IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i9p1748-d1235816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Identification and Change Analysis of Production-Living-Ecological Space Using Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study in Jiaodong Peninsula, China

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyan Ni

    (School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yindi Zhao

    (School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Caihong Ma

    (Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Wenzhi Jiang

    (School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yanmei Xie

    (School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Xiaolin Hou

    (School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

Abstract

The significant heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of point of interest (POI) data, the absence of human socio-economic activity information in remote sensing images (RSI), and the high cost of land use (LU) data acquisition restrict their application in PLES spatial identification. Utilizing easily accessible data for detailed spatial identification of PLES remains an urgent challenge, especially when selecting a study area that encompasses both urban built-up areas (UBUA) and non-urban built-up areas (NUBUA). To address this issue, we proposed a PLES spatial identification method that combines POI data and land cover (LC) data in this paper. The proposed method first classified spatial analysis units (SAUs) into agricultural production space (APS), ecological space (ES), and ambiguous space (AS) based on the rich surface physical information from LC data. Subsequently, the AS was further classified into living space (LS) and non-agricultural production space (NAPS) based on the rich human socioeconomic information from POI data. For the AS that contains no POI, a simple rule was established to differentiate it into LS or NAPS. The effectiveness of the method was verified by accuracy evaluation and visual comparison. Applying the method to the Jiaodong Peninsula, we identified the PLES of the Jiaodong Peninsula for 2018 and 2022, further explored their spatial distribution characteristics, and analyzed their changes. Finally, we conducted a discussion on the real-world situations and driving mechanisms of the PLES changes and proposed several policy insights. The results indicated that both the spatial distribution characteristics of PLES and PLES change in the Jiaodong Peninsula were obvious and showed significant differentiation between UBUA and NUBUA. Climatic and natural resource conditions, geographic location, macro-policies, and governmental behaviors drove the PLES changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyan Ni & Yindi Zhao & Caihong Ma & Wenzhi Jiang & Yanmei Xie & Xiaolin Hou, 2023. "Spatial Identification and Change Analysis of Production-Living-Ecological Space Using Multi-Source Geospatial Data: A Case Study in Jiaodong Peninsula, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1748-:d:1235816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yves Van Leynseele & Marco Bontje, 2019. "Visionary cities or spaces of uncertainty? Satellite cities and new towns in emerging economies," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3-4), pages 207-217, October.
    2. Tian Liang & Fei Yang & Dan Huang & Yinchen Luo & You Wu & Chuanhao Wen, 2022. "Land-Use Transformation and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Yingxian Deng & Ren Yang, 2021. "Influence Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space Changes in the Urbanization Process of Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Yuan Wang & Wei Tang, 2020. "Universities and the Formation of Edge Cities: Evidence from China's Government‐led University Town Construction," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(1), pages 245-265, February.
    5. Yan Sun & Yuanyuan Chang & Junna Liu & Xiaoping Ge & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Non-Grain Production on Cultivated Land and Its Driving Factors in Coastal China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Shen, Jie, 2022. "Universities as financing vehicles of (sub)urbanisation: the development of university towns in Shanghai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & Lu, Dan & Yan, Jianzhong, 2020. "Evaluating the impact of land fragmentation on the cost of agricultural operation in the southwest mountainous areas of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Yong-sheng Wang, 2019. "The Challenges and Strategies of Food Security under Rapid Urbanization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.
    9. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Mengxue Liu & Hejie Wei & Xiaobin Dong & Xue-Chao Wang & Bingyu Zhao & Ying Zhang, 2022. "Integrating Land Use, Ecosystem Service, and Human Well-Being: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, June.
    11. Chun Fu & Xiaoqiang Tu & An Huang, 2021. "Identification and Characterization of Production–Living–Ecological Space in a Central Urban Area Based on POI Data: A Case Study for Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Mingshu Wang & Ben Derudder & Xingjian Liu, 2019. "Polycentric urban development and economic productivity in China: A multiscalar analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1622-1643, November.
    13. Ying Yang & Yawen Liu & Congmou Zhu & Xinming Chen & Yi Rong & Jing Zhang & Bingbing Huang & Longlong Bai & Qi Chen & Yue Su & Shaofeng Yuan, 2022. "Spatial Identification and Interactive Analysis of Urban Production—Living—Ecological Spaces Using Point of Interest Data and a Two-Level Scoring Evaluation Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Jia-Li Zhong & Wei Qi & Min Dong & Meng-Han Xu & Jia-Yu Zhang & Yi-Xiao Xu & Zi-Jie Zhou, 2022. "Land Use Carbon Emission Measurement and Risk Zoning under the Background of the Carbon Peak: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Hong & Ningli Liang & Haomeng Li, 2023. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” in Changfeng County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Liu, Xingjian & Wang, Mingshu & Qiang, Wei & Wu, Kang & Wang, Xiaomi, 2020. "Urban form, shrinking cities, and residential carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese city-regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    3. Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Lu Zhang & Chuyu Xia & Er Yu & Jiayu Yang, 2022. "Carbon Metabolism in Urban “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Based on Ecological Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Mingshu Wang, 2021. "Polycentric urban development and urban amenities: Evidence from Chinese cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 400-416, March.
    5. N. Yu. Vlasova, 2022. "The Positions of the Largest and Large Cities in Spatial Transformations of Russian Regions: The Case of the Urals," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 299-308, September.
    6. Xiuling Ding & Qian Lu & Lipeng Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Hua Li, 2023. "Does Labor Transfer Improve Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw from Farming?—A Bivariate Probit Modeling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Yingzi Chen & Yaqi Hu & Lina Lai, 2022. "Demography-Oriented Urban Spatial Matching of Service Facilities: Case Study of Changchun, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Kai Li & Zhili Ma & Jinjin Liu, 2019. "A New Trend in the Space–Time Distribution of Cultivated Land Occupation for Construction in China and the Impact of Population Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Yirui Han & Qinqin Pan & Yuee Cao & Jianhong Zhang & Jiaxuan Yuan & Borui Li & Saiqiang Li & Renfeng Ma & Xu Luo & Longbin Sha & Xiaodong Yang, 2022. "Estimation of Grain Crop Yields after Returning the Illegal Nurseries and Orchards to Cultivated Land in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Yishao Shi & Qianqian Yang & Liangliang Zhou & Shouzheng Shi, 2022. "Can Moderate Agricultural Scale Operations Be Developed against the Background of Plot Fragmentation and Land Dispersion? Evidence from the Suburbs of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Rong Wang & Jinlong Wang & Wenhao Chen, 2023. "The Coordinated Development of Ecosystem Services and Farming Household Livelihood Security: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Yan, Siqi & Peng, Jianchao & Wu, Qun, 2020. "Exploring the non-linear effects of city size on urban industrial land use efficiency: A spatial econometric analysis of cities in eastern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Jiejing Wang, 2020. "Urban government capacity and economic performance: An analysis of Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 981-1004, August.
    15. Quanfeng Li & Zhe Dong & Guoming Du & Aizheng Yang, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Use Intensification in Village Settings: A Survey of Typical Chinese Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Yuan, Yuan & Wang, Mingshu & Zhu, Yi & Huang, Xianjin & Xiong, Xuefeng, 2020. "Urbanization’s effects on the urban-rural income gap in China: A meta-regression analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Yang, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Yuemei & Zhang, Xiaoli & Liao, Qin & Fu, Hao & Cheng, Qingyue & Chen, Zongkui & Sun, Yongjian & Ma, Jun & Zhang, Jinyue & Li, Liangyu & Li, Na, 2023. "Unmanned aerial vehicle direct seeding or integrated mechanical transplanting, which will be the next step for mechanized rice production in China? —A comparison based on energy use efficiency and eco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    18. Jinna Yu & Yiming Wei & Wei Fang & Zhen Liu & Yujie Zhang & Jing Lan, 2021. "New Round of Collective Forest Rights Reform, Forestland Transfer and Household Production Efficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Manu Sharma & Sudhanshu Joshi & Sunil Luthra & Anil Kumar, 2022. "Managing disruptions and risks amidst COVID-19 outbreaks: role of blockchain technology in developing resilient food supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 268-281, June.
    20. Weihui Mei & Lorraine Pe Symaco, 2021. "Higher Education for Development: The Role of University Towns in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1748-:d:1235816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.