IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p365-d1050122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Active and Passive Carbon Fractions in Contrasting Cropping Systems, Tillage Practices, and Soil Types

Author

Listed:
  • S. Rakesh

    (Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Coochbehar 736165, India)

  • Abhas Kumar Sinha

    (Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Coochbehar 736165, India)

  • Deepranjan Sarkar

    (Integral Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Integral University, Lucknow 226026, India)

  • Dewali Roy

    (Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Divya Bodiga

    (Department of Silviculture & Agroforestry, Sam Higginbottom University of Agricultural, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj 211007, India)

  • Samaresh Sahoo

    (Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Coochbehar 736165, India)

  • Prakash Kumar Jha

    (Feed the Future Sustainable Intensification Innovation Lab, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • Pradeep Kumar Dubey

    (Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India)

  • Amitava Rakshit

    (Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India)

Abstract

The rate of change in the relative amount of active and passive carbon (AC and PC) due to the land management practices (cropping systems combined with tillage) may vary with soil types depending on their level of chemical and/or physical protection from the decomposition but has rarely been directly measured. We have quantified the C storage potentiality of different soil types, namely old alluvial Inceptisol of Malda and recent alluvial Entisol of Coochbehar in West Bengal (subtropical eastern India) under the influence of different cropping systems (rice-maize: RM and rice-wheat: RW) and tillage practices (zero-tillage: ZT and conventional tillage: CT). The key objective was to demonstrate the short-term impact of conservation agriculture (CA) on soil C dynamics over the conventional practice. Research revealed that after short-term CA, total organic carbon (TOC), AC, PC, and total nitrogen (TN) showed significant ( p < 0.05) improvement under the RM cropping system over the RW. The highest TOC content under the RM cropping system was recorded in the sites of Malda over the Coochbehar sites. The ZT significantly ( p < 0.05) enhanced the TOC in the upper layers (0–5 and 5–10 cm) and the CT showed improvements in the lower depths (10–20 cm). We observed some irregular variations in the interactions of the cropping system and tillage with respect to different sites. However, the ZT performed better in improving C fractions under RM and RW as compared to CT. The TOC and TN stocks were maximum in the lower depth which was evident in both soil types. The TOC linearly regressed on TN accounted for 94.2% variability (R 2 = 0.942) of the C accumulation in soil and vice-versa. The PC was in a significant relationship with TN (R 2 = 0.943), but AC was moderately regressed (R 2 = 0.851). Lower stratification ratio values in Coochbehar soils (sandy loam in texture) indicated higher profile distribution of AC and PC in the soil profile; while in the Inceptisol, accumulation of the C fractions on the soil surface due to heavy texture resulted in the higher stratification values. The novelty of this study is that old alluvial Inceptisol showed a comparatively greater amount of AC and PC storage capability in comparison with the new alluvial Entisol. Conclusively, our study demonstrated that the adoption of conservation agriculture (CA practice/ZT) in cropping systems with higher C biomass input would significantly enhance the AC and PC fractions; however, the amount of storage is highly governed by the soil type and climatic factors.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Rakesh & Abhas Kumar Sinha & Deepranjan Sarkar & Dewali Roy & Divya Bodiga & Samaresh Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Jha & Pradeep Kumar Dubey & Amitava Rakshit, 2023. "Active and Passive Carbon Fractions in Contrasting Cropping Systems, Tillage Practices, and Soil Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:365-:d:1050122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/365/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/365/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mi, Wenhai & Sun, Yan & Zhao, Cai & Wu, Lianghuan, 2019. "Soil organic carbon and its labile fractions in paddy soil as influenced by water regimes and straw management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Rakesh S & Deepranjan Sarkar & Abhas Kumar Sinha & Shikha & Prabir Mukhopadhyay & Subhan Danish & Shah Fahad & Rahul Datta, 2021. "Carbon Mineralization Rates and Kinetics of Surface-Applied and Incorporated Rice and Maize Residues in Entisol and Inceptisol Soil Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kulasinghe, Tharindu Nuwan & Dharmakeerthi, Randombage Saman, 2022. "Effects of land use type and tank components on soil properties and sustainability of tank cascade system in the Dry Zone of north central Sri Lanka," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:365-:d:1050122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.