IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6330-d821644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Tree-Based Ensemble Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Aihua Wei

    (Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Sustained Utilization and Development of Water Resources, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    School of Water Resources and Environment, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    Hebei Center for Ecological and Environmental Geology Research, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Kaining Yu

    (Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Sustained Utilization and Development of Water Resources, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    School of Water Resources and Environment, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    Hebei Center for Ecological and Environmental Geology Research, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Fenggang Dai

    (Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Sustained Utilization and Development of Water Resources, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    School of Water Resources and Environment, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    Hebei Center for Ecological and Environmental Geology Research, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Fuji Gu

    (Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Shijiazhuang 050021, China)

  • Wanxi Zhang

    (Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Shijiazhuang 050021, China)

  • Yu Liu

    (Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Shijiazhuang 050021, China)

Abstract

Ensemble machine learning methods have been widely used for modeling landslide susceptibility, but there has been no uniform ensemble method for this problem. The main objective of this study is to compare popular ensemble machine learning-based models and apply them to landslides susceptibility mapping. The selected models include the random forest (RF), which is a typical bagging ensemble model, and three advanced boosting models, namely, adaptive boosting (AB), gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). This study considers 94 landslide points and 12 affecting factors. The data are divided into a training dataset consisting of 70% of the overall data, and a validation dataset, containing the remaining 30% of the data. The models are evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and three common performance metrics: sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The results indicate that the four ensemble models have an AUC of more than 0.8, suggesting that they can appropriately and accurately predict landslide susceptibility maps. In particular, the XGBoost model achieves the best performance among all models, having a sensitivity of 92.86, specificity of 90.00, and accuracy of 91.38. Furthermore, the bagging model has a sensitivity of 89.29, specificity of 86.67, and accuracy of 87.93, and it is superior to the GBDT, which achieves a sensitivity of 86.21, specificity of 86.21, and accuracy of 86.21, and the AB, reaching a sensitivity of 82.14, specificity of 80.00, and accuracy of 81.03. The results presented in this study indicate that the advanced ensemble model, the XGBoost model, could be a promising tool for the selection of ensemble models for predicting landslide susceptibility mapping.

Suggested Citation

  • Aihua Wei & Kaining Yu & Fenggang Dai & Fuji Gu & Wanxi Zhang & Yu Liu, 2022. "Application of Tree-Based Ensemble Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6330-:d:821644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jules Maurice Habumugisha & Ningsheng Chen & Mahfuzur Rahman & Md Monirul Islam & Hilal Ahmad & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Gitika Sharma & Sharmina Naznin Liza & Ashraf Dewan, 2022. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Deep Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Halil Akinci & Mustafa Zeybek, 2021. "Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1515-1543, September.
    3. Dimitris Kouhartsiouk & Skevi Perdikou, 2021. "The application of DInSAR and Bayesian statistics for the assessment of landslide susceptibility," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 2957-2985, February.
    4. Hyuck-Jin Park & Kang-Min Kim & In-Tak Hwang & Jung-Hyun Lee, 2022. "Regional Landslide Hazard Assessment Using Extreme Value Analysis and a Probabilistic Physically Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esteban Bravo-López & Tomás Fernández Del Castillo & Chester Sellers & Jorge Delgado-García, 2023. "Analysis of Conditioning Factors in Cuenca, Ecuador, for Landslide Susceptibility Maps Generation Employing Machine Learning Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Huadan Fan & Yuefeng Lu & Yulong Hu & Jun Fang & Chengzhe Lv & Changqing Xu & Xinyi Feng & Yanru Liu, 2022. "A Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Highway Disasters Based on the Frequency Ratio Coupling Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Yanrong Liu & Zhongqiu Meng & Lei Zhu & Di Hu & Handong He, 2023. "Optimizing the Sample Selection of Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Information Value Models in the Dabie Mountain Area of Anhui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Txomin Bornaetxea & Juan Remondo & Jaime Bonachea & Pablo Valenzuela, 2023. "Exploring available landslide inventories for susceptibility analysis in Gipuzkoa province (Spain)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 2513-2542, September.
    2. Qiang Liu & Aiping Tang & Ziyuan Huang & Lixin Sun & Xiaosheng Han, 2022. "Discussion on the tree-based machine learning model in the study of landslide susceptibility," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 887-911, September.
    3. Cuiying Zhou & Jinwu Ouyang & Zhen Liu & Lihai Zhang, 2022. "Early Risk Warning of Highway Soft Rock Slope Group Using Fuzzy-Based Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Chao Chen & Jian Zhou & Tao Zhou & Weixun Yong, 2021. "Evaluation of vertical shaft stability in underground mines: comparison of three weight methods with uncertainty theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1457-1479, November.
    5. Xianmin Wang & Xinlong Zhang & Jia Bi & Xudong Zhang & Shiqiang Deng & Zhiwei Liu & Lizhe Wang & Haixiang Guo, 2022. "Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Based on Potential Disaster Identification and Ensemble Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Jae-Hyeon Park & Seong-Gyun Park & Hyun Kim, 2022. "Applicability Evaluation of Landslide Vulnerability Criteria for Decision on Landcreep-Vulnerable Areas in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Ayse Yavuz Ozalp & Halil Akinci, 2023. "Evaluation of Land Suitability for Olive ( Olea europaea L.) Cultivation Using the Random Forest Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Esteban Bravo-López & Tomás Fernández Del Castillo & Chester Sellers & Jorge Delgado-García, 2023. "Analysis of Conditioning Factors in Cuenca, Ecuador, for Landslide Susceptibility Maps Generation Employing Machine Learning Methods," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Lingfan Ju & Huan Yu & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Xiaoyu Xu, 2023. "Spatial Coupling Pattern and Driving Forces of Rural Settlements and Arable Land in Alpine Canyon Region of the Maoxian County, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Han Zhang & Chao Yin & Shaoping Wang & Bing Guo, 2023. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide classification and improved convolutional neural networks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1931-1971, March.
    11. Hubert Szczepaniuk & Edyta Karolina Szczepaniuk, 2022. "Applications of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Mohammad Amin Khalili & Luigi Guerriero & Mostafa Pouralizadeh & Domenico Calcaterra & Diego Martire, 2023. "Monitoring and prediction of landslide-related deformation based on the GCN-LSTM algorithm and SAR imagery," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 39-68, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6330-:d:821644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.