IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i3p657-d1616387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Modified Soil Erodibility Factors with the Aid of Pedotransfer Functions and Dynamic Remote-Sensing Data for Soil Health Management

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja Preetha

    (Department of Mechanical & Civil Engineering and Construction Management, College of Engineering, Technology, and Physical Sciences, Alabama A&M University, Huntsville, AL 35811, USA)

  • Naveen Joseph

    (Department of Geospatial Science, Artis College of Science and Technology, Radford University, Radford, VA 24142, USA)

Abstract

Soil erosion is a critical factor impacting soil health and agricultural productivity, with soil erodibility often quantified using the K-factor in erosion models such as the universal soil loss equation (USLE). Traditional K-factor estimation lacks spatiotemporal precision, particularly under varying soil moisture and land cover conditions. This study introduces modified K-factor pedotransfer functions (Kmlr) integrating dynamic remotely sensed data on land use land cover to enhance K-factor accuracy for diverse soil health management applications. The Kmlr functions from multiple approaches, including dynamic crop and cover management factor (Cdynamic), high resolution satellite data, and downscaled remotely sensed data, were evaluated across spatial and temporal scales within the Fish River watershed in Alabama, a coastal watershed with significant soil–water interactions. The results highlighted that the Kmlr model provided more accurate sediment yield (SY) predictions, particularly in agricultural areas, where traditional models overestimated erosion by upto 59.23 ton/ha. SY analysis across the 36 hydrological response units (HRUs) in the watershed showed that the Kmlr model captured more accurate soil loss estimates, especially in regions with varying land use. The modified K-factor model (Kmlr-c) using Cdynamic and high-resolution soil surface moisture data outperformed the traditional USLE K-factors in predicting SY, with a strong correlation to observed SY data (R² = 0.980 versus R² = 0.911). The total sediment yield predicted by Kmlr-c (525.11 ton/ha) was notably lower than that of USLE-based estimates (828.62 ton/ha), highlighting the overestimation in conventional models. The identification of erosive hotspots revealed that 6003 ha of land was at high erosion risk (K-factor > 0.25), with an average soil loss of 24.2 ton/ha. The categorization of erosive hotspots highlighted critical areas at high risk for erosion, underscoring the need for targeted soil conservation practices. This research underscores the improvement of remotely sensed data-based models and perfects them for the application of soil erodibility assessments thus promoting the development of such models.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja Preetha & Naveen Joseph, 2025. "Evaluating Modified Soil Erodibility Factors with the Aid of Pedotransfer Functions and Dynamic Remote-Sensing Data for Soil Health Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:657-:d:1616387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/3/657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tesfa Gebrie Andualem & Guna A. Hewa & Baden R. Myers & Stefan Peters & John Boland, 2023. "Erosion and Sediment Transport Modeling: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Mukhtar Iderawumi Abdulraheem & Wei Zhang & Shixin Li & Ata Jahangir Moshayedi & Aitazaz A. Farooque & Jiandong Hu, 2023. "Advancement of Remote Sensing for Soil Measurements and Applications: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Bor-Shiun Lin & Chun-Kai Chen & Kent Thomas & Chen-Kun Hsu & Hsing-Chuan Ho, 2019. "Improvement of the K-Factor of USLE and Soil Erosion Estimation in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Pooja Preetha & Mahbub Hasan, 2023. "Scrutinizing the Hydrological Responses of Chennai, India Using Coupled SWAT-FEM Model under Land Use Land Cover and Climate Change Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Jiaqi Wang & Jiuchun Yang & Zhi Li & Liwei Ke & Qingyao Li & Jianwei Fan & Xue Wang, 2024. "Research on Soil Erosion Based on Remote Sensing Technology: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, December.
    6. Rhavel Salviano Dias Paulista & Frederico Terra de Almeida & Adilson Pacheco de Souza & Aaron Kinyu Hoshide & Daniel Carneiro de Abreu & Jaime Wendeley da Silva Araujo & Charles Campoe Martim, 2023. "Estimating Suspended Sediment Concentration Using Remote Sensing for the Teles Pires River, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Vijay P. Singh & Ozgur Kisi & Vahid Karimi & Chandrashekhar Meshram, 2020. "Application of Artificial Neural Networks, Support Vector Machine and Multiple Model-ANN to Sediment Yield Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(15), pages 4561-4575, December.
    8. Pooja P. Preetha & Naveen Joseph & Balaji Narasimhan, 2021. "Quantifying Surface Water and Ground Water Interactions using a Coupled SWAT_FEM Model: Implications of Management Practices on Hydrological Processes in Irrigated River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(9), pages 2781-2797, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kieu Anh Nguyen & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang & Kent Thomas, 2019. "Predicting Sheet and Rill Erosion of Shihmen Reservoir Watershed in Taiwan Using Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Eseosa Halima Ighile & Hiroaki Shirakawa & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2022. "Application of GIS and Machine Learning to Predict Flood Areas in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-33, April.
    3. Kieu Anh Nguyen & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang, 2020. "Using Machine Learning-Based Algorithms to Analyze Erosion Rates of a Watershed in Northern Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Yash Agrawal & Manoranjan Kumar & Supriya Ananthakrishnan & Gopalakrishnan Kumarapuram, 2022. "Evapotranspiration Modeling Using Different Tree Based Ensembled Machine Learning Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(3), pages 1025-1042, February.
    5. Pooja Preetha & Jejal Reddy Bathi & Manoj Kumar & Venkateswara Rao Kode, 2025. "Predictive Tools and Advances in Sustainable Water Resources Through Atmospheric Water Generation Under Changing Climate: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Jones Anschau Xavier de Oliveira & Frederico Terra de Almeida & Adilson Pacheco de Souza & Rhavel Salviano Dias Paulista & Cornélio Alberto Zolin & Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, 2024. "Determination of Soil Erodibility by Different Methodologies in the Renato and Caiabi River Sub-Basins in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Bhaskar, Ratikant & Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2023. "Artificial intelligence, machine learning and big data in natural resources management: A comprehensive bibliometric review of literature spanning 1975–2022," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    8. Jihui Fan & Artemis Motamedi & Majid Galoie, 2021. "Impact of C factor of USLE technique on the accuracy of soil erosion modeling in elevated mountainous area (case study: the Tibetan plateau)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12615-12630, August.
    9. Walter Chen & Wu-Hsun Wang & Kieu Anh Nguyen, 2022. "Soil Erosion and Deposition in a Taiwanese Watershed Using USPED," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Tarate Suryakant Bajirao & Pravendra Kumar & Manish Kumar & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Alban Kuriqi, 2021. "Superiority of Hybrid Soft Computing Models in Daily Suspended Sediment Estimation in Highly Dynamic Rivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Walter Chen & Kieu Anh Nguyen, 2022. "The New Island-Wide LS Factors of Taiwan, with Comparison with EU Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, March.
    12. Radhikesh Kumar & Maheshwari Prasad Singh & Bishwajit Roy & Afzal Hussain Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Assessment of Metaheuristic Optimized Extreme Learning Machine and Deep Neural Network in Multi-Step-Ahead Long-term Rainfall Prediction for All-Indian Regions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(6), pages 1927-1960, April.
    13. Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, 2023. "Sustainable Development Agricultural Economics and Policy: Intensification versus Diversification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-4, June.
    14. Ndivhuwo Ramovha & Martha Chadyiwa & Freeman Ntuli & Thandiwe Sithole, 2024. "The Potential of Stormwater Management Strategies and Artificial Intelligence Modeling Tools to Improve Water Quality: A Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(10), pages 3527-3560, August.
    15. Elham Ghanbari-Adivi & Mohammad Ehteram & Alireza Farrokhi & Zohreh Sheikh Khozani, 2022. "Combining Radial Basis Function Neural Network Models and Inclusive Multiple Models for Predicting Suspended Sediment Loads," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(11), pages 4313-4342, September.
    16. Kent Thomas & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang, 2020. "Evaluation of the SEdiment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) Model in the Shihmen Reservoir Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Hugo Rodrigues & Marcos Bacis Ceddia & Gustavo Mattos Vasques & Sabine Grunwald & Ebrahim Babaeian & André Luis Oliveira Villela, 2025. "autoRA: An Algorithm to Automatically Delineate Reference Areas—A Case Study to Map Soil Classes in Bahia, Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-36, March.
    18. Wen-chuan Wang & Yu-jin Du & Kwok-wing Chau & Chun-Tian Cheng & Dong-mei Xu & Wen-Tao Zhuang, 2024. "Evaluating the Performance of Several Data Preprocessing Methods Based on GRU in Forecasting Monthly Runoff Time Series," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(9), pages 3135-3152, July.
    19. Avay Risal & Prem B. Parajuli, 2022. "Evaluation of the Impact of Best Management Practices on Streamflow, Sediment and Nutrient Yield at Field and Watershed Scales," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(3), pages 1093-1105, February.
    20. Valter S. Marques & Marcos B. Ceddia & Mauro A. H. Antunes & Daniel F. Carvalho & Jamil A. A. Anache & Dulce B. B. Rodrigues & Paulo Tarso S. Oliveira, 2019. "USLE K-Factor Method Selection for a Tropical Catchment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:657-:d:1616387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.