IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p736-d1400606.html

The Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Bundles in Anhui Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongjian Mei

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Cheng Li

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Jie Zhao

    (School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Belt & Road Institute, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221009, China)

  • Zixuan Li

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Kaiyi Chen

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Xin Huang

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zhiyue Zhao

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Identifying ecosystem service bundles and their long-term evolutionary characteristics is essential for the overall enhancement of regional ecosystem services, as well as the division and management of functional areas, providing a basis for decision-making in formulating ecological and environmental protection policies, as well as regional development planning. Based on land use, remote sensing, and meteorological data obtained from Anhui Province, this study assessed six important ecosystem service functions, including food production (FP), water yield (WY), carbon sequestration (CS), soil conservation (SC), habitat quality (HQ), and landscape aesthetics (LA), at the township scale in 2000, 2010, and 2020. On this basis, the k-means clustering method was used to identify ecosystem service bundles, analyze the spatio-temporal evolution trajectory of service bundles, and explore the driving factors of the spatio-temporal evolution of ecosystem service bundles using GeoDetector 2015 The results indicate the following: (1) At the spatial level, diverse ecosystem services demonstrate pronounced spatial differentiation. The distribution pattern of HQ, carbon fixation, and SC services is generally lower in the north and higher in the south, with areas of high value predominantly located in the western Dabie Mountains and the mountains of Southern Anhui. Conversely, FP services exhibit the reverse pattern, and WY services display a gradual increase from north to south, while cultural services are more dispersed, with areas of high value primarily located in the western Dabie Mountains, the Yangtze River Basin, and other locations. On the temporal scale, WY, SC, and FP services mainly exhibit an increasing trend, marked by a significant increase, whereas other services tend to present a decreasing trend. (2) Anhui Province can be categorized into four distinct types of service bundles: the grain production bundle (GPB), mountain ecological conservation bundle (MECB), urban living bundle (ULB), and core protection bundle (CPB). Ecosystem service bundles exhibit clear spatial differentiation, and identical service bundles demonstrate substantial clustering in space. Between 2000 and 2020, ecosystem service bundles displayed a marked spatio-temporal evolution, with the prevalence of GPBs diminishing, whereas the share of ULBs progressively increased, and the number of MECBs and CPBs remained largely stable. (3) In the spatio-temporal evolution process, the average annual precipitation, the proportion of forest land, and slope constitute the principal natural factors influencing the spatio-temporal evolution of ecosystem service bundles, while the proportion of construction land represents the primary socio-economic factor, with natural factors exerting a more significant influence than socio-economic factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongjian Mei & Cheng Li & Jie Zhao & Zixuan Li & Kaiyi Chen & Xin Huang & Zhiyue Zhao, 2024. "The Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Bundles in Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:736-:d:1400606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/736/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/736/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keiko Sasaki & Stefan Hotes & Tomohiro Ichinose & Tomoko Doko & Volkmar Wolters, 2021. "Hotspots of Agricultural Ecosystem Services and Farmland Biodiversity Overlap with Areas at Risk of Land Abandonment in Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Yang Bai & Thomas O. Ochuodho & Jian Yang & Domena A. Agyeman, 2021. "Bundles and Hotspots of Multiple Ecosystem Services for Optimized Land Management in Kentucky, United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. João Vitor Roque Guerrero & António Alberto Teixeira Gomes & José Augusto de Lollo & Luiz Eduardo Moschini, 2020. "Mapping Potential Zones for Ecotourism Ecosystem Services as a Tool to Promote Landscape Resilience and Development in a Brazilian Municipality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Melanie Feurer & Andreas Heinimann & Flurina Schneider & Christine Jurt & Win Myint & Julie Gwendolin Zaehringer, 2019. "Local Perspectives on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs in a Forest Frontier Landscape in Myanmar," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Zhang & Xinmu Zhang & Shengwei Gao & Xinchen Gu, 2025. "Revealing Nonlinear Relationships and Thresholds of Human Activities and Climate Change on Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province Based on the XGBoost–SHAP Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Ziyi Zhang & Zhaomin Tong & Feifei Fan & Ke Liang, 2025. "How to Achieve Integrated High Supply and a Balanced State of Ecosystem Service Bundles: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wai Soe Zin & Aya Suzuki & Kelvin S.-H. Peh & Alexandros Gasparatos, 2019. "Economic Value of Cultural Ecosystem Services from Recreation in Popa Mountain National Park, Myanmar: A Comparison of Two Rapid Valuation Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Jonmenjoy Barman & Somenath Halder & Jayanta Das & Syed Sadath Ali & Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher & Rukhsana & Mohamed Zhran, 2024. "Sustainable Ecotourism Suitability Assessment Using the Intergraded TOPSIS Model in the State of Mizoram, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Shuhua Liang & Fan Yang & Jingyi Zhang & Suwen Xiong & Zhenni Xu, 2024. "Assessment and Management Zoning of Ecosystem Service Trade-Off/Synergy Based on the Social–Ecological Balance: A Case of the Chang-Zhu-Tan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Can Bülent Karakuş, 2024. "Assessment of ecotourism potentiality based on GIS-based fuzzy logarithm methodology of additive weights (F-LMAW) method for sustainable natural resource management," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 27001-27055, October.
    5. Gimona, Alessandro & McKeen, Margaret & Baggio, Andrea & Simonetti, Enrico & Poggio, Laura & Pakeman, Robin J., 2023. "Complementary effects of biodiversity and ecosystem services on spatial targeting for agri-environment payments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Antonio Santoro, 2022. "Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Tianlin Zhai & Jing Wang & Ying Fang & Longyang Huang & Jingjing Liu & Chenchen Zhao, 2021. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Flow in Ecological Compensation: A Case Study of Carbon Sequestration Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Ning Xu & Haoran Duan, 2024. "Ecological Functional Zoning in Urban Fringe Areas Based on the Trade-Offs Between Ecological–Social Values in Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Jiangning District, Nanjing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, November.
    9. Ning Geng & Xiaoqing Zheng & Xibing Han & Xiaonan Li, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Development: The Impact of Agricultural Productive Services on China’s Low-Carbon Agricultural Transformation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Achilem E. da Silva & Kettrin F. B. Maracajá & André C. S. Batalhão & Viviane F. Silva & Igo M. S. Borges, 2025. "Ecotourism and Co-Management: Strengthening Socio-Ecological Resilience in Local Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Chiara D’Alpaos & Andrea D’Alpaos, 2021. "The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Venice Lagoon: A Multicriteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Feurer, Melanie & Rueff, Henri & Celio, Enrico & Heinimann, Andreas & Blaser, Juergen & Htun, Aung Myin & Zaehringer, Julie Gwendolin, 2021. "Regional scale mapping of ecosystem services supply, demand, flow and mismatches in Southern Myanmar," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Kiros Tsegay Deribew & Yared Mihretu & Girmay Abreha & Dessalegn Obsi Gemeda, 2022. "Spatial analysis of potential ecological sites in the northeastern parts of Ethiopia using multi-criteria decision-making models," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 961-991, October.
    14. Haruhiko Iba & Apichaya Lilavanichakul, 2023. "Farm Business Model on Smart Farming Technology for Sustainable Farmland in Hilly and Mountainous Areas of Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Merari Torreblanca & Flavio Choquehuanca & Javier Martínez & Michael Alfaro, 2024. "Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for Peri-Urban Agricultural and Natural Areas at an Intermediate Scale: A Case Study of Arequipa, Peru," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, October.
    16. Victória Beatriz Soares & Taya Cristo Parreiras & Danielle Elis Garcia Furuya & Édson Luis Bolfe & Katia de Lima Nechet, 2025. "Mapping Banana and Peach Palm in Diversified Landscapes in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest with Sentinel-2," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Agyeman, Domena A. & Ochuodho, Thomas O., 2021. "Factor endowment and structural change in Kentucky forest industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Xue Wang, 2022. "Changes in Cultivated Land Loss and Landscape Fragmentation in China from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Jiangjun Wan & Yi Su & Huanglin Zan & Yutong Zhao & Lingqing Zhang & Shaoyao Zhang & Xiangyu Dong & Wei Deng, 2020. "Land Functions, Rural Space Governance, and Farmers’ Environmental Perceptions: A Case Study from the Huanjiang Karst Mountain Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Flurina Schneider & Mélanie Feurer & Lara Maria Lundsgaard-Hansen & Win Myint & Cing Don Nuam & Katharina Nydegger & Christoph Oberlack & Nwe Nwe Tun & Julie Gwendolin Zähringer & Aung Myin Tun & Pete, 2020. "Sustainable Development Under Competing Claims on Land: Three Pathways Between Land-Use Changes, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(2), pages 316-337, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:736-:d:1400606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.