IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p800-d826683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Spatial Criteria Method to Delimit Rural Settlements towards Boundaries Equity: Land Use Optimization for Decision Making in Galicia, NW Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Vasco Barbosa

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía 140013, Colombia
    Prometheus, Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, Praça Gen. Barbosa 44, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    Department of Sociology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2000-2199, South Africa)

  • Inés Santé-Riveira

    (Department of Agroforestry Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, LaboraTe, 27002 Lugo, Spain)

  • Rafael Crecente-Maseda

    (Department of Agroforestry Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, LaboraTe, 27002 Lugo, Spain)

  • Carlos Díaz Redondo

    (Agency for Rural Development of the Xunta de Galicia (AGADER), Lugar da Barcia, 56. Laraño, 15897 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Juan Porta Trinidad

    (Computer Architecture Group, Universidade da Coruña, CITIC, 15071 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Jorge Parapar López

    (Computer Architecture Group, Universidade da Coruña, CITIC, 15071 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Ramón Doallo Biempica

    (Computer Architecture Group, Universidade da Coruña, CITIC, 15071 A Coruña, Spain)

  • José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto

    (Department of Rural Economics, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Rural settlements (RS) are a reality of rural areas. They consist of cluster of buildings and ways of life mainly associated with activities related to agriculture. As economic policies applied in rural development have evolved, the physical delimitation of rural areas has become more important because such areas are recipients of financial support, which depends on an area’s characteristics. Thus, it is necessary to formulate a new spatial approach for RS delimitation. The objective of this study is to define spatial criteria for identification and delimitation of the RS to recognize the morphological context of each RS. With respect to methodology, RS in the community of Galicia, Northwestern Spain were studied, and factors for spatial characterization were defined according to experts’ evaluations. Subsequently, spatial restrictions and conditions were identified for the delimitation of boundaries. The criteria that this research proposes reveal numerically adjustable factors that can recognize and interpret the morphological characteristics of each RS, which is also evidenced by the results of RS delimitations. It can be concluded that the numerically defined criteria associated with a spatial operation allow the adaptation to the morphological characteristics of any RS, as well as spatial equity by recognizing the differentiation of building structures and land uses of each RS, rather unlike the criteria defined by the law.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasco Barbosa & Inés Santé-Riveira & Rafael Crecente-Maseda & Carlos Díaz Redondo & Juan Porta Trinidad & Jorge Parapar López & Ramón Doallo Biempica & José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto, 2022. "A New Spatial Criteria Method to Delimit Rural Settlements towards Boundaries Equity: Land Use Optimization for Decision Making in Galicia, NW Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:800-:d:826683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patsy Healey, 2004. "The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 45-67, March.
    2. Oleg GORB & Ilona YASNOLOB & Dedukhno ALLA & Yulia KALIUZHNA, 2017. "The Formation of the Management System of Ecological Social and Economic Development of Rural Territories Using the Experience in European Union," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 516-528.
    3. Costis Hadjimichalis, 2003. "Imagining Rurality in the New Europe and Dilemmas for Spatial Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 103-113, March.
    4. Yan Mao & Yanfang Liu & Haofeng Wang & Wei Tang & Xuesong Kong, 2017. "A Spatial-Territorial Reorganization Model of Rural Settlements Based on Graph Theory and Genetic Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Jeffrey L. Olson & Darla K. Munroe, 2012. "Natural amenities and rural development in new urban-rural spaces," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 355-371, November.
    6. Andrzej Rosner & Monika Wesołowska, 2020. "Deagrarianisation of the Economic Structure and the Evolution of Rural Settlement Patterns in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Alexander Trukhachev, 2015. "Methodology for Evaluating the Rural Tourism Potentials: A Tool to Ensure Sustainable Development of Rural Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Zhao, Pengjun & Wan, Jie, 2021. "Land use and travel burden of residents in urban fringe and rural areas: An evaluation of urban-rural integration initiatives in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Bas Pedroli & Teresa Pinto Correia & Jørgen Primdahl, 2016. "Challenges for a shared European countryside of uncertain future. Towards a modern community-based landscape perspective," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 450-460, May.
    10. Vasco Barbosa-Brandão & Inés Santé Riveira & Rafael Crecente Maseda, 2015. "Evolution of Legal Criteria for the Identification and Zoning of Rural Settlements in Galicia, NW Spain," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 398-429, February.
    11. Claude Lacour & Sylvette Puissant, 2007. "Re-Urbanity : urbanising the Rural and Ruralising the Urban," Post-Print hal-00154248, HAL.
    12. Enrique Benavent & David Soler, 1999. "The Directed Rural Postman Problem with Turn Penalties," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 408-418, November.
    13. Jørgen Primdahl & Veerle Van Eetvelde & Teresa Pinto-Correia, 2020. "Rural Landscapes—Challenges and Solutions to Landscape Governance," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-6, December.
    14. Mortoja, Md. Golam & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Mayere, Severine, 2020. "What is the most suitable methodological approach to demarcate peri-urban areas? A systematic review of the literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qinglei Zhao & Guanghui Jiang & Wenqiu Ma & Yuting Yang & Tao Zhou, 2023. "The Resource Potential and Optimization of Rural Housing Land under Utility Structure Evaluation in Metropolitan Suburbs Villages of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Bin Zhu & Hongbo Li & Zhengyu Hu & Yuling Wen & Jili Che, 2022. "An Evaluation and Optimization of the Spatial Pattern of County Rural Settlements: A Case Study of Changshu City in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Zhiyuan Yang & Dong Yang & Jingjie Geng & Fengxia Tian, 2022. "Evaluation of Suitability and Spatial Distribution of Rural Settlements in the Karst Mountainous Area of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Gottero & Claudia Cassatella & Federica Larcher, 2021. "Planning Peri-Urban Open Spaces: Methods and Tools for Interpretation and Classification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Baldwin, Claudia & Hamerlinck, Jeff & McKinlay, Anna, 2023. "Institutional support for building resilience within rural communities characterised by multifunctional land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & Fernando Pérez-Rodríguez & José María Martín-Martín & João C. Azevedo, 2019. "Planning for Democracy in Protected Rural Areas: Application of a Voting Method in a Spanish-Portuguese Reserve," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Avram, Daniel, 2016. "Ways of increasing the visibility of the Romanian rural tourism," MPRA Paper 76894, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Nancy Andrea Ramírez-Agudelo & Roger Porcar Anento & Miriam Villares & Elisabet Roca, 2020. "Nature-Based Solutions for Water Management in Peri-Urban Areas: Barriers and Lessons Learned from Implementation Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-36, November.
    8. Yue Peng & Hui Qiu & Xinlu Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Spatial Functions on the Public Space System of Traditional Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Peng Wang & Yihui He & Kengcheng Zheng, 2023. "Effects of the Implementation of the Broadband China Policy (BCP) on House Prices: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Alberto Amore & C Michael Hall & John Jenkins, 2017. "They never said ‘Come here and let's talk about it’: Exclusion and non-decision-making in the rebuild of Christchurch, New Zealand," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(7), pages 617-639, November.
    11. Banai, Reza & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2011. "A measure of regional influence with the analytic network process," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 165-173, December.
    12. Brinkley, Catherine & Raj, Subhashni, 2022. "Perfusion and urban thickness: The shape of cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    13. Hua Xia & Shidong Ge & Xinyu Zhang & Gunwoo Kim & Yakai Lei & Yang Liu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Green Infrastructure in an Agricultural Peri-Urban Area: A Case Study of Baisha District in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Sungsoo Yoon & Youngjoo Moon & Jinah Jeong & Chan-Ryul Park & Wanmo Kang, 2021. "A Network-Based Approach for Reducing Pedestrian Exposure to PM 2.5 Induced by Road Traffic in Seoul," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Melika Levelt & Leonie Janssen-Jansen, 2013. "The Amsterdam Metropolitan Area Challenge: Opportunities for Inclusive Coproduction in City-Region Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 540-555, June.
    16. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    17. D Soler & E Martínez & J C Micó, 2008. "A transformation for the mixed general routing problem with turn penalties," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(4), pages 540-547, April.
    18. Jamie Gillen, 2016. "Bringing the countryside to the city: Practices and imaginations of the rural in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 324-337, February.
    19. Tian Tian & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Pursuing Development behind Heterogeneous Ideologies: Review of Six Evolving Themes and Narratives of Rural Planning in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:800-:d:826683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.