IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1393-d897041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delineation of the Development Boundary of the Central District of Zhengzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingeng Huo

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Zhenqin Shi

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
    Research Center of Regional Development and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
    Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Region, Henan University, Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Wenbo Zhu

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
    Research Center of Regional Development and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
    Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Region, Henan University, Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Xin Chen

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Hua Xue

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Ran Ma

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Yanhui Yan

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

Abstract

An urban development boundary is an effective means to guide urban development and restrain unplanned expansion of urban space. Scientifically-based delineation and control of the boundary can help with sustainable use of land resources and better spatial planning. This study took land use data from 2000, 2010, and 2020 for the central urban area of Zhengzhou and predicted the land use pattern in 2035. We used auto-logistic selection of driving factors, future land use simulation, and system dynamics models to delineate the development boundary of the central urban area. We complemented and optimized the boundary using agricultural and ecological perspectives. The results indicated the following: (1) The ROC values of land driving factors were greater than 0.75 in the regression test, and the Kappa and OA were greater than 0.92 in the accuracy test of land simulation results. (2) The boundary range initially delineated based on morphology was 2319 km 2 . There was a clear overall development trend of the central urban area to the east and southeast, which included the historical urban area of Zhengzhou and the new government planning area. (3) The optimized boundary of the central district area was 2209 km 2 , the ecological land control area was 136 km 2 , and the basic farmland protection area was 54 km 2 . The Yellow River, the airport, and the western, southern, and eastern areas were already formed. The study concluded that the delineated boundary was in line with the scientific concepts of ‘rigid’ and ‘flexible’ factors, which have positive effects on the protection of arable land resources and ecological land, as well as meeting the needs of urban development. The level of sustainable development of the region was effectively improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingeng Huo & Zhenqin Shi & Wenbo Zhu & Xin Chen & Hua Xue & Ran Ma & Yanhui Yan, 2022. "Delineation of the Development Boundary of the Central District of Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1393-:d:897041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Yi & Xi Guo & Yi Han & Jie Guo & Minghao Ou & Xiaomin Zhao, 2022. "Coupling Ecological Security Pattern Establishment and Construction Land Expansion Simulation for Urban Growth Boundary Delineation: Framework and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Jun Ma & Qiang Yu & Huiyuan Wang & Linzhe Yang & Ruirui Wang & Minzhe Fang, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of Wetland Landscape Ecological Network in Dongying City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Jingeng Huo & Zhenqin Shi & Wenbo Zhu & Tianqi Li & Hua Xue & Xin Chen & Yanhui Yan & Ran Ma, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Xindong He & Xianmin Mai & Guoqiang Shen, 2019. "Delineation of Urban Growth Boundaries with SD and CLUE-s Models under Multi-Scenarios in Chengdu Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Jiaojiao Luo & Wei Wang & Yuzhe Wu & Yi Peng & Linlin Zhang, 2021. "Analysis of an Urban Development Boundary Policy in China Based on the IAD Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Huang, Daquan & Huang, Jing & Liu, Tao, 2019. "Delimiting urban growth boundaries using the CLUE-S model with village administrative boundaries," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 422-435.
    7. Yaobin Liu & Lu Dai & Huanhuan Xiong, 2015. "Simulation of urban expansion patterns by integrating auto-logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(6), pages 1113-1136, June.
    8. Harini Nagendra, 2011. "Urban Green Belts in the Twenty-first Century," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 706-708.
    9. Gerardo del Cerro Santamaría, 2018. "Leslie Sklair 2017: The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities and Capitalist Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 956-958, September.
    10. Mingjie Song & DongMei Chen & Katie Woodstock & Zuo Zhang & Yuling Wu, 2019. "An RP-MCE-SOP Framework for China’s County-Level “Three-Space” and “Three-Line” Planning—An Integration of Rational Planning, Multi-Criteria Evaluation, and Spatial Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yangcheng Hu & Yi Liu & Changyan Li, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Menglin Ou & Jingye Li & Xin Fan & Jian Gong, 2022. "Compound Optimization of Territorial Spatial Structure and Layout at the City Scale from “Production–Living–Ecological” Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Chunhong Zhao & Jennifer L.R. Jensen & Russell Weaver, 2020. "Global and Local Modeling of Land Use Change in the Border Cities of Laredo, Texas, USA and Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, Mexico: A Comparative Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Yang Zhang & Xiaojiang Xia & Jiandong Li & Luge Xing & Chengchao Yang & Haofeng Wang & Xiaoai Dai & Jue Wang, 2024. "Simulation of Urban Growth Boundary under the Guidance of Stock Development: A Case Study of Wuhan City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Zechen Wang & Zhenqin Shi & Jingeng Huo & Wenbo Zhu & Yanhui Yan & Na Ding, 2023. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Funiu Mountain Area Based on MSPA and MCR Models, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Changqing Sun & Yulong Bao & Battsengel Vandansambuu & Yuhai Bao, 2022. "Simulation and Prediction of Land Use/Cover Changes Based on CLUE-S and CA-Markov Models: A Case Study of a Typical Pastoral Area in Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin & Zibibula Simayi & Ayinuer Mamat & Bumairiyemu Maimaiti & Yunfei Ma, 2023. "FLUS Based Modeling of the Urban LULC in Arid and Semi-Arid Region of Northwest China: A Case Study of Urumqi City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Xiaoyang Liu & Weihao Shi & Sen Zhang, 2022. "Progress of Research on Urban Growth Boundary and Its Implications in Chinese Studies Based on Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Somayeh Ahani & Hashem Dadashpoor, 2021. "Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: a review and proposed framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14215-14244, October.
    10. Xindong He & Linhong Wu & Guoqiang Shen & Xingfan Peng & Lei Huang, 2023. "A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Ecological–Economic Coupling Coordination in the Chengdu–Chongqing Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Xiaohuan Xie & Haifeng Deng & Shengyuan Li & Zhonghua Gou, 2024. "Optimizing Land Use for Carbon Neutrality: Integrating Photovoltaic Development in Lingbao, Henan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Gupta, Pranav & Bharat, Alka & McCullen, Nick & Kershaw, Tristan, 2025. "Promoting sustainable land management: An innovative approach to land-take decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Yan Yu & Chenhe Zhang & Weilin Ma & Yaxin Xu & Xinxin Gao, 2022. "Urban Growth Boundaries Delineation under Multi-Objective Constraints from the Perspective of Humanism and Low-Carbon Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Haitao Ji & Xiaoshun Li & Yiwei Geng & Xin Chen & Yuexiang Wang & Jumei Cheng & Zhuang Chen, 2023. "Delineation of Urban Development Boundary and Carbon Emission Effects in Xuzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Linlin Wang & Zhuo Li & Chengcheng Yuan & Liming Liu, 2024. "Exploration on the reasons for low efficiency of arable land protection policy in China: an evolutionary game theoretic model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25173-25198, October.
    17. Ziwei Luo & Xijun Hu & Yezi Wang & Cunyou Chen, 2023. "Simulation and Prediction of Territorial Spatial Layout at the Lake-Type Basin Scale: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Basin in China from 2000 to 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Jie Liu & Lang Zhang & Qingping Zhang, 2019. "The Development Simulation of Urban Green Space System Layout Based on the Land Use Scenario: A Case Study of Xuchang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Mengjing Wang & Walter Timo de Vries & Wanchen Sang & Haijun Bao & Yuefeng Lyu & Sheng Liu, 2025. "A Method for Delineating Urban Development Boundaries Based on the Urban–Rural Integration Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Xinyu Yan & Muyi Huang & Yuru Tang & Qin Guo & Xue Wu & Guozhao Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Dynamic Change of Land Use in Megacities and Its Impact on Ecosystem Services and Modeling Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-28, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1393-:d:897041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.