IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i10p2002-d1765638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Achieve Integrated High Supply and a Balanced State of Ecosystem Service Bundles: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ziyi Zhang

    (School of Surveying and Geoinformation Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecological Process and Information, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Key Laboratory of Mine Environmental Monitoring and Improving around Poyang Lake of Ministry of Natural Resources, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Zhaomin Tong

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Feifei Fan

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Ke Liang

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

Abstract

Ecosystems are nonlinear systems that can shift between multiple stable states. Ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) integrate the supply and trade-offs of multiple services, yet the conditions for achieving high-supply and balanced states remain unclear from a nonlinear, threshold-based perspective. In this study, six representative ecosystem services in Fujian Province were quantified, and ESBs were identified using a Self-Organizing Map (SOM). By integrating the Multiclass Explainable Boosting Machine (MC-EBM) with the API interpretable algorithm, we propose a framework for exploring ESB driving mechanisms from a nonlinear, threshold-based perspective, addressing two key questions: (1) Which factors dominate ESB formation? (2) What thresholds of these factors promote high-supply, balanced ESBs? Results show that (i) the proportion of water bodies, distance to construction land, annual solar radiation, annual precipitation, population density, and GDP density are the primary driving factors; (ii) higher proportions of water bodies enhance and balance multiple services, whereas intensified human activities significantly reduce supply levels, and ESBs are highly sensitive to climatic variables; (iii) at the 1 km × 1 km grid scale, optimal threshold ranges of the dominant factors substantially increase the likelihood of forming high-supply, balanced ESBs. The MC-EBM effectively reveals ESB formation mechanisms, significantly outperforming multinomial logistic regression in predictive accuracy and demonstrating strong generalizability. The proposed approach provides methodological guidance for multi-service coordination across regions and scales. Corresponding land management strategies are also proposed, which deepen understanding of ESB formation and offer practical references for enhancing ecosystem service supply and reducing trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziyi Zhang & Zhaomin Tong & Feifei Fan & Ke Liang, 2025. "How to Achieve Integrated High Supply and a Balanced State of Ecosystem Service Bundles: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2002-:d:1765638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2002/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/10/2002/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pfaff, Alexander S. P., 1999. "What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?: Evidence from Satellite and Socioeconomic Data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 26-43, January.
    2. Peter B. Reich & Kerrie M. Sendall & Artur Stefanski & Roy L. Rich & Sarah E. Hobbie & Rebecca A. Montgomery, 2018. "Effects of climate warming on photosynthesis in boreal tree species depend on soil moisture," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7726), pages 263-267, October.
    3. Feng, Zhe & Jin, Xueru & Chen, Tianqian & Wu, Jiansheng, 2021. "Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Zhongjian Mei & Cheng Li & Jie Zhao & Zixuan Li & Kaiyi Chen & Xin Huang & Zhiyue Zhao, 2024. "The Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Bundles in Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araujo, Claudio & Bonjean, Catherine Araujo & Combes, Jean-Louis & Combes Motel, Pascale & Reis, Eustaquio J., 2009. "Property rights and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2461-2468, June.
    2. Sébastien Marchand, 2011. "Technical Efficiency, Farm Size and Tropical Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazonian Forest," Working Papers halshs-00552981, HAL.
    3. Lina O Anderson & Samantha De Martino & Torfinn Harding & Karlygash Kuralbayeva & Andre Lima, 2016. "The Effects of Land Use Regulation on Deforestation:," OxCarre Working Papers 172, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    4. Sims, Katharine R.E., 2010. "Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 94-114, September.
    5. David López-Carr, 2021. "A Review of Small Farmer Land Use and Deforestation in Tropical Forest Frontiers: Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Livelihoods," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Casey, James F. & Caviglia-Harris, Jill L., 2000. "Deforestation And Agroforestry Adoption In Tropical Forests: Can We Generalize? Some Results From Campeche, Mexico And Rondonia, Brazil," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36466, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Jing Duan & Pu Shi & Yuanyuan Yang & Dongyan Wang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Multi-Scenario Modeling of Ecosystem Service Values: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Chomitz, Kenneth M. & Thomas, Timothy S., 2001. "Geographic patterns of land use and land intensity in the Brazilian Amazon," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2687, The World Bank.
    9. Suzi Kerr & Joanna Hendy & Shuguang Liu & Alexander S. P. Pfaff, 2004. "Tropical Forest Protection, Uncertainty, and the Environmental Integrity of Carbon Mitigation Policies," Motu Working Papers 04_03, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    10. Mary Doidge & Hongli Feng, 2025. "The Role of Anticipated Regret in Farmers’ Land Conversion Decisions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Pascale COMBES MOTEL & Jean-Louis COMBES & Catherine ARAUJO BONJEAN & Claudio ARAUJO & Eustaquio J. REIS, 2010. "Does Land Tenure Insecurity Drive Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?," Working Papers 201013, CERDI.
    12. Araujo, Claudio & Combes, Jean-Louis & Féres, José Gustavo, 2019. "Determinants of Amazon deforestation: the role of off-farm income," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 138-156, April.
    13. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Aravena, Claudia & Castillo, Natalia & Ehrlich, Marco & Taou, Nadia & Wagner, Thomas, 2022. "Agroforestry Programs in the Colombian Amazon: Selection, Treatment and Exposure Effects on Deforestation," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 537, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    14. Doupe, Patrick, 2014. "The costs of error in setting reference rates for reduced deforestation," Working Papers 249497, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    15. Macauley, Molly, 2006. "Ascribing Societal Benefit to Environmental Observations of the Earth from Space: The Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR)," RFF Working Paper Series dp-06-09, Resources for the Future.
    16. Yang Yi & Chen Zhang & Jinqi Zhu & Yugang Zhang & Hao Sun & Hongzhang Kang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Sonia SCHWARTZ & Jean Galbert ONGONO OLINGA & Eric Nazindigouba KERE & Pascale COMBES MOTEL & Jean-Louis COMBES & Johanna CHOUMERT & Ariane Manuela AMIN, 2014. "A spatial econometric approach to spillover effects between protected areas and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Working Papers 201406, CERDI.
    18. Murray, Francisco & Baldi, Germán & von Bernard, Tamara & Viglizzo, Ernesto Francisco & Jobbágy, Esteban Gabriel, 2016. "Productive performance of alternative land covers along aridity gradients: Ecological, agronomic and economic perspectives," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 20-29.
    19. Jingheng Wang & Meichen Fu & Xiangxue Han & Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen, 2025. "Research on Human Needs and the Valorization of Supply–Need Relationships in Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Southwest Karst Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Pfaff Alexander & Robalino Juan & Sanchez-Azofeifa G. Arturo & Andam Kwaw S & Ferraro Paul J, 2009. "Park Location Affects Forest Protection: Land Characteristics Cause Differences in Park Impacts across Costa Rica," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:10:p:2002-:d:1765638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.