IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p940-d1642799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Simulation of Landscape Ecological Risk and Ecological Zoning Under the Construction of Free Trade Pilot Zones: A Case Study of Hainan Island, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yixi Ma

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mingjiang Mao

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zhuohong Xie

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Shijie Mao

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Yongshi Wang

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Yuxin Chen

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Jinming Xu

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Tiedong Liu

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Wenfeng Gong

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Lingbing Wu

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
    Intelligent Forestry Key Laboratory of Haikou City, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

Abstract

Free trade zones are key regions experiencing rapid economic growth, urbanization, and a sharp increase in population density. During the development of free trade zones, these areas undergo drastic transformations in landscape types, large-scale urban construction, heightened resource consumption, and other associated challenges. These factors have led to severe landscape ecological risk (LER). Therefore, conducting comprehensive assessments and implementing effective management strategies for LER is crucial in advancing ecological civilization and ensuring high-quality development. This study takes Hainan Island (HI), China, as a case study and utilizes multi-source data to quantitatively evaluate land use and land cover change (LULCC) and the evolution of the LER in the study area from 2015 to 2023. Additionally, it examines the spatial patterns of LER under three future scenarios projected for 2033: a natural development scenario (NDS), an economic priority scenario (EPS), and an ecological conservation scenario (ECS). Adopting a spatiotemporal dynamic perspective framed by the “historical–present–future” approach, this research constructs a zoning framework for LER management to examine the temporal and spatial processes of risk evolution, its characteristics, future trends, and corresponding management strategies. The results indicate that, over an eight-year period, the area of built-up land expanded by 40.31% (504.85 km 2 ). Specifically, between 2015 and 2018, built-up land increased by 95.85 km 2 , while, from 2018 to 2023, the growth was significantly larger at 409.00 km 2 , highlighting the widespread conversion of cropland into built-up land. From 2015 to 2023, the spatial distribution of LER in the study area exhibited a pattern of high-risk peripheries (central mountainous areas) and low-risk central regions (coastal areas). Compared to 2023, projections for 2033 under different scenarios indicate a decline in cropland (by approximately 17.8–19.45%) and grassland (by approximately 24.06–24.22%), alongside an increase in forestland (by approximately 4.5–5.35%) and built-up land (by approximately 23.5–41.35%). Under all three projected scenarios, high-risk areas expand notably, accounting for 4.52% (NDS), 3.33% (ECS), and 5.75% (EPS) of the total area. The LER maintenance area (65.25%) accounts for the largest proportion, primarily distributed in coastal economic development areas and urban–rural transition areas. In contrast, the LER mitigation area (7.57%) has the smallest proportion. Among the driving factors, the GDP (q = 0.1245) and year-end resident population (q = 0.123) were identified as the dominant factors regarding the spatial differentiation of LER. Furthermore, the interaction between economic factors and energy consumption further amplifies LER. This study proposes a policy-driven dynamic risk assessment framework, providing decision-making support and scientific guidance for LER management in tropical islands and the optimization of regional land spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixi Ma & Mingjiang Mao & Zhuohong Xie & Shijie Mao & Yongshi Wang & Yuxin Chen & Jinming Xu & Tiedong Liu & Wenfeng Gong & Lingbing Wu, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Simulation of Landscape Ecological Risk and Ecological Zoning Under the Construction of Free Trade Pilot Zones: A Case Study of Hainan Island, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:940-:d:1642799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nianlong Han & Miao Yu & Peihong Jia, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Landscape Ecological Risk Simulation for Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study on the Central Mountainous Area of Hainan Island," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Jian Peng & Minli Zong & Yi'na Hu & Yanxu Liu & Jiansheng Wu, 2015. "Assessing Landscape Ecological Risk in a Mining City: A Case Study in Liaoyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Jinfeng Xie & Jun Zhao & Sheshu Zhang & Ziyun Sun, 2023. "Optimal Scale and Scenario Simulation Analysis of Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment in the Shiyang River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Li & Jiafu Liu & Yue Zhu & Chunyan Wu, 2025. "Assessment of Landscape Ecological Risks Driven by Land Use Change Using Multi-Scenario Simulation: A Case Study of Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Qiming Wang & Kun Yang & Lixiao Li & Yanhui Zhu, 2022. "Assessing the Terrain Gradient Effect of Landscape Ecological Risk in the Dianchi Lake Basin of China Using Geo-Information Tupu Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Di Liu & Xiaoying Liang & Hai Chen & Hang Zhang & Nanzhao Mao, 2018. "A Quantitative Assessment of Comprehensive Ecological Risk for a Loess Erosion Gully: A Case Study of Dujiashi Gully, Northern Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Zeng, Lijun & Guo, Jiaqi & Wang, Bingcheng & Lv, Jun & Wang, Qin, 2019. "Analyzing sustainability of Chinese coal cities using a decision tree modeling approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Sebastjan Lazar & Vojko Potočan & Dorota Klimecka-Tatar & Matevz Obrecht, 2022. "Boosting Sustainable Operations with Sustainable Supply Chain Modeling: A Case of Organizational Culture and Normative Commitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Meirui Li & Baolei Zhang & Xiaobo Zhang & Shumin Zhang & Le Yin, 2023. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Variations of Ecological Risk in the Yellow River Ecological Economic Belt Based on an Improved Landscape Index Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Tian Wang & Xiaodong Chen & Xin Zheng & Yayan Lu & Fang Han & Zhaoping Yang, 2022. "Identification of Priority Conservation Areas for Natural Heritage Sites Integrating Landscape Ecological Risks and Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in the Bogda, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Renata Aguayo Lopes da Silva & Renato Cesar Gonçalves Robert & Thomas Purfürst, 2023. "How Is the Forest Sector’s Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Being Addressed? A Systematic Review of the Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Jian Gong & Jianxin Yang & Wenwu Tang, 2015. "Spatially Explicit Landscape-Level Ecological Risks Induced by Land Use and Land Cover Change in a National Ecologically Representative Region in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Tao Yu & Anming Bao & Wenqiang Xu & Hao Guo & Liangliang Jiang & Guoxiong Zheng & Ye Yuan & Vincent NZABARINDA, 2019. "Exploring Variability in Landscape Ecological Risk and Quantifying Its Driving Factors in the Amu Darya Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Hui Wang, 2021. "Regional assessment of human-caused ecological risk in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone using production–living–ecology analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Peng Tian & Jialin Li & Hongbo Gong & Ruiliang Pu & Luodan Cao & Shuyao Shao & Zuoqi Shi & Xiuli Feng & Lijia Wang & Riuqing Liu, 2019. "Research on Land Use Changes and Ecological Risk Assessment in Yongjiang River Basin in Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. He Gao & Wei Song, 2022. "Assessing the Landscape Ecological Risks of Land-Use Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Xueqing Wang & Zhongyi Ding & Shaoliang Zhang & Huping Hou & Zanxu Chen & Qinyu Wu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Multivariate Correlation Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Ecological Risk in Areas of Overlapped Cropland and Coal Resources in the Eastern Plains, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Shaoqing Wang & Yanling Zhao & He Ren & Shichao Zhu & Yunhui Yang, 2023. "Identification of Ecological Risk “Source-Sink” Landscape Functions of Resource-Based Region: A Case Study in Liaoning Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Yiping Liu & Chengpeng Lu & Jinhuang Mao & Jiaxing Pang & Zhiliang Liu & Muchen Hou, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Importance of Ecological Land in Arid Hilly Cities in Northwest China: A Case Study of the Core Urban Area of Lanzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Yun Liu & Weiheng Xu & Zehu Hong & Leiguang Wang & Guanglong Ou & Ning Lu, 2022. "Assessment of Spatial-Temporal Changes of Landscape Ecological Risk in Xishuangbanna, China from 1990 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Jianying Xu & Feifei Fan & Yanxu Liu & Jianquan Dong & Jixing Chen, 2019. "Construction of Ecological Security Patterns in Nature Reserves Based on Ecosystem Services and Circuit Theory: A Case Study in Wenchuan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Chenyang Wu & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yanan Chen & Chenyu Duan & Jiawei Qi & Zhongshuai Cheng & Zengkai Pan, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Eco-Geological Environment in the Concentrated Mining Area of Mineral Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Quanxi Li & Biao Ma & Liwei Zhao & Zixuan Mao & Xuelu Liu, 2024. "Study on Spatial and Temporal Changes in Landscape Ecological Risks and Indicator Weights: A Case Study of the Bailong River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:940-:d:1642799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.