IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i12p2164-d1299743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating System Spatial Archetypes and Archetypical Evolutionary Patterns of Human Settlements: Towards Place-Based Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Wenlin Gao

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Wanyue Lyu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Binyi Liu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China
    Professor Liu has retired from Tongji University and is currently affiliated with Macau University of Science and Technology.)

Abstract

Effectively managing the diversity and complexity of human settlements is pivotal in tackling the sustainability challenges we face in the Anthropocene. Conceptualizing a city’s human settlement as a unified social–ecological system and investigating its system archetype and evolutionary pattern offer a promising approach to understanding sustainability challenges within specific spatio-temporal contexts. This study introduced a novel approach to assessing and characterizing human settlements using a spatio-temporal two-tier structure archetype analysis for human settlement systems. Applying inductive clustering to an integrated dataset, we identified five typical human settlement systems for 2019 and eight change patterns (2001–2019) in the Yangtze River Delta region. By linking inductively recognized human settlement systems into deductive categories of human-nature connectedness and associating inductive change patterns with deduced phases within the adaptive cycle, we defined five system spatial archetypes and three archetypical evolutionary patterns, revealing the typical interaction between them. This enabled us to understand sustainability challenges for each interaction, formulating seven tailored solutions to promote place-based development in human settlements. Generally, our approach showcases considerable potential in uncovering human settlement challenges, ultimately contributing to addressing these challenges at the local level within the broader context of global sustainability issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenlin Gao & Wanyue Lyu & Binyi Liu, 2023. "Integrating System Spatial Archetypes and Archetypical Evolutionary Patterns of Human Settlements: Towards Place-Based Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2164-:d:1299743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuhmonen, Irene & Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2023. "Transitions through the dynamics of adaptive cycles: Evolution of the Finnish agrifood system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Thomas J. Wilbanks, 2003. "Integrating climate change and sustainable development in a place-based context," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(sup1), pages 147-154, November.
    3. Wenxi Zhu & Jing Zhang & Jinfei Dai & Da Wang & Chongsen Ma & Yufang Xu & Yun Chen, 2023. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors on Green Building Development of City Clusters in the Yangtze River Delta Region in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Graeme S. Cumming & Andreas Buerkert & Ellen M. Hoffmann & Eva Schlecht & Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel & Teja Tscharntke, 2014. "Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7525), pages 50-57, November.
    5. Tan, Shukui & Hu, Bixia & Kuang, Bing & Zhou, Min, 2021. "Regional differences and dynamic evolution of urban land green use efficiency within the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. R. Cremades & S. Surminski & M. Máñez Costa & P. Hudson & P. Shrivastava & J. Gascoigne, 2018. "Using the adaptive cycle in climate-risk insurance to design resilient futures," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 4-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen Wang & Xupeng Zhang & Chaozheng Zhang & Qing Yang, 2022. "How Regional Integration Affects Urban Green Development Efficiency: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Duy X. Tran & Diane Pearson & Alan Palmer & David Gray, 2020. "Developing a Landscape Design Approach for the Sustainable Land Management of Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-29, June.
    3. Dai, Xuhuan & Li, Bo & Zheng, Hua & Yang, Yanzheng & Yang, Zihan & Peng, Chenchen, 2023. "Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Verena Preusse & Nils Nölke & Meike Wollni, 2024. "Urbanization and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in the rural‐urban interface of Bangalore, India," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(2), pages 167-198, June.
    5. Hiranya Sritart & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Sakiko Kanbara & Takashi Hara, 2020. "Methodology and Application of Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for Evacuation Shelters in Disaster Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Xiaomeng Guo & Li Wang & Qiang Fu & Fang Ma, 2024. "Ecological Function Zoning Framework for Small Watershed Ecosystem Services Based on Multivariate Analysis from a Scale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Liping Zhang & Xiaoliang Zhou, 2024. "Exploring the spatiotemporal structure and driving mechanism of digital village construction in China based on social network analysis and Geodetector," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Yaofeng Yang & Yajuan Chen & Zhenrong Yu & Pengyao Li & Xuedong Li, 2020. "How Does Improve Farmers’ Attitudes toward Ecosystem Services to Support Sustainable Development of Agriculture? Based on Environmental Kuznets Curve Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Xing Liu & Zhaoyang Cai & Yan Xu & Huihui Zheng & Kaige Wang & Fengrong Zhang, 2022. "Suitability Evaluation of Cultivated Land Reserved Resources in Arid Areas Based on Regional Water Balance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(4), pages 1463-1479, March.
    10. Qindong Fan & Xiaoyu Yang & Chenming Zhang, 2022. "A Review of Ecosystem Services Research Focusing on China against the Background of Urbanization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Ellen M Hoffmann & Verena Konerding & Sunil Nautiyal & Andreas Buerkert, 2019. "Is the push-pull paradigm useful to explain rural-urban migration? A case study in Uttarakhand, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Targetti, Stefano & Schaller, Lena L. & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2021. "A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach for the assessment of public-goods governance in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Wu, Tong & Rocha, Juan C. & Berry, Kevin & Chaigneau, Tomas & Hamann, Maike & Lindkvist, Emilie & Qiu, Jiangxiao & Schill, Caroline & Shepon, Alon & Crépin, Anne-Sophie & Folke, Carl, 2024. "Triple Bottom Line or Trilemma? Global Tradeoffs Between Prosperity, Inequality, and the Environment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Guangya Zhou & Helian Xu & Chuanzeng Jiang & Shiqi Deng & Liming Chen & Zhi Zhang, 2024. "Has the Digital Economy Improved the Urban Land Green Use Efficiency? Evidence from the National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, June.
    16. Giedrius Dabašinskas & Gintarė Sujetovienė, 2024. "Spatial and Temporal Changes in Supply and Demand for Ecosystem Services in Response to Urbanization: A Case Study in Vilnius, Lithuania," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Giovanni Pilato & Susannah M. Sallu & Marta Gaworek-Michalczenia, 2018. "Assessing the Integration of Climate Change and Development Strategies at Local Levels: Insights from Muheza District, Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Kun Ge & Shan Zou & Danling Chen & Xinhai Lu & Shangan Ke, 2021. "Research on the Spatial Differences and Convergence Mechanism of Urban Land Use Efficiency under the Background of Regional Integration: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Zone, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Song, Xiaoqing & Wang, Xiong & Hu, Shougeng & Xiao, Renbin & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Functional transition of cultivated ecosystems: Underlying mechanisms and policy implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2164-:d:1299743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.