IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1135-d1157547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Conditioning Factors in Cuenca, Ecuador, for Landslide Susceptibility Maps Generation Employing Machine Learning Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Esteban Bravo-López

    (Department of Cartographic, Geodetic and Photogrammetric Engineering, Photogrammetric and Topometric Systems Research Group, Centre for Advanced Studies in Earth Sciences, Energy and Environment, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain
    Instituto de Estudios de Régimen Seccional del Ecuador (IERSE), Vicerrectorado de Investigaciones, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca 010204, Ecuador)

  • Tomás Fernández Del Castillo

    (Department of Cartographic, Geodetic and Photogrammetric Engineering, Photogrammetric and Topometric Systems Research Group, Centre for Advanced Studies in Earth Sciences, Energy and Environment, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain)

  • Chester Sellers

    (Instituto de Estudios de Régimen Seccional del Ecuador (IERSE), Vicerrectorado de Investigaciones, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca 010204, Ecuador)

  • Jorge Delgado-García

    (Department of Cartographic, Geodetic and Photogrammetric Engineering, Photogrammetric and Topometric Systems Research Group, Centre for Advanced Studies in Earth Sciences, Energy and Environment, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain)

Abstract

Landslides are events that cause great impact in different parts of the world. Their destructive capacity generates loss of life and considerable economic damage. In this research, several Machine Learning (ML) methods were explored to select the most important conditioning factors, in order to evaluate the susceptibility to rotational landslides in a sector surrounding the city of Cuenca (Ecuador) and with them to elaborate landslide susceptibility maps (LSM) by means of ML. The methods implemented to analyze the importance of the conditioning factors checked for multicollinearity (correlation analysis and VIF), and, with an ML-based approach called feature selection, the most important factors were determined based on Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Feature Selection with Random Forests (FS RF), and Boruta and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) algorithms. LSMs were implemented with Random Forests (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) methods considering a landslide inventory updated to 2019 and 15 available conditioning factors (topographic (10), land cover (3), hydrological (1), and geological (1)), from which, based on the results of the aforementioned analyses, the six most important were chosen. The LSM were elaborated considering all available factors and the six most important ones, with the previously mentioned ML methods, and were compared with the result generated by an Artificial Neural Network with resilient backpropagation (ANN rprop-) with six conditioning factors. The results obtained were validated by means of AUC-ROC value and showed a good predictive capacity for all cases, highlighting those obtained with XGBoost, which, in addition to a high AUC value (>0.84), obtained a good degree of coincidence of landslides at high and very high susceptibility levels (>72%). Despite the findings of this research, it is necessary to study in depth the methods applied for the development of future research that will contribute to developing a preventive approach in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Esteban Bravo-López & Tomás Fernández Del Castillo & Chester Sellers & Jorge Delgado-García, 2023. "Analysis of Conditioning Factors in Cuenca, Ecuador, for Landslide Susceptibility Maps Generation Employing Machine Learning Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1135-:d:1157547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jules Maurice Habumugisha & Ningsheng Chen & Mahfuzur Rahman & Md Monirul Islam & Hilal Ahmad & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Gitika Sharma & Sharmina Naznin Liza & Ashraf Dewan, 2022. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Deep Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Richard Mind’je & Lanhai Li & Jean Baptiste Nsengiyumva & Christophe Mupenzi & Enan Muhire Nyesheja & Patient Mindje Kayumba & Aboubakar Gasirabo & Egide Hakorimana, 2020. "Landslide susceptibility and influencing factors analysis in Rwanda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7985-8012, December.
    3. Faraz S. Tehrani & Michele Calvello & Zhongqiang Liu & Limin Zhang & Suzanne Lacasse, 2022. "Machine learning and landslide studies: recent advances and applications," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1197-1245, November.
    4. Kursa, Miron B. & Rudnicki, Witold R., 2010. "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i11).
    5. Aihua Wei & Kaining Yu & Fenggang Dai & Fuji Gu & Wanxi Zhang & Yu Liu, 2022. "Application of Tree-Based Ensemble Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Chang-Jo Chung & Andrea Fabbri, 2003. "Validation of Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazard Mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 30(3), pages 451-472, November.
    7. Minu Treesa Abraham & Neelima Satyam & Revuri Lokesh & Biswajeet Pradhan & Abdullah Alamri, 2021. "Factors Affecting Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Assessing the Influence of Different Machine Learning Approaches, Sampling Strategies and Data Splitting," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Vorpahl, Peter & Elsenbeer, Helmut & Märker, Michael & Schröder, Boris, 2012. "How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 27-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheng Ma & Jian Chen & Saier Wu & Yurou Li, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study of Landslides in the Yinghu Lake Basin in Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Gonzalez-Ollauri & Slobodan B. Mickovski, 2021. "A Simple GIS-Based Tool for the Detection of Landslide-Prone Zones on a Coastal Slope in Scotland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Paulo Rodolpho Pereira Hader & Fábio Augusto Gomes Vieira Reis & Anna Silvia Palcheco Peixoto, 2022. "Landslide risk assessment considering socionatural factors: methodology and application to Cubatão municipality, São Paulo, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1273-1304, January.
    3. L. Lombardo & M. Cama & C. Conoscenti & M. Märker & E. Rotigliano, 2015. "Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: application to the 2009 storm event in Messi," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1621-1648, December.
    4. Han Zhang & Chao Yin & Shaoping Wang & Bing Guo, 2023. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide classification and improved convolutional neural networks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1931-1971, March.
    5. Daniela Piacentini & Stefano Devoto & Matteo Mantovani & Alessandro Pasuto & Mariacristina Prampolini & Mauro Soldati, 2015. "Landslide susceptibility modeling assisted by Persistent Scatterers Interferometry (PSI): an example from the northwestern coast of Malta," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 681-697, August.
    6. L. Lombardo & M. Cama & M. Maerker & E. Rotigliano, 2014. "A test of transferability for landslides susceptibility models under extreme climatic events: application to the Messina 2009 disaster," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1951-1989, December.
    7. Batmyagmar Dashbold & L. Sebastian Bryson & Matthew M. Crawford, 2023. "Landslide hazard and susceptibility maps derived from satellite and remote sensing data using limit equilibrium analysis and machine learning model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 235-265, March.
    8. D. Costanzo & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & E. Rotigliano, 2012. "Exporting a Google Earth ™ aided earth-flow susceptibility model: a test in central Sicily," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 103-114, March.
    9. Tong, Jianfeng & Liu, Zhenxing & Zhang, Yong & Zheng, Xiujuan & Jin, Junyang, 2023. "Improved multi-gate mixture-of-experts framework for multi-step prediction of gas load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    10. Huadan Fan & Yuefeng Lu & Yulong Hu & Jun Fang & Chengzhe Lv & Changqing Xu & Xinyi Feng & Yanru Liu, 2022. "A Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Highway Disasters Based on the Frequency Ratio Coupling Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Asma Shaheen & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "Spatial Distribution and Mobility Assessment of Carcinogenic Heavy Metals in Soil Profiles Using Geostatistics and Random Forest, Boruta Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Ramón Ferri-García & María del Mar Rueda, 2022. "Variable selection in Propensity Score Adjustment to mitigate selection bias in online surveys," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1829-1881, December.
    13. E. Rotigliano & C. Cappadonia & C. Conoscenti & D. Costanzo & V. Agnesi, 2012. "Slope units-based flow susceptibility model: using validation tests to select controlling factors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(1), pages 143-153, March.
    14. Ghosh, Indranil & Chaudhuri, Tamal Datta & Alfaro-Cortés, Esteban & Gámez, Matías & García, Noelia, 2022. "A hybrid approach to forecasting futures prices with simultaneous consideration of optimality in ensemble feature selection and advanced artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    15. Kourosh Shirani & Mehrdad Pasandi & Alireza Arabameri, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility assessment by Dempster–Shafer and Index of Entropy models, Sarkhoun basin, Southwestern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1379-1418, September.
    16. Manuel J. García Rodríguez & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Francisco Ortega Fernández & Joaquín M. Villanueva Balsera, 2019. "Public Procurement Announcements in Spain: Regulations, Data Analysis, and Award Price Estimator Using Machine Learning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, November.
    17. Sangjin Kim & Jong-Min Kim, 2019. "Two-Stage Classification with SIS Using a New Filter Ranking Method in High Throughput Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Zhao-Yue Chen & Hervé Petetin & Raúl Fernando Méndez Turrubiates & Hicham Achebak & Carlos Pérez García-Pando & Joan Ballester, 2024. "Population exposure to multiple air pollutants and its compound episodes in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Tahir Ali Akbar & Siddique Ullah & Waheed Ullah & Rafi Ullah & Raja Umer Sajjad & Abdullah Mohamed & Alamgir Khalil & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Anwarud Din, 2022. "Development and Application of Models for Landslide Hazards in Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1135-:d:1157547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.