IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p820-d1631567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Shapes the City? Governance, Resistance, and Urban Regeneration in Sant’Ana Hill

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Gonçalves

    (Centre for Innovation in Territory, Urbanism and Architecture (CiTUA), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Isabella Freitas

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Daniela Arnaut

    (Centre for Innovation in Territory, Urbanism and Architecture (CiTUA), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Urban regeneration in historic city centers often encounters tensions between planning strategies, public expectations, and heritage preservation. This study examines the redevelopment process of Sant’Ana Hill in Lisbon, a site historically occupied by many hospitals now subject to closure and adaptive reuse. The transformation of all this 16-hectare area has sparked significant public contestation, highlighting governance challenges and the role of citizen engagement in shaping urban futures amid socio-political and ecological shifts. Using a case study approach, this research draws on urban planning documents, public debate records, media coverage, and semi-structured interviews to analyze the political, social, and architectural dimensions of the regeneration process. Findings reveal that prolonged decision-making, opaque governance, and inadequate public participation have fueled uncertainty, delaying project implementation and increasing public skepticism. The study argues that inclusive participatory frameworks and transparent governance are essential to mitigating conflicts in urban redevelopment. This research also contributes to debates on urban voids, adaptive reuse, and participatory planning, offering insights into the dynamics of contested regeneration in historic districts. Lessons from Sant’Ana Hill highlight the need for a more integrated, democratic, and heritage-conscious approach to large-scale urban transformation projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Gonçalves & Isabella Freitas & Daniela Arnaut, 2025. "Who Shapes the City? Governance, Resistance, and Urban Regeneration in Sant’Ana Hill," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:820-:d:1631567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elia Apostolopoulou, 2023. "Navigating neoliberal natures in an era of infrastructure expansion and uneven urban development," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 55, pages 113-126.
    2. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard & Emma Colven, 2022. "Market-Induced Displacement and Its Afterlives: Lived Experiences of Loss and Resilience," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(3), pages 753-762, March.
    3. Albert Scharenberg & Ingo Bader, 2009. "Berlin’s waterfront site struggle," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 325-335, June.
    4. Johannes Novy & Claire Colomb, 2013. "Struggling for the Right to the (Creative) City in Berlin and Hamburg: New Urban Social Movements, New ‘Spaces of Hope’?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1816-1838, September.
    5. Elia Apostolopoulou, 2023. "Navigating neoliberal natures in an era of infrastructure expansion and uneven urban development," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 55, pages 113-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hang Ma & Mohan Wang & Jinqi Li & Han Liu, 2025. "Public Space Optimization Strategy Through Social Network Analysis in Shenzhen’s Gongming Ancient Fair," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregor Wolbring & Fatima Jamal Al-Deen, 2021. "Social Role Narrative of Disabled Artists and Both Their Work in General and in Relation to Science and Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    3. Sergio Belda-Miquel & Jordi Peris Blanes & Alexandre Frediani, 2016. "Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 321-339, March.
    4. Ares Kalandides & Boris Grésillon, 2021. "The Ambiguities of “Sustainable” Berlin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Yan Han & He Zhu & Zhe Cheng, 2016. "Culture Sustainability: Culture Quotient (CQ) and Its Quantitative Empirical Application to Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Thomas Borén & Patrycja Grzyś & Craig Young, 2021. "Spatializing authoritarian neoliberalism by way of cultural politics: City, nation and the European Union in Gdańsk’s politics of cultural policy formation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1211-1230, September.
    7. Sören Becker & James Angel & Matthias Naumann, 2020. "Energy democracy as the right to the city: Urban energy struggles in Berlin and London," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1093-1111, September.
    8. Helga Leitner & Samuel Nowak & Eric Sheppard, 2023. "Everyday speculation in the remaking of peri-urban livelihoods and landscapes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 388-406, March.
    9. Jung-Ying Chang, 2019. "State participation and artistic autonomy in creative city making," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 226-243, February.
    10. Danny Mackinnon & Stuart Dawley & Andy Pike & Andrew Cumbers, 2018. "Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1825, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2018.
    11. Gregory James J. & Rogerson Christian M., 2018. "Suburban creativity: The geography of creative industriesin Johannesburg," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 39(39), pages 31-52, March.
    12. Naimah Lutfi Abdullah Talib, 2024. "AGENCY AND POWER OF COASTAL COMMUNITIES: Assembling Micro Infrastructures as Everyday Resistance and Resilience in North Jakarta's Port," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 603-626, July.
    13. Badach Joanna Maria & Stasiak Anna & Baranowski Andrzej, 2018. "The role of urban movements in the process of local spatial planning and the development of participation mechanism," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 22(4), pages 187-196, December.
    14. Lummina G. Horlings & Christian Lamker & Emma Puerari & Ward Rauws & Gwenda van der Vaart, 2021. "Citizen Engagement in Spatial Planning, Shaping Places Together," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Stephan Lanz, 2013. "Be Berlin! Governing the City through Freedom," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1305-1324, July.
    16. Anne Vogelpohl & Tino Buchholz, 2017. "Breaking With Neoliberalization by Restricting The Housing Market: Novel Urban Policies and the Case of Hamburg," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 266-281, March.
    17. Becker, Sören & Blanchet, Thomas & Kunze, Conrad, 2016. "Social movements and urban energy policy: Assessing contexts, agency and outcomes of remunicipalisation processes in Hamburg and Berlin," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 228-236.
    18. Wilhelmus (Michiel) Stapper, Everardus, 2021. "Contracting with citizens: How residents in Hamburg and New York negotiated development agreements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    19. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    20. Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri, 2024. "The political: A view from Jakarta’s kampungs," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 979-987, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:820-:d:1631567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.