IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i1p201-d1570851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism Development of Cultural Heritage Resources Through Conservation Concepts: A Case Study of Ningxia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shengrui Zhang

    (Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Tianyi Hu

    (Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Tongyan Zhang

    (Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Hongrun Ju

    (School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Yingjie Wang

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Cultural heritage resources represent a vital aspect of tourism in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, an area characterized by its ethnic minority heritage. This study innovatively proposes a classification framework for cultural heritage based on the principles of protection and the demands of tourism development. For the first time, it combines kernel density analysis and spatial autocorrelation methods to conduct a quantitative study on the geographical distribution of cultural heritage in Ningxia, covering aspects such as scale, structure, distribution characteristics, and influencing factors. The findings reveal: (1) Religious and Ceremonial Sites: Ningxia boasts the highest number of religious and ceremonial sites, totaling 1741. (2) Geographical Distribution: Resources are distributed in a multicore pattern, concentrated in Longde and Zhongning Counties, while the central and western areas are less rich. (3) Regional Concentration: The eastern region shows a high concentration of resources, contrasting with the low concentration in the north. (4) Influencing Factors: Social factors like GDP per capita, urbanization, and population density significantly affect this spatial pattern, although natural factors like altitude are also important. Consequently, the paper recommends increased government investment in cultural heritage tourism; enhanced integration of heritage tourism between urban core areas and countryside zones; increased investment in the protection and development of cultural heritage in high-altitude and remote areas. These findings aim to promote the sustainable growth of Ningxia’s cultural heritage and offer insights for similar regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengrui Zhang & Tianyi Hu & Tongyan Zhang & Hongrun Ju & Yingjie Wang, 2025. "Tourism Development of Cultural Heritage Resources Through Conservation Concepts: A Case Study of Ningxia, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:201-:d:1570851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/1/201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Wenhao & Ai, Tinghua & Shao, Shiwei, 2015. "The analysis and delimitation of Central Business District using network kernel density estimation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 32-47.
    2. Douglas Noonan, 2003. "Contingent Valuation and Cultural Resources: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 27(3), pages 159-176, November.
    3. Cusin, Julien & Passebois-Ducros, Juliette, 2015. "Appropriate persistence in a project: The case of the Wine Culture and Tourism Centre in Bordeaux," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 341-353.
    4. Armbrecht, John, 2014. "Use value of cultural experiences: A comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 141-148.
    5. Liu, Sheng & Ge, Jian & Bai, Ming & Yao, Min & He, Linying & Chen, Ming, 2022. "Toward classification-based sustainable revitalization: Assessing the vitality of traditional villages," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. David Throsby, 2003. "Determining the Value of Cultural Goods: How Much (or How Little) Does Contingent Valuation Tell Us?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 27(3), pages 275-285, November.
    7. Wright, William C.C. & Eppink, Florian V., 2016. "Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 277-284.
    8. Dan Yuan & Runhan Wu & Dong Li & Lei Zhu & Yaguang Pan, 2023. "Spatial Patterns Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultural Resources in the Yellow River National Cultural Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keigo YAMADA, 2024. "Literature Review of Cultural Heritage Economics - Focus on theoretical research of built heritage - (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 24014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    2. Fátima Espinosa Casero & Luis César Herrero Prieto, 2024. "Valuing cultural heritage through non-monetary scales: A comparison," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-02-2024, Association for Cultural Economics International.
    3. Salvador Saz-Salazar & Ana Navarrete-Tudela & José Ramón Alcalá-Mellado & Daniel Carlos Saz-Salazar, 2019. "On the Use of Life Satisfaction Data for Valuing Cultural Goods: A First Attempt and a Comparison with the Contingent Valuation Method," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 119-140, January.
    4. Patrizia Riganti, 2022. "Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation Applications to Cultural Capital: Does the Nature of the Goods Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Andy Choi & Franco Papandrea & Jeff Bennett, 2007. "Assessing cultural values: developing an attitudinal scale," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 31(4), pages 311-335, December.
    6. Mark Morrison & Christine M Hill, 2017. "Understanding the Non-Market Value and Equity Implications of the Walsh Bay Arts Precinct Redevelopment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(301), pages 302-313, June.
    7. Florian V Eppink & Matthew Winden & Will C C Wright & Suzie Greenhalgh, 2016. "Non-Market Values in a Cost-Benefit World: Evidence from a Choice Experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Aikaterini Koumoutsea & Paraskevi Boufounou & George Mergos, 2023. "Evaluating the Creative Economy Applying the Contingent Valuation Method: A Case Study on the Greek Cultural Heritage Festival," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Aleksandra Wiśniewska & Ewa Zawojska & Andrea Baldin & Joanna Rachubik, 2023. "Reliability of international benefit transfer in cultural economics: Non-market valuation of theater in Denmark and Poland," Working Papers 2023-19, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    10. Bruno S. Frey, "undated". "What Values Should Count in the Arts? The Tension between Economic Effects and Cultural Value," IEW - Working Papers 253, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    11. Sanja Tišma & Mira Mileusnić Škrtić & Sanja Maleković & Daniela Angelina Jelinčić, 2021. "Cost–Benefit Analysis in the Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Project Funding," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Mikołaj Czajkowski & Bartosz Jusypenko & Ben White, 2025. "Breaking New Ground in Heritage Valuation: A Comprehensive Use of Discrete Choice Experiments," Working Papers 2025-11, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    13. David Throsby, 2012. "Investment in Urban Heritage : Economic Impacts of Cultural Heritage Projects in FYR Macedonia and Georgia," World Bank Publications - Reports 17386, The World Bank Group.
    14. Andy Choi, 2009. "Willingness to pay: how stable are the estimates?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 33(4), pages 301-310, November.
    15. Aleksandra Wiśniewska & Wiktor Budziński & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2020. "An economic valuation of access to cultural institutions: museums, theatres, and cinemas," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(4), pages 563-587, December.
    16. Boter, Jaap & Rouwendal, Jan & Wedel, Michel, 2004. "Employing Travel Costs to Compare the Use Value of Competing Cultural Organizations," Serie Research Memoranda 0011, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    17. Andersson, Tommy D. & Lundberg, Erik, 2013. "Commensurability and sustainability: Triple impact assessments of a tourism event," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 99-109.
    18. Bronwyn Coate & Robert Hoffmann, 2022. "The behavioural economics of culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(1), pages 3-26, March.
    19. Douglas S. Noonan & Ilde Rizzo, 2017. "Economics of cultural tourism: issues and perspectives," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 95-107, May.
    20. Aleksandra Wiśniewska & Wiktor Budziński & Mikołaj Czajkowski, 2018. "Publicly funded cultural institutions – a comparative economic valuation study," Working Papers 2018-22, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:201-:d:1570851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.