IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i12p2092-d1284666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Mosaic Natural Conditions on the Tourism Management of a Lowland Water Reservoir, Lake Tisza, Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Borbála Benkhard

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Péter Csorba

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Tamás Mester

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Dániel Balla

    (Department of Data Science and Visualization, Faculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, 4023 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Emőke Kiss

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • György Szabó

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • István Fazekas

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Róbert Vass

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Azin Rooien

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Mária Vasvári

    (Department of Landscape Protection and Environmental Geography, Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

The increasing number of visitors and conflicts resulting from shared use in valorising sensitive wetlands make effective visitor and site management measures essential. In the course of this research, the landscape pattern, the current spatial distribution of tourist activities and the possible arrangement of expedient further development were examined. The study area, Lake Tisza, is an artificial lowland reservoir established in the 1970s with an area of 127 km 2 in Hungary. Among its original functions, in addition to flood control, nature conservation and recreation have become the main profiles. The diverse hydro-ecological features and mosaic landscape structure allow for nature conservation and utilisation in tourism. This differentiated use is in line with the worldwide trend of favouring locations with multiple leisure activities in close proximity to each other. Based on the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) 2018 database, 12 different land use categories were identified in the study area. The largest proportion is represented by water bodies (53.29%), while inland marshes and broad-leaved forests cover 22.25% and 16.64%, respectively. The heterogeneity of the area is considerably enhanced by the high patch sizes of the categories pastures, broad-leaved forests and inland marshes. According to the Shannon diversity index, the most complex landscape diversity can be found in the Tiszavalk (1.5) and Poroszló (1.4) basins, considered to be the most suitable for ecotourism, while the lower values of the Sarud (1.1) and Abadszalók (1.1) basins provide suitable conditions for water sport activities and recreational tourism. Continuous adaptation to social needs and the joint protection of natural values is crucial for the sustainable development of Lake Tisza.

Suggested Citation

  • Borbála Benkhard & Péter Csorba & Tamás Mester & Dániel Balla & Emőke Kiss & György Szabó & István Fazekas & Róbert Vass & Azin Rooien & Mária Vasvári, 2023. "Effects of Mosaic Natural Conditions on the Tourism Management of a Lowland Water Reservoir, Lake Tisza, Hungary," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2092-:d:1284666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2092/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2092/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M Hedblom & H Hedenås & M Blicharska & S Adler & I Knez & G Mikusiński & J Svensson & S Sandström & P Sandström & D. A. Wardle, 2020. "Landscape perception: linking physical monitoring data to perceived landscape properties," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 179-192, February.
    2. Thomas Hahn & Malena Heinrup & Regina Lindborg, 2018. "Landscape heterogeneity correlates with recreational values: a case study from Swedish agricultural landscapes and implications for policy," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 696-707, July.
    3. Andreas Skriver Hansen, 2021. "Understanding recreational landscapes – a review and discussion," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 128-141, January.
    4. Kati Häfner & Ingo Zasada & Boris T. van Zanten & Fabrizio Ungaro & Mark Koetse & Annette Piorr, 2018. "Assessing landscape preferences: a visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Märkische Schweiz, Germany," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 846-861, August.
    5. David H. Llewellyn & Melanie Rohse & Jemma Bere & Karen Lewis & Hamish Fyfe, 2019. "Transforming landscapes and identities in the south Wales valleys," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 804-821, October.
    6. Hjortsø, Carsten Nico & Stræde, Steffen & Helles, Finn, 2006. "Applying multi-criteria decision-making to protected areas and buffer zone management: A case study in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 91-108, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasija Novikova & Lucia Rocchi & Bernardas Vaznonis, 2019. "Valuing Agricultural Landscape: Lithuanian Case Study Using a Contingent Valuation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Nicholas Tyack & Milan Ščasný, 2018. "Social Valuation of Genebank Activities: Assessing Public Demand for Genetic Resource Conservation in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Schaak, Henning & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2019. "Public preferences for livestock presence in pasture landscape: A latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment in Germany," DARE Discussion Papers 1901, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    4. Brill, Gregg & Anderson, Pippin & O'Farrell, Patrick, 2017. "Urban national parks in the global South: Linking management perceptions, policies and practices to water-related ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 185-195.
    5. Kristine Lien Skog, 2018. "How Do Policies and Actors’ Attitudes, Interests and Interactions Influence Farmland Conversion Outcomes in Land-Use Planning?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Rong Fan & Junxi Fan & Jiayu Song & Kaiyuan Li & Wenli Ji, 2021. "Naturalness in the City: Demographic Groups’ Differences in Preference for Deciduous Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Jingxiong Huang & Jiaqi Liang & Mengsheng Yang & Yuan Li, 2022. "Visual Preference Analysis and Planning Responses Based on Street View Images: A Case Study of Gulangyu Island, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Castillo-Eguskitza, Nekane & Hoyos, David & Onaindia, Miren & Czajkowski, Mikolaj, 2019. "Unraveling local preferences and willingness to pay for different management scenarios: A choice experiment to biosphere reserve management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Zasada, I. & Weltin, M. & Reutter, M. & Verburg, P.H. & Piorr, A., 2018. "EU’s rural development policy at the regional level—Are expenditures for natural capital linked with territorial needs?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 344-353.
    10. O'Donoghue, Cathal & Hynes, Stephen & Kilgarriff, Paul & Ryan, Mary & Tsakiridis, Andreas, 2020. "Assessing preferences for rural landscapes: An attribute based choice modelling approach," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(2), August.
    11. Bingjie Song & Guy M. Robinson & Douglas K. Bardsley, 2020. "Measuring Multifunctional Agricultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Sunil Nautiyal & Harald Kaechele & M. S. Umesh Babu & Y. D. Imran Khan & Himangshu Dutta, 2020. "Avian conservation under two management regimes: a case study from the viewpoint of governance and social dimension," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 148-169, March.
    13. Lin, Yi-Hsing & Hong, Chun-Fu & Lee, Chun-Hung & Chen, Chih-Cheng, 2020. "Integrating Aspects of Ecosystem Dimensions into Sorghum and Wheat Production Areas in Kinmen, Taiwan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Raviv, Orna & Tchetchik, Anat & Lotan, Alon & Izhaki, Ido & Zemah Shamir, Shiri, 2021. "Direct and indirect valuation of air-quality regulation service as reflected in the preferences towards distinct types of landscape in a biosphere reserve," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Grimsrud, Kristine & Hagem, Cathrine & Lind, Arne & Lindhjem, Henrik, 2021. "Efficient spatial distribution of wind power plants given environmental externalities due to turbines and grids," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Esperanza Ayuga-Téllez & Juan José Ramírez-Montoro & Maria Ángeles Grande-Ortiz & Diego Muñoz-Violero, 2021. "Differences in Visual Preference in Rural Landscapes on the Plain of La Mancha in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Waleed Alzamil & Sarah Abdulkareem Salih & Sumarni Ismail & Ali Ajlan & Athira Azmi, 2023. "Factors Affecting Social Learning in Nearby Pockets on Tropical Campus Grounds: Towards a Sustainable Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Katharina Conradin & Thomas Hammer, 2016. "Making the Most of World Natural Heritage—Linking Conservation and Sustainable Regional Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, March.
    19. Schaak, Henning & Musshoff, Oliver, 2020. "Public preferences for pasture landscapes in Germany—A latent class analysis of a nationwide discrete choice experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Robert Huber & Robert Finger, 2020. "A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 357-383, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2092-:d:1284666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.