IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p563-d791256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconfiguration of Cultural Resources for Tourism in Urban Villages—A Case Study of Huangpu Ancient Village in Guangzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Liying Lin

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Desheng Xue

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

  • Yi Yu

    (School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)

Abstract

In the course of China’s rapid urbanization, rural places are brought into urban areas, forming semi-urbanization. These semi-urbanized sites suggest a dual urban–rural structure in their form and management. With the slowing down of urbanization, the Chinese government adopted heritage tourism to boost the local economy. Local historic buildings and cultural resources were regenerated and restored in this process. This paper aims at examining the role of heritage tourism in blurring the boundary of rurality and urbanity, boosting local economy, and revitalizing the areas with cultural-led development. In this paper, we analyzed the Huangpu Ancient Village’s regeneration process. We argue that the Huangpu Ancient Village integrates local historical and cultural resources to boost the local economy, simultaneously adopting urban renewal and rural revival strategies. This paper contributes to the body of literature addressing villages in urban areas, breaking the duality of urbanity and rurality.

Suggested Citation

  • Liying Lin & Desheng Xue & Yi Yu, 2022. "Reconfiguration of Cultural Resources for Tourism in Urban Villages—A Case Study of Huangpu Ancient Village in Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:563-:d:791256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eliza Sochacka & Magdalena Rzeszotarska-Pałka, 2021. "Social Perception and Urbanscape Identity of Flagship Cultural Developments in Szczecin (in the Re-Urbanization Context)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    3. Steven Miles & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 833-839, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinqu Liu & Yaowu Li & Yongfa Wu & Chaoran Li, 2022. "The Spatial Pedigree in Traditional Villages under the Perspective of Urban Regeneration—Taking 728 Villages in Jiangnan Region, China as Cases," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-36, September.
    2. Hua Zhao & Zongsheng Huang & Caijie Deng & Yuxin Ren, 2023. "The Decorative Auspicious Elements of Traditional Bai Architecture in Shaxi Ancient Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eliza Sochacka & Magdalena Rzeszotarska-Pałka & Grzegorz Nowak, 2022. "Representative versus Natural Values of Public Open Spaces—A Landscape Approach (Szczecin Case Study)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Giovanni Perucca, 2019. "Residents’ Satisfaction with Cultural City Life: Evidence from EU Cities," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 461-478, April.
    3. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    4. Ugo Fratesi & Giovanni Perucca, 2018. "Territorial capital and the resilience of European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 241-264, March.
    5. Sophie Yarker, 2018. "Tangential attachments: Towards a more nuanced understanding of the impacts of cultural urban regeneration on local identities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3421-3436, November.
    6. Tong, De & Yuan, Yuxi & Wang, Xiaoguang, 2021. "The coupled relationships between land development and land ownership at China’s urban fringe: A structural equation modeling approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Beatrice Maria Bellè, 2023. "Background Conditions for Revitalisation Processes in the Case of Unused Public Buildings in Italy: An Ostromian Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Maria Cerreta & Gaia Daldanise & Ludovica La Rocca & Simona Panaro, 2021. "Triggering Active Communities for Cultural Creative Cities: The “Hack the City” Play ReCH Mission in the Salerno Historic Centre (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Jane Bryan & Max Munday & Richard Bevins, 2012. "Developing a Framework for Assessing the Socioeconomic Impacts of Museums," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 133-151, January.
    10. Mario Polèse, 2012. "The Arts and Local Economic Development: Can a Strong Arts Presence Uplift Local Economies? A Study of 135 Canadian Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(8), pages 1811-1835, June.
    11. Falanga, Roberto & Nunes, Mafalda Corrêa, 2021. "Tackling urban disparities through participatory culture-led urban regeneration. Insights from Lisbon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Doğa Üzümcüoğlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2022. "Urban Waterfront Development, through the Lens of the Kyrenia Waterfront Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Kevin T Smiley & Wanda Rushing & Michele Scott, 2016. "Behind a bicycling boom: Governance, cultural change and place character in Memphis, Tennessee," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(1), pages 193-209, January.
    14. Cheng-Yi Lin & Woan-Chiau Hsing, 2009. "Culture-led Urban Regeneration and Community Mobilisation: The Case of the Taipei Bao-an Temple Area, Taiwan," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1317-1342, June.
    15. Ludovico Centis & Ezio Micelli, 2021. "Regenerating Places outside the Metropolis. A Reading of Three Global Art-Related Processes and Development Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Yue Chen & Jianqiang Yang, 2018. "The Chinese Socio-Cultural Sustainability Approach: The Impact of Conservation Planning on Local Population and Residential Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Yi Yang & Tetsuo Kidokoro & Fumihiko Seta & Ziyi Wang, 2023. "Are Local Residents Benefiting from the Latest Urbanization Dynamic in China? China’s Characteristic Town Strategy from a Resident Perspective: Evidence from Two Cases in Hangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-37, February.
    18. Matt Patterson, 2012. "The Role of the Public Institution in Iconic Architectural Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3289-3305, November.
    19. Lizheng Zhang & Yumin Ye & Jiejing Wang, 2022. "Influential Factors and Geographical Differences in the Redevelopment Willingness of Urban Villagers: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Aspa Gospodini, 2009. "Post-industrial Trajectories of Mediterranean European Cities: The Case of Post-Olympics Athens," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(5-6), pages 1157-1186, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:563-:d:791256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.