusters as key zones with concentrated high-value assets. This study also revealed mismatches between designated cultural properties and areas with high-value but unrecognized resources, emphasizing the need for more inclusive heritage policies. These findings suggest that historical resources should be understood not as isolated sites, but as interconnected cultural landscapes. This research supports the development of tailored, place-based urban regeneration strategies that leverage cultural heritage as a foundation for sustainable regional identity and growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Byoungjin Kim & Donghwa Shon, 2025. "Spatial Distribution of Historical and Cultural Resources and Regional Revitalization Strategies in Chungcheong Province, South Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1167-:d:1666955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jimin Lee & Kyo Suh, 2021. "A New Index to Assess Vulnerability to Regional Shrinkage (Hollowing out) Due to the Changing Age Structure and Population Density," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Seon-Yeong Choi & Cheol-Jae Yoon, 2025. "Typology of Small- to Medium-Sized Korean Local Cities with Population Decline from the Perspective of Urban Compactness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Donghwa Shon & Seungbum Kim & Nahyang Byun, 2022. "Derivation Method of Architectural Asset Value Enhancement Zones in South Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Steven Miles & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 833-839, May.
    5. Guido Licciardi & Rana Amirtahmasebi, 2012. "The Economics of Uniqueness : Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 12286, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Perucca, 2019. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Cultural City Life: Evidence from EU Cities," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 461-478, April.
    2. Praveen Kumar & Christine Fürst & P. K. Joshi, 2024. "Differentiated socio-ecological system approach for vulnerability and adaptation assessment in the Central Himalaya," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-37, January.
    3. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    4. Kostakis, Ioannis & Lolos, Sarantis & Doulgeraki, Charikleia, 2020. "Cultural Heritage led Growth: Regional evidence from Greece (1998-2016)," MPRA Paper 98443, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ugo Fratesi & Giovanni Perucca, 2018. "Territorial capital and the resilience of European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 241-264, March.
    6. L. E. Limonov & M. V. Nesena & A. A. Semenov, 2020. "Application of Cost-Benefit Analysis to Evaluate the Efficiency of Cultural Heritage Preservation Projects in Historic Towns of Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 530-537, October.
    7. Sophie Yarker, 2018. "Tangential attachments: Towards a more nuanced understanding of the impacts of cultural urban regeneration on local identities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3421-3436, November.
    8. Beatrice Maria Bellè, 2023. "Background Conditions for Revitalisation Processes in the Case of Unused Public Buildings in Italy: An Ostromian Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Hamed Tavakoli & Massoomeh Hedayati Marzbali, 2021. "Urban Public Policy and the Formation of Dilapidated Abandoned Buildings in Historic Cities: Causes, Impacts and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Min Yin & Jiangang Xu & Zhongyuan Yang, 2019. "Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Jane Bryan & Max Munday & Richard Bevins, 2012. "Developing a Framework for Assessing the Socioeconomic Impacts of Museums," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 133-151, January.
    13. Andris Kairiss & Ineta Geipele & Irina Olevska-Kairisa, 2023. "Sustainability of Cultural Heritage-Related Projects: Use of Socio-Economic Indicators in Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    14. Mario Polèse, 2012. "The Arts and Local Economic Development: Can a Strong Arts Presence Uplift Local Economies? A Study of 135 Canadian Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1811-1835, June.
    15. Bonnie Burnham, 2022. "A Blended Finance Framework for Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Falanga, Roberto & Nunes, Mafalda Corrêa, 2021. "Tackling urban disparities through participatory culture-led urban regeneration. Insights from Lisbon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Inês Gusman & Pedro Chamusca & José Fernandes & Jorge Pinto, 2019. "Culture and Tourism in Porto City Centre: Conflicts and (Im)Possible Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Nataša Danilović Hristić & Marijana Pantić & Nebojša Stefanović, 2024. "Tourism as an Opportunity or the Danger of Saturation for the Historical Coastal Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Xueru Zhang & Jie Wang & Wei Song & Fengfei Wang & Xing Gao & Lei Liu & Kun Dong & Dazhi Yang, 2022. "Decoupling Analysis between Rural Population Change and Rural Construction Land Changes in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Doğa Üzümcüoğlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2022. "Urban Waterfront Development, through the Lens of the Kyrenia Waterfront Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1167-:d:1666955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.