IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p531-d787646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Trees in the Arctic City: Case of Nadym

Author

Listed:
  • Oleg Sizov

    (Laboratory of Integrated Geological and Geophysical Studies, Oil and Gas Research Institute RAS, 3 Gubkina Str., 119333 Moscow, Russia
    Department of Geoecology, Gubkin Oil and Gas University, 65/1 Leninskiy Prospect, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Roman Fedorov

    (Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RAS, 86 Malygina Str., 625026 Tyumen, Russia r_fedorov@mail.ru
    Department of Methodology of Cryosphere Interdisciplinary Studies, Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RAS, 86 Malygina Str., 625026 Tyumen, Russia)

  • Yulia Pechkina

    (Environment Sector, Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, 20 Respubliki Str., 629008 Salekhard, Russia)

  • Vera Kuklina

    (Department of Geography, George Washington University, 2036 H St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Maxim Michugin

    (Department of Geoecology, Gubkin Oil and Gas University, 65/1 Leninskiy Prospect, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey Soromotin

    (Department of Methodology of Cryosphere Interdisciplinary Studies, Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RAS, 86 Malygina Str., 625026 Tyumen, Russia
    Institute of Ecology and Natural Resurces Management, University of Tyumen, 6 Volodarskogo Str., 625003 Tyumen, Russia)

Abstract

Trees in Arctic cities perform not only important provisional and regulating ecosystem services, but also bring predominantly settler population closer to the visual images and household standards of their home southern regions. However, maintenance of green infrastructure in the Arctic has specific difficulties associated with the harsh climatic and environmental conditions. This paper focuses on state and dynamics of vegetation in the city of Nadym, Russia, with a particular focus on native and introduced trees as the main ecosystem service providers and an articulation of local values towards green spaces. The research is based on interdisciplinary approach which includes interviews with local residents, geobotanical survey and analysis of remote sensing data. The results of the study show that maintaining of natural vegetation requires specific measures due to environmental the critical impact of anthropogenic activity. The active introduction of plants from more southern regions is manifested both in the deliberate practice of landscaping the city’s streets and courtyards, and in spontaneous attempts to introduce plants from more southern (not Subarctic) agricultural regions of Russia, which are privately brought by city residents from other regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleg Sizov & Roman Fedorov & Yulia Pechkina & Vera Kuklina & Maxim Michugin & Andrey Soromotin, 2022. "Urban Trees in the Arctic City: Case of Nadym," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:531-:d:787646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malinauskaite, Laura & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Ögmundardóttir, Helga & Roman, Joe, 2019. "Ecosystem services in the Arctic: a thematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Kronenberg, Jakub, 2015. "Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 218-227.
    3. Shanshan Chen & Dagmar Haase & Bing Xue & Thilo Wellmann & Salman Qureshi, 2021. "Integrating Quantity and Quality to Assess Urban Green Space Improvement in the Compact City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Gómez-Baggethun, Erik & Barton, David N., 2013. "Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 235-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongwoo Lee & Kyushik Oh & Jungeun Suh, 2022. "Diagnosis and Prioritization of Vulnerable Areas of Urban Ecosystem Regulation Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Tapio Riepponen & Mikko Moilanen & Jaakko Simonen, 2023. "Themes of resilience in the economics literature: A topic modeling approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 326-356, April.
    3. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Xin Li & Huadong Guo & Guodong Cheng & Xiaoyu Song & Youhua Ran & Min Feng & Tao Che & Xinwu Li & Lei Wang & Anmin Duan & Donghui Shangguan & Deliang Chen & Rui Jin & Jie Deng & Jianbin Su & Bin Cao, 2025. "Polar regions are critical in achieving global sustainable development goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Yangang Xing & Phil Jones & Iain Donnison, 2017. "Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Evans, Nicole M. & Carrozzino-Lyon, Amy L. & Galbraith, Betsy & Noordyk, Julia & Peroff, Deidre M. & Stoll, John & Thompson, Aaron & Winden, Matthew W. & Davis, Mark A., 2019. "Integrated ecosystem service assessment for landscape conservation design in the Green Bay watershed, Wisconsin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    8. Massoni, Emma Soy & Barton, David N. & Rusch, Graciela M. & Gundersen, Vegard, 2018. "Bigger, more diverse and better? Mapping structural diversity and its recreational value in urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 502-516.
    9. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Park, Mi Sun & Shin, Seongmin & Lee, Haeun, 2021. "Media frames on urban greening in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Christoph Schneider & Bianca Achilles & Hendrik Merbitz, 2014. "Urbanity and Urbanization: An Interdisciplinary Review Combining Cultural and Physical Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Gallez, Elsa & Canters, Frank & Gadeyne, Sylvie & Baró, Francesc, 2024. "A multi-indicator distributive justice approach to assess school-related green infrastructure benefits in Brussels," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Jonas Smit Andersen & Sara Maria Lerer & Antje Backhaus & Marina Bergen Jensen & Hjalte Jomo Danielsen Sørup, 2017. "Characteristic Rain Events: A Methodology for Improving the Amenity Value of Stormwater Control Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Jeroen Degerickx & Martin Hermy & Ben Somers, 2020. "Mapping Functional Urban Green Types Using High Resolution Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-35, March.
    15. Jingheng Wang & Meichen Fu & Xiangxue Han & Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen, 2025. "Research on Human Needs and the Valorization of Supply–Need Relationships in Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Southwest Karst Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Cooper, Nigel & Brady, Emily & Steen, Helen & Bryce, Rosalind, 2016. "Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 218-229.
    17. Heather L Reynolds & Leslie Brandt & Burnell C Fischer & Brady S Hardiman & Donovan J Moxley & Eric Sandweiss & James H Speer & Songlin Fei, 2020. "Implications of climate change for managing urban green infrastructure: an Indiana, US case study," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 1967-1984, December.
    18. Holt, Alison R. & Mears, Meghann & Maltby, Lorraine & Warren, Philip, 2015. "Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 33-46.
    19. Riccardo Petrini & Lisa Ghezzi & Simone Arrighi & Lisa Genovesi & Chiara Frassi & Luca Pandolfi, 2022. "Trace Elements in Soil and Urban Groundwater in an Area Impacted by Metallurgical Activity: Health Risk Assessment in the Historical Barga Municipality (Tuscany, Italy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Shishay Kiros Weldegebriel & Kumelachew Yeshitela, 2021. "Measuring the Semi-Century Ecosystem-Service Value Variation in Mekelle City Region, Northern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:531-:d:787646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.