IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p14-d1009740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation, Recognition and Implications of Urban–Rural Integration Development: A Township-Level Analysis of Hanchuan City in Wuhan Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Shiwei Lu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China
    The Key Laboratory of Urban Simulation for Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yaping Huang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China
    The Key Laboratory of Urban Simulation for Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xiaoqing Wu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Real Estate Management Bureau, Dayabay Economic and Technological Development Zone, Huizhou 516000, China)

  • Yichen Ding

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Hubei Engineering and Technology Research Center of Urbanization, Wuhan 430074, China
    The Key Laboratory of Urban Simulation for Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

China has achieved success in implementing the rural revitalization strategy and promoting the development of new urbanization. However, there are still many problems in the research and implementation on urban–rural integration development, such as insufficient research at the township level, unclear recognition of development patterns, and disconnection from land-use planning. Therefore, taking Hanchuan city in the Wuhan metropolitan area as a case study, this research constructs a comprehensive evaluation system of urban–rural integration development based on both on the current and potential level of development, and identifies the spatial characteristics and patterns in the study area. This study found that: (1) The comprehensive evaluation result of urban–rural integration development in Hanchuan City shows that a high level of development units are mainly distributed in the northeast and southwest, and gradually decreases from the northeast and southwest, indicating that towns in the central area are relatively weakly driven by the radiation of the surrounding growth poles. (2) Xiannvshan Street, Makou Town, Chenhu Town, and Xinyan Town with the highest comprehensive evaluation values were selected as the centers of urban–rural integration development in four directions. (3) Four typical patterns of urban–rural integration development, which are town gathering, agro-tourism interaction, industry-trade driven, and agricultural service, are derived by the gravity model and classification assignment method according to their respective centers. (4) According to the urban–rural integration development patterns, land-use strategies such as centralization for promoting linkage level of towns, differentiation for arranging various resources and infrastructures, and demonstration for optimization of experience to the whole area are proposed in a targeted manner. This study has important implications for the preparation and implementation of urban–rural integration development and provides effective planning guidance for promoting social equity and accessibility of facilities in the metropolitan area.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiwei Lu & Yaping Huang & Xiaoqing Wu & Yichen Ding, 2022. "Evaluation, Recognition and Implications of Urban–Rural Integration Development: A Township-Level Analysis of Hanchuan City in Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:14-:d:1009740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Zhao & Changjun Jiang, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Dynamic Effects of Urban-Rural Integration Development in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Liu, Sheng & Ge, Jian & Bai, Ming & Yao, Min & He, Linying & Chen, Ming, 2022. "Toward classification-based sustainable revitalization: Assessing the vitality of traditional villages," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Congjun Rao & Yue Gao, 2022. "Evaluation Mechanism Design for the Development Level of Urban-Rural Integration Based on an Improved TOPSIS Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Jiansheng Wu & Tengyun Yi & Han Wang & Hongliang Wang & Jiayi Fu & Yuhao Zhao, 2022. "Evaluation of Medical Carrying Capacity for Megacities from a Traffic Analysis Zone View: A Case Study in Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Bill Reimer, 2002. "A Sample Frame for Rural Canada: Design and Evaluation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 845-859.
    6. Yumin Ye & Richard LeGates & Bo Qin, 2013. "Coordinated Urban-Rural Development Planning in China," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(2), pages 125-137, April.
    7. Yongzhen Wang & Xianzhong Cao, 2022. "Village Evaluation and Classification Guidance of a County in Southeast Gansu Based on the Rural Revitalization Strategy," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Xinguo Bu & Lijie Pu & Chunzhu Shen & Xuefeng Xie & Caiyao Xu, 2020. "Study on the Spatial Restructuring of the Village System at the County Level Oriented toward the Rural Revitalization Strategy: A Case of Jintan District, Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Tian, Yasi & Qian, Jing & Wang, Lei, 2021. "Village classification in metropolitan suburbs from the perspective of urban-rural integration and improvement strategies: A case study of Wuhan, central China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    10. Felix Requena, 2016. "Rural–Urban Living and Level of Economic Development as Factors in Subjective Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 693-708, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiji Jiang & Jiaxin Sun & Tianzi Zhang & Qian Li & Yan Ma & Wen Qu & Dan Ye & Zhendong Lei, 2025. "Defining Rural Types Nearby Large Cities from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Integration: A Case Study of Xi’an Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Lingling Dai & Weifeng Qiao & Ting Feng & Yuanfang Li, 2022. "Research on Village Type Identification and Development Strategy under the Background of Rural Revitalization: A Case of Gaochun District in Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Leiru Wei & Xiaojie Zhao & Jianxin Lu, 2022. "Measuring the Level of Urban–Rural Integration Development and Analyzing the Spatial Pattern Based on the New Development Concept: Evidence from Cities in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-26, December.
    4. František Petrovič & Patrik Maturkanič, 2022. "Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Fredrik Carlsen & Stefan Leknes, 2022. "For whom are cities good places to live?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2177-2190, December.
    6. Xiaoli Shi & Ying Chen & Menghan Xia & Yongli Zhang, 2022. "Effects of the Talent War on Urban Innovation in China: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Tian Tian & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Pursuing Development behind Heterogeneous Ideologies: Review of Six Evolving Themes and Narratives of Rural Planning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Jun Zhang & Runni Zhang & Qilun Li & Xue Zhang & Xiong He, 2023. "Spatial Sifferentiation and Differentiated Development Paths of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2023. "Land Development Rights, Spatial Injustice, and the Economic Development in Net-Incremental Reduction Regions of Construction Land: Evidence from Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Yiqun Wu & Yuan Sun & Congyue Zhou & Yonghua Li & Xuanli Wang & Huifang Yu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Carbon Emissions in Mixed-Use Villages: A Sustainable Development Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Bednarik, Zuzana, 2023. "The impact of health disparities on the subjective well-being in rural communities," NCR-Stat Discussion Papers 339129, North Central Regional Center for Rural Development (NCRCRD).
    12. Xuefeng Hou & Dianfeng Zhang & Liyuan Fu & Fu Zeng & Qing Wang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination Degree between Urban–Rural Integration and Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Sentao Wu & Xin Deng & Yanbin Qi, 2022. "Factors Driving Coordinated Development of Urban Green Economy: An Empirical Evidence from the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Mikko Weckroth & Sanna Ala-Mantila & Dimitris Ballas & Thanasis Ziogas & Jonna Ikonen, 2022. "Urbanity, Neighbourhood Characteristics and Perceived Quality of Life (QoL): Analysis of Individual and Contextual Determinants for Perceived QoL in 3300 Postal Code Areas in Finland," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 139-164, November.
    15. Tiepoh, M. Geepu Nah & Reimer, Bill, 2004. "Social capital, information flows, and income creation in rural Canada: a cross-community analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 427-448, September.
    16. María Salomé Ochoa-Rico & Juan Antonio Jimber-del Río & José Fernando Romero-Subia & Arnaldo Vergara-Romero, 2024. "Study of Citizen Satisfaction in Rural Versus Urban Areas in Public Services: Perspective of a Multi-group Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 87-110, January.
    17. Mawuli Asempah & Wahib Sahwan & Brigitta Schütt, 2021. "Assessment of Land Cover Dynamics and Drivers of Urban Expansion Using Geospatial and Logistic Regression Approach in Wa Municipality, Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Shen, Mingrui & Shen, Jianfa, 2018. "Evaluating the cooperative and family farm programs in China: A rural governance perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 240-250.
    19. Reimer, Bill & Lyons, Tara & Ferguson, Nelson & Polanco, Geraldina, 2007. "Social Capital as Social Relations: the contribution of normative structures," MPRA Paper 66489, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Xiaohu Liu & Lei Yuan & Gangyi Tan, 2023. "Identification and Hierarchy of Traditional Village Characteristics Based on Concentrated Contiguous Development—Taking 206 Traditional Villages in Hubei Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:14-:d:1009740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.