IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p852-d1633985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Assessment of Cropland in Typical Grain-Producing Regions Based on Carbon Footprint Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Peipei Pan

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Xiaowen Yuan

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Yanan Jiang

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Yuan Wang

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050024, China)

  • Xinyun Wang

    (School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Yongqiang Cao

    (Academy of Eco-Civilization Development for Jing-Jin-Ji Megalopolis, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China)

Abstract

The challenges of limited cropland resources and ecological degradation in grain-producing areas were addressed in this study within the broader context of China’s ecological civilization and dual carbon goals. An integrated framework was employed, applying the three-dimensional ecological footprint (EF 3d ) model, enhanced by carbon footprint improvement, to assess cropland at the provincial, municipal, and county levels. The analysis indicated a rise in both carbon absorption and emissions, resulting in a carbon surplus. Since 1984, chemical fertilizers have been identified as the predominant source of carbon emissions. Carbon absorption was found to vary distinctly among the four crops. Additionally, carbon fluxes displayed notable spatial and temporal variability. The ecological deficit persisted, showing distinct spatial clustering. Moreover, the cropland ecological footprint breadth (EF size ) was found to exhibit a pattern of decrease–increase–decrease, while cropland occupation remained high. The ecological footprint depth (EF depth ) consistently surpassed the threshold of 1. Spatially, the distribution pattern of cropland EF size was opposite to that of EF depth ; the centroid of per capita cropland EF depth underwent a significant spatial shift. The cropland EF 3d was observed to experience a downward trend, with considerable regional disparities. Furthermore, unsustainable use of cropland was observed across multiple scales. This research provides an empirical foundation for promoting advancing ecological agriculture and sustainable cropland use practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Peipei Pan & Xiaowen Yuan & Yanan Jiang & Yuan Wang & Xinyun Wang & Yongqiang Cao, 2025. "Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Assessment of Cropland in Typical Grain-Producing Regions Based on Carbon Footprint Improvement," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:852-:d:1633985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gong Chen & Qi Li & Fei Peng & Hamed Karamian & Boyuan Tang, 2019. "Henan Ecological Security Evaluation Using Improved 3D Ecological Footprint Model Based on Emergy and Net Primary Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Niccolucci, V. & Bastianoni, S. & Tiezzi, E.B.P. & Wackernagel, M. & Marchettini, N., 2009. "How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2819-2823.
    3. Ke, Xinli & Chen, Jing & Zuo, Chengchao & Wang, Xiaoqian, 2024. "The cropland intensive utilisation transition in China: An induced factor substitution perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Wackernagel, Mathis & Onisto, Larry & Bello, Patricia & Callejas Linares, Alejandro & Susana Lopez Falfan, Ina & Mendez Garcia, Jesus & Isabel Suarez Guerrero, Ana & Guadalupe Suarez Guerrero, Ma., 1999. "National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 375-390, June.
    5. Xianpeng Chen & Xianda Meng & Kai Fang, 2025. "Assessing Land Footprint of Urban Agglomeration and Underlying Socioeconomic Drivers," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Yang Sheng & Weizhong Liu & Hailiang Xu, 2024. "Study on Spatial Differentiation Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of Sustainable Utilization of Cultivated Land in Tarim River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hua Liu & Dan-Yang Li & Rong Ma & Ming Ma, 2022. "Assessing the Ecological Risks Based on the Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model in Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Yisong Wang & Jincheng Huang & Shiming Fang, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of Natural Capital Based on the 3D Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study of the Shennongjia National Park Pilot," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Shuhui Zhang & Fuquan Li & Yuke Zhou & Ziyuan Hu & Ruixin Zhang & Xiaoyu Xiang & Yali Zhang, 2022. "Using Net Primary Productivity to Characterize the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Ecological Footprint for a Resource-Based City, Panzhihua in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Jing Guo, 2022. "Evaluation and Prediction of Ecological Sustainability in the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River Based on Improved Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Jia Xiang & Junjun Niu, 2025. "Ecological Compensation and Comprehensive Zoning of Cultivated Land Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Extended Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model: A Case Study of Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-34, February.
    6. Yening Wang & Yuantong Jiang & Yuanmao Zheng & Haowei Wang, 2019. "Assessing the Ecological Carrying Capacity Based on Revised Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Shanshan Guo & Yinghong Wang & Jiu Huang & Jihong Dong & Jian Zhang, 2021. "Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Land Natural Capital Utilization and Economic Growth: A Case Study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Thomas Kuhn & Radomir Pestow, 2024. "The mathematics of the ecological footprint revisited: An axiomatic approach," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 727-735, August.
    9. Tang, Yuzhi & Wang, Mengdi & Liu, Qian & Hu, Zhongwen & Zhang, Jie & Shi, Tiezhu & Wu, Guofeng & Su, Fenzhen, 2022. "Ecological carrying capacity and sustainability assessment for coastal zones: A novel framework based on spatial scene and three-dimensional ecological footprint model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    10. Laxmi Kant Sharma & Pranjal Aarav & Shweta Sharma & Alok Raj, 2023. "Assessment of environmental footprint using geospatial approach to ascertain the Sustainable Development Goal 2030s of India," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(3), pages 525-552, August.
    11. Yao Lu & Xiaoshun Li & Heng Ni & Xin Chen & Chuyu Xia & Dongmei Jiang & Huiping Fan, 2019. "Temporal-Spatial Evolution of the Urban Ecological Footprint Based on Net Primary Productivity: A Case Study of Xuzhou Central Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Jimuji Wu & Xia Yang, 2024. "Assessment of Ecological Carrying Capacity in Xilingol League Based on Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Lu Wang & Bonoua Faye & Quanfeng Li & Yunkai Li, 2023. "A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Ling Li & Xingming Li & Hanghang Fan & Jie Lu & Xiuli Wang & Tianlin Zhai, 2024. "Quantifying and Zoning Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land in Intensive Agricultural Areas: A Case Study in Henan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Benjamin Leard, 2011. "Joan Martinez-Alier and Ingo Ropke (eds.): Recent developments in ecological economics (2 vols.)," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 161-178, July.
    16. Maria Serena Mancini & Mikel Evans & Katsunori Iha & Carla Danelutti & Alessandro Galli, 2018. "Assessing the Ecological Footprint of Ecotourism Packages: A Methodological Proposition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-37, June.
    17. Ella Furness & Harry Nelson, 2016. "Are human values and community participation key to climate adaptation? The case of community forest organisations in British Columbia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 243-259, March.
    18. Małgorzata Stachowiak & Jerzy Śleszyński, 2002. "How Big Is Ecological Footprint of the Polish Economy?," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 8.
    19. Marco Filippo Torchio & Umberto Lucia & Giulia Grisolia, 2020. "Economic and Human Features for Energy and Environmental Indicators: A Tool to Assess Countries’ Progress towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Jia, Junsong & Deng, Hongbing & Duan, Jing & Zhao, Jingzhu, 2009. "Analysis of the major drivers of the ecological footprint using the STIRPAT model and the PLS method--A case study in Henan Province, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2818-2824, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:852-:d:1633985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.