IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p854-d1634098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualising and Valuing Urban Agriculture for Land Use Planning: A Critical GIS Analysis of Sydney and Neighbouring Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Zeunert

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

  • Scott Hawken

    (School of Architecture & Civil Engineering, University of Adelaide, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide 5005, Australia)

  • Josh Gowers

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia)

Abstract

The loss of a city’s agricultural lands due to land use change through urban development is a global problem, as local food production is an essential green infrastructure for intergenerational sustainability. Like many cities, much of Sydney’s rapid urban development occurs on land previously used for food production. Sydney has one of the highest rates of urban growth among Western cities and a planning strategy that marginalises its agricultural productivity. To better understand and advocate for Sydney’s capacity for food production we explore all available government datasets containing agricultural biophysical capacity using a critical GIS approach. Employing various spatial-data visualisations to contextualise agricultural production, we examine inherent biophysical agricultural capacity in Sydney and comparable regions along the eastern coast of NSW. Our approach interrogates the notion that Sydney’s metropolitan landscape is of low inherent biophysical quality for agriculture, thereby challenging current development and planning orthodoxy and policy. In ascertaining Sydney’s comparative capacity for agriculture we find that, despite current metropolitan planning policy, datasets reveal western Sydney is biophysically well suited for agriculture. Sydney overall is comparable to five of six other coastal regions of NSW and superior to at least two. While acknowledging metropolitan land use complexities that shape agricultural production in practice, we argue for improved critical application and contextual understanding of existing agricultural datasets to better inform future planning policy to advance regional food security and aid long-term sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Zeunert & Scott Hawken & Josh Gowers, 2025. "Visualising and Valuing Urban Agriculture for Land Use Planning: A Critical GIS Analysis of Sydney and Neighbouring Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:854-:d:1634098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Hawken & Christian Isendahl & Keir Strickland & Stephan Barthel, 2025. "Towards intergenerational neutrality in urban planning and governance: Reflections on temporality in sustainability transitions research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(3), pages 435-451, February.
    2. Alex. B. McBratney & Damien Field & Cristine L.S. Morgan & Jingyi Huang, 2019. "On Soil Capability, Capacity, and Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Mcdougall, Robert & Rader, Romina & Kristiansen, Paul, 2020. "Urban agriculture could provide 15% of food supply to Sydney, Australia, under expanded land use scenarios," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. David Ley, 2021. "A regional growth ecology, a great wall of capital and a metropolitan housing market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 297-315, February.
    5. Jelena Živanović Miljković & Vesna Popović & Aleksandra Gajić, 2022. "Land Take Processes and Challenges for Urban Agriculture: A Spatial Analysis for Novi Sad, Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Lawton, Amy & Morrison, Nicky, 2022. "The loss of peri-urban agricultural land and the state-local tensions in managing its demise: The case of Greater Western Sydney, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Scott Hawken & Homa Rahmat & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar & Kefeng Zhang, 2021. "The SDGs, Ecosystem Services and Cities: A Network Analysis of Current Research Innovation for Implementing Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-36, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelena Živanović Miljković & Omiljena Dželebdžić & Nataša Čolić, 2022. "Land-Use Change Dynamics of Agricultural Land within Belgrade–Novi Sad Highway Corridor: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Ryan Cronin & Anthony Halog, 2022. "A Unique Perspective of Materials, Practices and Structures Within the Food, Energy and Water Nexus of Australian Urban Alternative Food Networks," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 327-349, March.
    3. Ahmad, Shakeel & Jia, Haifeng & Chen, Zhengxia & Li, Qian & Xu, Changqing, 2020. "Water-energy nexus and energy efficiency: A systematic analysis of urban water systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Cristiano Franceschinis & Ulf Liebe & Mara Thiene & Jürgen Meyerhoff & Damien Field & Alex McBratney, 2022. "The effect of social and personal norms on stated preferences for multiple soil functions: evidence from Australia and Italy," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(2), pages 335-362, April.
    5. Casanova Enault, Laure & Popoff, Tatiana & Debolini, Marta, 2021. "Vacant lands on French Mediterranean coastlines: Inventory, agricultural opportunities, and prospective scenarios," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Brian Murphy & Peter Fogarty, 2019. "Application of the Soil Security Concept to Two Contrasting Soil Landscape Systems—Implications for Soil Capability and Sustainable Land Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Miriam C. Dobson & Philip H. Warren & Jill L. Edmondson, 2021. "Assessing the Direct Resource Requirements of Urban Horticulture in the United Kingdom: A Citizen Science Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Nardella, L. & Sebastiani, A. & Stafoggia, M. & Franzese, P.P. & Manes, F., 2023. "Modelling PM10 removal in three Italian coastal Metropolitan Cities along a latitudinal gradient," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    9. Anny Mulyani & Budi Mulyanto & Baba Barus & Dyah Retno Panuju & Husnain, 2023. "Potential Land Reserves for Agriculture in Indonesia: Suitability and Legal Aspect Supporting Food Sufficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Raisa Sultana & Scott Hawken, 2023. "Reconciling Nature-Technology-Child Connections: Smart Cities and the Necessity of a New Paradigm of Nature-Sensitive Technologies for Today’s Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Lisha He & Mia M Bennett & Ronghao Jiang, 2022. "The uneven geography of real estate investment by Mainland Chinese state-owned and private enterprises in the U.S.: Local market conditions, migration, and ethnic networks," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 653-675, June.
    12. Saqib, Shahab E. & Kaleem, Muhammad & Yaseen, Muhammad & Yang, Shang-Ho & Visetnoi, Supawan, 2024. "From green fields to housing societies: Unraveling the mysteries behind agricultural land conversion in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Ghosh, Sumita, 2021. "Urban agriculture potential of home gardens in residential land uses: A case study of regional City of Dubbo, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Lida Han & Xi Wu & Peng Tang, 2023. "Does Environmental Decentralization Affect the Supply of Urban Construction Land? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Ahmad, Yazdanian & Zahra, Rahmati & Ali, Cheshmehzangi, 2024. "Transformations in urban gardens: Neoliberal influences and land use conflicts in Shiraz's Qasr al-Dasht Gardens," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Xueling Zhang & Ruoxuan Huang & Yixuan Yang, 2022. "On the Landscape Activity Measure Coupling Ecological Index and Public Vitality Index of UGI: The Case Study of Zhongshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, October.
    17. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    18. Elżbieta Jasińska & Edward Preweda & Piotr Łazarz, 2023. "Renewable Energy Sources in the Residential Property Market, Exemplified by the City of Krakow (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Jessica Denila Villanueva & Jonathan D. Austria & Kendrick Mico Faronilo & Aywin Rosette Sunga-Lim & Enrico L. Replan & Janice B. Sevilla-Nastor & Renante Abuyan & Nicolas Peyraube, 2022. "Effect of Lockdown on Food Security during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines : Two Months after Implementation," Post-Print hal-03775378, HAL.
    20. Robert Newell & Colin Dring & Leslie King & Melissa Hemphill, 2025. "Food System Scenarios in Uncertain Futures: A Case Study on Long-Term Local Food System Planning in Revelstoke, Canada," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:854-:d:1634098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.