IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1149-d1663994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Carbon Storage of Tongluo Mountain Mining Area, Chongqing, in Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Ma

    (Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China
    College of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Manyi Li

    (Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China
    College of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Chen Wang

    (Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Hongtao Si

    (Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Mingze Xu

    (Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Dongxue Zhu

    (Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Cheng Li

    (Observation and Research Station of Ecological Restoration for Chongqing Typical Mining Areas, Ministry of Natural Resources (Chongqing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Chao Jiang

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Peng Xu

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuhe Hu

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Surface mining activities cause severe disruption to ecosystems, resulting in the substantial destruction of surface vegetation, the loss of soil organic carbon stocks, and a decrease in the ecosystem’s ability to sequester carbon. The ecological restoration of mining areas has been found to significantly enhance the carbon storage capacity of ecosystems. This study evaluated ecological restoration strategies in Chongqing’s Tongluo Mountain mining area by integrating GF-6 satellite multispectral data (2 m panchromatic/8 m multispectral resolution) with ground surveys across 45 quadrats to develop a quadratic regression model based on vegetation indices and the field-measured biomass. The methodology quantified carbon storage variations among engineered restoration (ER), natural recovery (NR), and unmanaged sites (CWR) while identifying optimal vegetation configurations for karst ecosystems. The methodology combined the high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery for large-scale vegetation mapping with field-measured biomass calibration to enhance the quantitative accuracy, enabling an efficient carbon storage assessment across heterogeneous landscapes. This hybrid approach overcame the limitations of traditional plot-based methods by providing spatially explicit, cost-effective monitoring solutions for mining ecosystems. The results demonstrate that engineered restoration significantly enhances carbon sequestration, with the aboveground vegetation biomass reaching 5.07 ± 1.05 tC/ha, a value 21% higher than in natural recovery areas (4.18 ± 0.23 tC/ha) and 189% greater than at unmanaged sites (1.75 ± 1.03 tC/ha). In areas subjected to engineered restoration, both the vegetation and soil carbon storage showed an upward trend, with soil carbon sequestration being the primary form, contributing to 81% of the total carbon storage, and with engineered restoration areas exceeding natural recovery and unmanaged zones by 17.6% and 106%, respectively, in terms of their soil carbon density (40.41 ± 9.99 tC/ha). Significant variations in the carbon sequestration capacity were observed across vegetation types. Bamboo forests exhibited the highest carbon density (25.8 tC/ha), followed by tree forests (2.54 ± 0.53 tC/ha), while grasslands showed the lowest values (0.88 ± 0.52 tC/ha). For future restoration initiatives, it is advisable to select suitable vegetation types based on the local dominant species for a comprehensive approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Ma & Manyi Li & Chen Wang & Hongtao Si & Mingze Xu & Dongxue Zhu & Cheng Li & Chao Jiang & Peng Xu & Yuhe Hu, 2025. "Impacts of Ecological Restoration Projects on Ecosystem Carbon Storage of Tongluo Mountain Mining Area, Chongqing, in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1149-:d:1663994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1149-:d:1663994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.