IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i1p86-d1317223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Parks Quality Assessment Using Multi-Dimension Indicators in Chengdu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Sining Zhang

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Haoxiang Song

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Xiaopeng Li

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Shixian Luo

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

Abstract

High-quality urban parks are considered an integral part of health resources as they can deliver diverse ecosystem services. However, the quality of parks is not always similar, resulting in different levels and values of the services provided. A systematic and complete assessment frame of urban park quality is limited. From the perspective of landscape architecture and design, this study aims to propose a comprehensive assessment framework of urban park quality based on six dimensions (planning and design, cultural services, complete and various facilities, landscape planting, landscape management, and landscape ecology), consisting of 27 indicators with different weights by using the objective and subjective weighting method. Taking the city of Chengdu, China as a case study, 100 urban parks are studied via field investigation and scored using methods that consist of a category count, existence score, field measurement, experts score, and photo review and recheck (13,589 images). The results reveal the spatial distribution and differences in park quality, including six quality dimensions and five districts, and the proportion of the existing quality elements in 100 parks. Based on the results, the spatial areas (Barren area, Low-quality area, Medium-quality area, and High-quality area) are identified, which leads to the establishment of the improvement strategies of spatial equity regarding multi-quality parks. The results can help improve the assessment index system of urban parks, guide the landscape planning and design of urban parks for sustainability, as well as provide a reference for future environmental and social equity development, so as to provide insight and reference for decision-makers and designers considering the landscape planning and design of parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Sining Zhang & Haoxiang Song & Xiaopeng Li & Shixian Luo, 2024. "Urban Parks Quality Assessment Using Multi-Dimension Indicators in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:86-:d:1317223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/86/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/1/86/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaudhary, Sunita & McGregor, Andrew & Houston, Donna & Chettri, Nakul, 2018. "Environmental justice and ecosystem services: A disaggregated analysis of community access to forest benefits in Nepal," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 99-115.
    2. Depietri, Yaella & Kallis, Giorgos & Baró, Francesc & Cattaneo, Claudio, 2016. "The urban political ecology of ecosystem services: The case of Barcelona," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 83-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biao He & Siyu Wang & Qian Xiong & Zheng Zhao & Yilei Hou, 2025. "Urban Park Planning for Sustainability: Resident Insights from China’s Major Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    2. Wei Liu & Wei Wang, 2025. "A Study on the Assessment of Tour–Art–Learning Quality in Urban Parks from a Child-Friendly Perspective: A Case Study of Shaheyuan Park in Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nápoles-Vértiz, Sonia & Caro-Borrero, Angela, 2024. "Conceptual diversity and application of ecosystem services and disservices: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Natália M. P. de Alencar & Martin Le Tissier & Shona K. Paterson & Alice Newton, 2020. "Circles of Coastal Sustainability: A Framework for Coastal Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Mabon, Leslie & Shih, Wan-Yu, 2018. "What might ‘just green enough’ urban development mean in the context of climate change adaptation? The case of urban greenspace planning in Taipei Metropolis, Taiwan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 224-238.
    4. Rana, Kartika & Goyal, Neha & Prakash Sharma, Gyan, 2018. "Staging stewards of agro-ecosystems in the ecosystem services framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PA), pages 89-101.
    5. Laudari, Hari Krishna & Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Pariyar, Shiva & Pant, Basant & Bhattarai, Sushma & Kaini, Tika Raj & Karki, Gyanendra & Marahattha, Anisha, 2022. "Sixty-five years of forest restoration in Nepal: Lessons learned and way forward," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Kosanic, Aleksandra & Petzold, Jan, 2020. "A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    7. Cuni-Sanchez, Aida & Ngute, Alain Senghor K. & Sonké, Bonaventure & Sainge, Moses Nsanyi & Burgess, Neil D. & Klein, Julia A. & Marchant, Rob, 2019. "The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    8. Ram Prasad Acharya & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Geoff Cockfield, 2020. "An Ecosystem Services Valuation Research Framework for Policy Integration in Developing Countries: A Case Study from Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Schirpke, Uta & Scolozzi, Rocco & Dean, Graeme & Haller, Andreas & Jäger, Hieronymus & Kister, Jutta & Kovács, Barbara & Sarmiento, Fausto O. & Sattler, Birgit & Schleyer, Christian, 2020. "Cultural ecosystem services in mountain regions: Conceptualising conflicts among users and limitations of use," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    10. Langemeyer, Johannes & Calcagni, Fulvia & Baró, Francesc, 2018. "Mapping the intangible: Using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 542-552.
    11. Yuliang Jiang & Yufeng Yang, 2022. "Environmental Justice in Greater Los Angeles: Impacts of Spatial and Ethnic Factors on Residents’ Socioeconomic and Health Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Urban and Suburban Green," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Friedman, Rachel S. & Wilson, Kerrie A. & Rhodes, Jonathan R. & Law, Elizabeth A., 2022. "What does equitable distribution mean in community forests?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Clements, Hayley S. & De Vos, Alta & Bezerra, Joana Carlos & Coetzer, Kaera & Maciejewski, Kristine & Mograbi, Penelope J. & Shackleton, Charlie, 2021. "The relevance of ecosystem services to land reform policies: Insights from South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. Akter, Sonia, 2024. "Climate Resilient Development for Agriculture and Pathways for Gender Inclusivity," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344227, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    16. Bitzer, Verena & Moździerz, Monika & Kuijpers, Rob & Schouten, Greetje & Juju, Denabo Billo, 2024. "Gender and forest resources in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Tatiana Cristina de Castro & Antonio Carlos Castro & Leonardo Silva Soares & Marcelo Henrique Lopes Silva & Helen Roberta Silva Ferreira & James Werllen de Jesus Azevedo & Victor Lamarao de Franca, 2017. "Social and Environmental Impacts on Rural Communities Residing Near the Industrial Complex of Sao Luis Island, State of Maranhão, Brazil," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 249-249, March.
    18. Langemeyer, Johannes & Benra, Felipe & Nahuelhual, Laura & Zoderer, Brenda Maria, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Murali, Ranjini & Suryawanshi, Kulbushansingh & Redpath, Stephen & Nagendra, Harini & Mishra, Charudutt, 2019. "Changing use of ecosystem services along a rural-urban continuum in the Indian Trans-Himalayas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    20. Goyette, Jean-Olivier & Mendes, Poliana & Cimon-Morin, Jérôme & Dupras, Jérôme & Pellerin, Stéphanie & Rousseau, Alain N. & Poulin, Monique, 2024. "Using the ecosystem serviceshed concept in conservation planning for more equitable outcomes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:86-:d:1317223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.