IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i4p744-d1107528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiscenario Simulation of Land-Use Change in Hubei Province, China Based on the Markov-FLUS Model

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Zhu

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Yufeng Cheng

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Weiye Zang

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Quan Zhou

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Youssef El Archi

    (National School of Business and Management of Tangier, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier 90000, Morocco)

  • Hossein Mousazadeh

    (Department of Regional Science, Faculty of Science, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Moaaz Kabil

    (Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Godollo, Hungary
    Faculty of Urban and Regional Planning, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

  • Katalin Csobán

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4031 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Lóránt Dénes Dávid

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, 6000 Kecskemet, Hungary
    Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Godollo, Hungary)

Abstract

A goal of land change modelers should be to communicate scenarios of future change that show the variety of possible future landscapes based on the consequences of management decisions. This study employs the Markov-FLUS model to simulate land-use changes in Hubei Province in multiple scenarios that consider social, economic, and ecological policies using 18 driving factors, including point-of-interest data. First, the Markov-FLUS model was developed and validated with historical data from 2000 to 2020. The model was then used to simulate land-use changes from 2020 to 2035 in four scenarios: natural development, economic priority, ecological protection, and cultivated land protection. The results show that the Markov-FLUS model effectively simulates the land-use change pattern in Hubei Province, with an overall accuracy of 0.93 for land use simulation in 2020. The Kappa coefficient and FOM index also achieved 0.86 and 0.139, respectively. In all four scenarios, cultivated land remained the primary land use type in Hubei Province from 2020 to 2035, while construction land showed an increasing trend. However, there were large differences in the simulated land use patterns in different scenarios. Construction land expanded most rapidly in the economic priority scenario, while it expanded more slowly in the cultivated land protection scenario. We designed the protection scenario to restrict the rapid expansion of construction land. In the natural development and economic priority scenarios, construction land expanded and encroached on cultivated land and forests. In contrast, in the ecological protection scenario, forests and water areas were well-preserved, and the decrease in cultivated land and the increase in construction land were effectively suppressed, resulting in a large improvement in land use sustainability. Finally, in the cultivated land protection scenario, the cultivated land showed an increasing trend. The spread and expansion of construction land were effectively curbed. In conclusion, the Markov-FLUS model applied in this study to simulate land use in multiple scenarios has substantial implications for the effective utilization of land resources and the protection of the ecological environment in Hubei Province.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Zhu & Yufeng Cheng & Weiye Zang & Quan Zhou & Youssef El Archi & Hossein Mousazadeh & Moaaz Kabil & Katalin Csobán & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Multiscenario Simulation of Land-Use Change in Hubei Province, China Based on the Markov-FLUS Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:744-:d:1107528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/4/744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srishti Gaur & Rajendra Singh, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) Change Modeling for Urban Development: Current Status and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Yang, Tao & Liu, Jingling & Chen, Qiuying, 2013. "Assessment of plain river ecosystem function based on improved gray system model and analytic hierarchy process for the Fuyang River, Haihe River Basin, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 37-47.
    3. Zhao, Liyuan & Peng, Zhong-Ren, 2012. "LandSys: an agent-based Cellular Automata model of land use change developed for transportation analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 35-49.
    4. Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Constantina Alina Hossu & Simona Raluca Grădinaru & Andreea Nita & Mihai-Sorin Stupariu & Alina Huzui-Stoiculescu & Athanasios-Alexandru Gavrilidis, 2020. "A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Quan Zhou & Kai Zhu & Ling Kang & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Tea Culture Tourism Perception: A Study on the Harmony of Importance and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Changchang Liu & Chuxiong Deng & Zhongwu Li & Yaojun Liu & Shuyuan Wang, 2022. "Optimization of Spatial Pattern of Land Use: Progress, Frontiers, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning He & Wenxian Guo & Hongxiang Wang & Long Yu & Siyuan Cheng & Lintong Huang & Xuyang Jiao & Wenxiong Chen & Haotong Zhou, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Variations in Landscape Habitat Quality under Multiple Land-Use/Land-Cover Scenarios Based on the PLUS-InVEST Model in the Yangtze River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Amir Ghorbani & Ali Zangiabadi & Hossein Mousazadeh & Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Travel to Mars-like Places on Earth: A New Branch of Sustainable Ecotourism in Lut Desert World Heritage Site, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Zhanfu Luo & Wei Zheng & Juanqin Liu & Jin Wang & Xue Bai, 2024. "A Multi-Objective Scenario Study of County Land Use in Loess Hilly Areas: Taking Lintao County as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Hossein Mousazadeh & Amir Ghorbani & Hossein Azadi & Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani & Hasan Mosazadeh & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Sense of Place Attitudes on Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Iranian Residents in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingbo Fu & Chengyu Xiong & Min Xu, 2023. "Influential Factors Affecting Tea Tourists’ Behavior Intention in Cultural Ecosystem Services: An Affordance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Andreea Ionescu & Radu Tudor & Alin-Ionuț Pleșoianu & Mioara Clius, 2022. "Online Environment as a Tool to Push Forward the Research: An Example for Landscape Disservices," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Yuekui Ding & Baoqing Shan & Yu Zhao, 2015. "Assessment of River Habitat Quality in the Hai River Basin, Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. You, Xiaoguang & Liu, Jingling & Zhang, Lulu, 2015. "Ecological modeling of riparian vegetation under disturbances: A review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 293-300.
    5. D'Agata, Alessia & Alaimo, Leonardo Salvatore & Cudlín, Pavel & Salvati, Luca, 2023. "Easy come, easy go: Short-term land-use dynamics vis à vis regional economic downturns," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Lucília Cardoso & Eunice Lopes & Giovana Goretti Feijó de Almeida & Luís Lima Santos & Bruno Sousa & Jorge Simões & Fernando Perna, 2023. "Features of Nautical Tourism in Portugal—Projected Destination Image with a Sustainability Marketing Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
    8. Furui Xi & Gang Lin & Yanan Zhao & Xiang Li & Zhiyu Chen & Chenglong Cao, 2023. "Land Use Optimization and Carbon Storage Estimation in the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Yu Wu & Yonghui Wang, 2024. "An Empirical Study on the Tourist Cognitive Evaluations of Tourism Public Services in Xinjiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Amir Ghorbani & Hossein Mousazadeh & Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani & Masoud Lajevardi & Mohammad Reza Hamidizadeh & Mehrdad Orouei & Kai Zhu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Reconceptualizing Customer Perceived Value in Hotel Management in Turbulent Times: A Case Study of Isfahan Metropolis Five-Star Hotels during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Chenglong Cao & Dongwei Zhang, 2020. "Spatial Conflict of Production–Living–Ecological Space and Sustainable-Development Scenario Simulation in Yangtze River Delta Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, March.
    12. You, L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Zhang, J.L., 2014. "Modeling regional ecosystem development under uncertainty – A case study for New Binhai District of Tianjin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 127-142.
    13. Wang, Ling & Wang, Ke & Zhang, Jianjun & Zhang, Di & Wu, Xia & Zhang, Lijun, 2020. "Multiple objective-oriented land supply for sustainable transportation: A perspective from industrial dependence, dominance and restrictions of 127 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Chunsheng Wu & Gaohuan Liu & Chong Huang & Qingsheng Liu & Xudong Guan, 2018. "Ecological Vulnerability Assessment Based on Fuzzy Analytical Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process in Yellow River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Xiangyu Zhao & Wenzhi Yan & Kaige Wang & Yan Xu & Huihui Zheng & Zhiting Sang, 2023. "Study of the Morphological Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Semiarid Sandy Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Agung Budi Supangat & Tyas Mutiara Basuki & Yonky Indrajaya & Ogi Setiawan & Nining Wahyuningrum & Purwanto & Pamungkas Buana Putra & Endang Savitri & Dewi Retna Indrawati & Diah Auliyani & Ryke Nandi, 2023. "Sustainable Management for Healthy and Productive Watersheds in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-34, October.
    18. Dawid Kudas & Agnieszka Wnęk & Lucia Tátošová, 2022. "Land Use Mix in Functional Urban Areas of Selected Central European Countries from 2006 to 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Majid FathiZahraei & Govindan Marthandan & Murali Raman & Azita Asadi, 2015. "Reducing risks in crisis management by GIS adoption," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 83-98, March.
    20. Shufei Wang & Yining Zhuang & Yingui Cao & Kai Yang, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis of a Typical Mine–Agriculture–Urban Compound Area in North Shanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:744-:d:1107528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.