IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p792-d1629332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Framework for Coordinated Community Development in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yaqi Gao

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Guang Fu

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Ling Zhu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Tao Xu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Qing Zhang

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Hui Fu

    (School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

Abstract

Sustainable community development is a prerequisite for national parks’ coordinated ecological and socio-economic development. This study analyzes the sustainable development challenges communities face in national parks, including the marginalization of indigenous peoples, the passive role of stakeholders, and insufficient protection of community interests. Using a grounded theory approach and a mixed research method (semi-structured interviews and questionnaires), the development constraints of community residents in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park in China were systematically studied. The research framework identified five core dimensions (economic, social, ecological, institutional, and cultural) and eight major categories that characterize the community’s development dilemma. The analysis revealed systemic problems, including differences in income distribution, limited access to resources, gaps in policy implementation, and ambiguous stakeholder roles. A new framework for coordinated development of national park communities was constructed through multidimensional analysis, and coordinated development strategies were proposed from the five dimensions of economy, society, ecology, institution, and culture. These findings contribute to the theoretical underpinnings of national park governance in China and offer a transferable methodological system for managing nature reserves and national parks worldwide, particularly in achieving a balance between ecological protection and community development needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaqi Gao & Guang Fu & Ling Zhu & Tao Xu & Qing Zhang & Hui Fu, 2025. "A New Framework for Coordinated Community Development in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:792-:d:1629332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Handy, 1993. "Community economic development: Some critical issues," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 21(3), pages 41-64, March.
    2. Novellie, Peter & Biggs, Harry & Roux, Dirk, 2016. "National laws and policies can enable or confound adaptive governance: Examples from South African national parks," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 40-46.
    3. Nakakaawa, Charlotte & Moll, Ricarda & Vedeld, Paul & Sjaastad, Espen & Cavanagh, Joseph, 2015. "Collaborative resource management and rural livelihoods around protected areas: A case study of Mount Elgon National Park, Uganda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fisher, J.A. & Cavanagh, C.J. & Sikor, T. & Mwayafu, D.M., 2018. "Linking notions of justice and project outcomes in carbon offset forestry projects: Insights from a comparative study in Uganda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 259-268.
    2. Barry Ackers, 2024. "EL IMPACTO DE LA CAZA FURTIVA DE RINOCERONTES EN LA RENDICION DE CUENTAS DE UNA ORGANIZACION DE CONSERVACION FINANCIADA POR EL ESTADO(The impact of rhino poaching on the accountability disclosures of ," Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), vol. 9(1), pages 65-81, March.
    3. Belachew Gizachew & Svein Solberg & Stefano Puliti, 2018. "Forest Carbon Gain and Loss in Protected Areas of Uganda: Implications to Carbon Benefits of Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Kazungu, Moses & Zhunusova, Eliza & Yang, Anastasia Lucy & Kabwe, Gillian & Gumbo, Davison J. & Günter, Sven, 2020. "Forest use strategies and their determinants among rural households in the Miombo woodlands of the Copperbelt Province, Zambia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Mawa, Christopher & Babweteera, Fred & Tumusiime, David Mwesigye, 2022. "Livelihood outcomes after two decades of co-managing a state forest in Uganda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Petursson, Jon Geir & Vedeld, Paul, 2017. "Rhetoric and reality in protected area governance: Institutional change under different conservation discourses in Mount Elgon National Park, Uganda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 166-177.
    7. Moses Kazungu & Eliza Zhunusova & Gillian Kabwe & Sven Günter, 2021. "Household-Level Determinants of Participation in Forest Support Programmes in the Miombo Landscapes, Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Rahim Darma & Rahmadanih Rahmadanih & Majdah M. Zain & Riri Amandaria & Mario Mario & Rida Akzar, 2025. "Resilient Rice Farming: Household Strategies for Coping with Recurrent Floods in Tempe Lake, Indonesia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Claudia Múnera-Roldán & Matthew J. Colloff & Jamie Pittock & Lorrae Kerkhoff, 2024. "Aligning adaptation and sustainability agendas: lessons from protected areas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Claudia Múnera-Roldán & Dirk J. Roux & Matthew J. Colloff & Lorrae van Kerkhoff, 2020. "Beyond Calendars and Maps: Rethinking Time and Space for Effective Knowledge Governance in Protected Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Christianson, Anne B. & Montgomery, Rebecca & Fleischman, Forrest & Nelson, Kristen C., 2022. "Exploring wildlife disservices and conservation in the context of ecosystem-based adaptation: A case study in the Mt. Elgon region, Uganda," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    12. Nieves Arranz & Carlos F. Arroyabe & Juan Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe, 2019. "The effect of regional factors in the development of eco‐innovations in the firm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1406-1415, November.
    13. Biggs, H.C. & Clifford-Holmes, J.K. & Freitag, S. & Venter, F.J. & Venter, J., 2017. "Cross-scale governance and ecosystem service delivery: A case narrative from the Olifants River in north-eastern South Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 173-184.
    14. Hussein Luswaga & Ernst-August Nuppenau, 2022. "Non-timber forest products income and inequality status for communities around West Usambara Mountain Forests in Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11651-11675, October.
    15. Hosea Opedes & Shafiq Nedala & Caspar A. Mücher & Jantiene E. M. Baartman & Frank Mugagga, 2023. "How Can Drones Uncover Land Degradation Hotspots and Restoration Hopespots? An Integrated Approach in the Mount Elgon Region with Community Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Khodani Matshusa & Llewellyn Leonard & Peta Thomas, 2021. "Challenges of Geotourism in South Africa: A Case Study of the Kruger National Park," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Nieves Arranz & Marta Arroyabe & Jun Li & Juan Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe, 2020. "Innovation as a driver of eco‐innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1494-1503, March.
    18. R. Y. Alarcón Borges & Ofelia Pérez Montero & Rogelio García Tejera & María Teresa Durand Silveira & José Celeiro Montoya & Dayniel Hernández Mestre & Jorge Mesa Vazquez & Carlos Mestanza-Ramon & Dieg, 2023. "Legal Risk in the Management of Forest Cover in a River Basin San Juan, Cuba," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, April.
    19. Mati Amano Geleto & Gerald Kapp & Elamin Sanjak, 2023. "Coping with local peoples' livelihood dependence on the transboundary Dinder–Alatish National Parks in Sudan and Ethiopia from the Sudanese Perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3099-3121, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:792-:d:1629332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.