IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i10p1836-d1247918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest Inventory Data Provide Useful Information for Mapping Ecosystem Services Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Edgars Jūrmalis

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
    Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia)

  • Arta Bārdule

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Jānis Donis

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Linda Gerra-Inohosa

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

  • Zane Lībiete

    (Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia)

Abstract

The ecosystem services framework is a convenient approach for identifying and mapping nature’s contributions to people, and an accurate assessment of ecosystem services potential is the first step in the decision support process of well-informed land management planning. The approach we use for forest ecosystem services potential assessment in Latvia is based on the principles of the matrix model and biophysical data of the forest inventory database, and it is comparable to other assessments previously carried out in the Baltic Sea Region. The proposed approach supports spatial planning and may be integrated with assessments of other ecosystems based on the same methodological principles. The evaluation results reflect the high spatial heterogeneity of forest types in Latvia. Future work should include integrating ecosystem services flows and demand into the assessment, developing additional indicators for culturally important ecosystem services, and introducing socio-cultural valuation to account for a broader set of stakeholders and values.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgars Jūrmalis & Arta Bārdule & Jānis Donis & Linda Gerra-Inohosa & Zane Lībiete, 2023. "Forest Inventory Data Provide Useful Information for Mapping Ecosystem Services Potential," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1836-:d:1247918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oleksandr Karasov & Stien Heremans & Mart Külvik & Artem Domnich & Igor Chervanyov, 2020. "On How Crowdsourced Data and Landscape Organisation Metrics Can Facilitate the Mapping of Cultural Ecosystem Services: An Estonian Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Dunford, Rob & Harrison, Paula & Smith, Alison & Dick, Jan & Barton, David N. & Martin-Lopez, Berta & Kelemen, Ezsther & Jacobs, Sander & Saarikoski, Heli & Turkelboom, Francis & Verheyden, Wim & Hauc, 2018. "Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 499-514.
    3. Bagdon, Benjamin A. & Huang, Ching-Hsun & Dewhurst, Stephen, 2016. "Managing for ecosystem services in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests using a novel simulation-to-optimization methodology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 324(C), pages 11-27.
    4. Jacobs, Sander & Burkhard, Benjamin & Van Daele, Toon & Staes, Jan & Schneiders, Anik, 2015. "‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 21-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarmila Makovníková & Stanislav Kološta & Filip Flaška & Boris Pálka, 2023. "Potential of Regulating Ecosystem Services in Relation to Natural Capital in Model Regions of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Depietri, Yaella & Ghermandi, Andrea & Campisi-Pinto, Salvatore & Orenstein, Daniel E., 2021. "Public participation GIS versus geolocated social media data to assess urban cultural ecosystem services: Instances of complementarity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    5. Purnamita Dasgupta & Kavitha Srikanth, 2021. "Achieving the climate goal with intergovernmental transfers to the forestry sector: insights from the Indian experience," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Dawei Wen & Song Ma & Anlu Zhang & Xinli Ke, 2021. "Spatial Pattern Analysis of the Ecosystem Services in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery Based on Deep Learning Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Agudelo, César Augusto Ruiz & Bustos, Sandra Liliana Hurtado & Moreno, Carmen Alicia Parrado, 2020. "Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. A critical review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    8. Davide Marino & Antonio Barone & Angelo Marucci & Silvia Pili & Margherita Palmieri, 2024. "The Integrated Analysis of Territorial Transformations in Inland Areas of Italy: The Link between Natural, Social, and Economic Capitals Using the Ecosystem Service Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Luo, Xiangyu & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Jingyi & Jin, Jing & Yang, Jun, 2021. "Simulating PM2.5 removal in an urban ecosystem based on the social-ecological model framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Ágnes Vári & Eszter Tanács & Eszter Tormáné Kovács & Ágnes Kalóczkai & Ildikó Arany & Bálint Czúcz & Krisztina Bereczki & Márta Belényesi & Edina Csákvári & Márton Kiss & Veronika Fabók & Lívia Kisné , 2022. "National Ecosystem Services Assessment in Hungary: Framework, Process and Conceptual Questions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Zimmerer, Karl S. & Olivencia, Yolanda Jiménez & Rodríguez, Laura Porcel & López-Estébanez, Nieves & Álvarez, Fernando Allende & Olmo, Rafael Mata & Ochoa, Carolina Yacamán & Pulpón, Ángel Raúl Ruiz &, 2022. "Assessing social-ecological connectivity of agricultural landscapes in Spain: Resilience implications amid agricultural intensification trends and urbanization," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Gudrun Schwilch & Tatenda Lemann & Örjan Berglund & Carlo Camarotto & Artemi Cerdà & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Silvia Kohnová & Dominika Krzeminska & Teodoro Marañón & René Rietra & Grzegorz Siebiele, 2018. "Assessing Impacts of Soil Management Measures on Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Scemama, Pierre & Mongruel, Rémi & Kermagoret, Charlène & Bailly, Denis & Carlier, Antoine & Mao, Patrick Le & Vaschalde, et Diane, 2022. "Guidance for stakeholder consultation to support national ecosystem services assessment: A case study from French marine assessment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Chen, Wanxu & Chi, Guangqing & Li, Jiangfeng, 2020. "The spatial aspect of ecosystem services balance and its determinants," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Weixuan Wei & Yiqi Wang & Qi Yan & Guanpeng Liu & Nannan Dong, 2024. "Assessing Buffer Gradient Synergies: Comparing Objective and Subjective Evaluations of Urban Park Ecosystem Services in Century Park, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-33, November.
    16. Eszter Tormáné Kovács & Csaba Centeri, 2023. "Assessment of Ecosystem Services at Different Scales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-5, December.
    17. Zapata-Caldas, Emmanuel & Calcagni, Fulvia & Baró, Francesc & Langemeyer, Johannes, 2022. "Using crowdsourced imagery to assess cultural ecosystem services in data-scarce urban contexts: The case of the metropolitan area of Cali, Colombia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    18. Lia Laporta & Tiago Domingos & Cristina Marta-Pedroso, 2021. "Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems Services under the Proposed MAES European Common Framework: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-28, October.
    19. Diana Mancilla-Ruiz & Francisco de la Barrera & Sergio González & Ana Huaico, 2021. "The Effects of a Megafire on Ecosystem Services and the Pace of Landscape Recovery," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Ingrid Nesheim & Line Barkved, 2019. "The Suitability of the Ecosystem Services Framework for Guiding Benefit Assessments in Human-Modified Landscapes Exemplified by Regulated Watersheds—Implications for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1836-:d:1247918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.