IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i7p1320-d1184014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Construction of Chinese Metropolitan Area from the Perspective of Politics of Scale: A Case Study of Nanjing Metropolitan Area, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Yu

    (School of Politics and Public Administration, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Wei Zhao

    (College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Junjun Zhu

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

The spatial political logic of the construction of Chinese metropolitan areas (CMAs) is unique and complex, involving the interaction of power, spatial production, and the construction of political rationality between multiple scales. Taking the representative Nanjing metropolitan area as an example, we use the “material–organizational–discursive” analytical framework of politics of scale theory to analyze the construction logic of CMAs. This study finds the following: (1) In general, the CMA is a high-quality spatial construction resulting from multi-city negotiation, inter-provincial collaboration, and central–territory linkage, and has generally undergone a process of increasing the power of subjects, nested power relations, frequent scale interactions, and complex interest games; among them, planning is not only a scale tool for competing for power, but also an important representation of the results of multiple power games. (2) In terms of the construction of material space, both the delineation of boundaries and the cross-border connection of infrastructure represent rational thinking and stand as two-way choices of the two power subjects in the MA based on the maintenance and expansion of their own spatial development rights. (3) In terms of organizational space construction, CMAs mainly adopt flexible means, with bilateral and multilateral cooperation at the horizontal level, while there is a certain power inequality at the vertical level. (4) In the construction of discursive space, CMAs have experienced increasing construction significance, escalating scale subjects, and overlapping discourse narratives, and the contrast of power relations has also changed. The contribution of this paper is an expansion of the analytical framework of politics of scale based on the division of spatial dimensions, which provides a new perspective for understanding the construction of CMAs, and also helps us to picture Chinese city–regionalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Yu & Wei Zhao & Junjun Zhu, 2023. "The Construction of Chinese Metropolitan Area from the Perspective of Politics of Scale: A Case Study of Nanjing Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1320-:d:1184014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1320/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1320/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Harrison, 2012. "Life after Regions? The Evolution of City-regionalism in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(9), pages 1243-1259, October.
    2. Enrico Gottero & Federica Larcher & Claudia Cassatella, 2023. "Defining and Regulating Peri-Urban Areas through a Landscape Planning Approach: The Case Study of Turin Metropolitan Area (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Niamh Moore-Cherry & Carla Maria Kayanan & John Tomaney & Andy Pike, 2022. "Governing the Metropolis: An International Review of Metropolitanisation, Metropolitan Governance and the Relationship with Sustainable Land Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Victor Osei Kwadwo & Tatiana Skripka, 2022. "Metropolitan governance and environmental outcomes: does inter-municipal cooperation make a difference?," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 771-791, July.
    5. Neil Brenner, 1999. "Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 431-451, March.
    6. Meng, Meixia & Shang, Yuping & Yang, Yang, 2021. "Did highways cause the urban polycentric spatial structure in the Shanghai metropolitan area?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Seth Schindler & J. Miguel Kanai, 2021. "Getting the territory right: infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 40-51, January.
    8. Lei Li & Chenzi Pan & Shuai Ling & Mingqi Li, 2022. "Ecological Efficiency of Urban Industrial Land in Metropolitan Areas: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Yao, ZHOU & Jiang, CHANG & Shan-shan, FENG, 2022. "Effects of urban growth boundaries on urban spatial structural and ecological functional optimization in the Jining Metropolitan Area, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Yi Li & Fulong Wu, 2018. "Understanding city-regionalism in China: regional cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 313-324, March.
    11. Yu Chen & Anthony G. O. Yeh & Yingxuan Zhang, 2017. "Political tournament and regional cooperation in China: a game theory approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(3), pages 597-622, May.
    12. Kevin R. Cox, 2010. "The Problem of Metropolitan Governance and the Politics of Scale," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 215-227.
    13. Yu Qi & Jinliang Yu, 2023. "Decentralization and local pollution activities: New quasi evidence from China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 115-159, January.
    14. da Silva, Romero Gomes Pereira & Lima, Cláudia Lins & Saito, Carlos Hiroo, 2023. "Urban green spaces and social vulnerability in Brazilian metropolitan regions: Towards environmental justice," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Masaaki Uto & Masayuki Nakagawa & Sophie Buhnik, 2023. "Effects of housing asset deflation on shrinking cities: A case of the Tokyo metropolitan area," Post-Print halshs-03869690, HAL.
    16. Xiuyan Zhao & Changhong Miao, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Simulation of Land Use in Metropolitan Areas: A Case of the Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Tian, Yasi & Qian, Jing & Wang, Lei, 2021. "Village classification in metropolitan suburbs from the perspective of urban-rural integration and improvement strategies: A case study of Wuhan, central China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianren Ge & Yang Yu & Xiaohua Zhong & Yongli Jiao, 2025. "Cross-Provincial City-Regionalism in China: Evidence from Smart Planning and Integrated Governance of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Li Wang & Heng Chao & Guicai Li, 2019. "Diversification and Local Embeddedness: The Rescaling of National New Area Governance in Post-Reform China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2021. "Spatiotemporal effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2022. "The direct and lag effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion patterns in Chinese mega-urban agglomerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. John Harrison, 2014. "Rethinking City-regionalism as the Production of New Non-State Spatial Strategies: The Case of Peel Holdings Atlantic Gateway Strategy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2315-2335, August.
    6. Kristian Olesen & Carsten J Hansen, 2020. "Introducing business regions in Denmark: The ‘businessification’ of strategic spatial planning?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 366-383, March.
    7. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Firoz Alam & Shahid Alam & Mohammad Asif & Umme Hani & Mohd Naved Khan, 2023. "An Investigation of Saudi Arabia’s Ambitious Reform Programme with Vision 2030 to Incentivise Investment in the Country’s Non-Oil Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    10. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    11. Xue, Jin, 2014. "Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner's perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 130-138.
    12. Xiji Jiang & Jiaxin Sun & Tianzi Zhang & Qian Li & Yan Ma & Wen Qu & Dan Ye & Zhendong Lei, 2025. "Defining Rural Types Nearby Large Cities from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Integration: A Case Study of Xi’an Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Neil Lee, 2017. "Powerhouse of cards? Understanding the ‘Northern Powerhouse’," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 478-489, March.
    14. John Friedmann, 2001. "Regional Development and Planning: The Story of a Collaboration," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 24(3), pages 386-395, July.
    15. Lasse Gerrits & Peter K Marks & Sofia Pagliarin & Ward Rauws, 2022. "Strategic archetypes of planning processes: Model and evidence," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(9), pages 2516-2530, November.
    16. Subrata Haldar & Somnath Mandal & Subhasis Bhattacharya & Suman Paul, 2023. "Detection of peri-urban dynamicity in India: evidence from Durgapur municipal corporation," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1223-1259, December.
    17. Yang Zhang & Xiaojiang Xia & Jiandong Li & Luge Xing & Chengchao Yang & Haofeng Wang & Xiaoai Dai & Jue Wang, 2024. "Simulation of Urban Growth Boundary under the Guidance of Stock Development: A Case Study of Wuhan City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    18. John Harrison, 2014. "The rise of the non-state ‘place-based’ economic development strategy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 453-468, June.
    19. Carol Upadhya, 2017. "Amaravati and the New Andhra," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 177-202, August.
    20. Peter Newman, 2000. "Changing Patterns of Regional Governance in the EU," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(5-6), pages 895-908, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:1320-:d:1184014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.