IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i12p2205-d993830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Policy and Institutional Arrangements for Urban Green Space Development in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Bayarmaa Enkhbold

    (School of Geology and Mining, Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Ulaanbaatar 14191, Mongolia)

  • Kenichi Matsui

    (Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan)

Abstract

Globally, authorities in rapidly growing cities have struggled to find sufficient green space for residents. Ulaanbaatar city of Mongolia has faced a similar situation due largely to drastically shrinking open land, especially after adopting a market-oriented economy in 1990. Amid the escalating urban congestion and growing concerns over pollution that ensued, the concept of urban green spaces began to gain more attention among Ulaanbaatar city officials. In 2014, the national government introduced the Green Development Policy to set aside 30% of the city’s residential area as green space by 2030. The Ulaanbaatar 2020 Master Plan and Development Approach for 2030 similarly set goals to increase green space per capita to 30 m 2 . However, the current share of green space in the city is only 1.8% and 0.12–5 m 2 /person. Most case studies on urban green space policies and institutional arrangements focus on large cities in European countries with a relatively low population growth rate compared to those in developing countries. Therefore, this paper attempts to understand why Ulaanbaatar has not been able to increase green space despite its ambitious policy goals for many years. To do so, we examined the policy documents and institutional arrangements. We also conducted personal interviews with government specialists. As a result, we found four main challenges: (1) actions to increase green space were weak; (2) action plans were not clearly laid out for government officials to follow; (3) where stakeholder coordination was needed, administrators did not have sufficient resources and frameworks to do so, and (4) promised plans were not financially feasible. Overall, these findings indicate a necessity to strengthen urban green space monitoring and sufficient budget mobilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayarmaa Enkhbold & Kenichi Matsui, 2022. "A Study on Policy and Institutional Arrangements for Urban Green Space Development in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2205-:d:993830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/12/2205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kronenberg, Jakub, 2015. "Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 218-227.
    2. Shibire Bekele Eshetu & Kumelachew Yeshitela & Stefan Sieber, 2021. "Urban Green Space Planning, Policy Implementation, and Challenges: The Case of Addis Ababa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Chakma Kisinger & Kenichi Matsui, 2021. "Responding to Climate-Induced Displacement in Bangladesh: A Governance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2018. "Modern Compact Cities: How Much Greenery Do We Need?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Norio Saito, 2013. "Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in least developed countries in South and Southeast Asia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 825-849, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Peter J. Irga & Fraser R. Torpy & Daniel Griffin & Sara J. Wilkinson, 2023. "Vertical Greening Systems: A Perspective on Existing Technologies and New Design Recommendation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Bayarmaa Enkhbold & Kenichi Matsui, 2021. "Community Perceptions about Participating in Urban Park Establishment in Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Sylvester Ngome Chisika & Chunho Yeom, 2023. "Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    5. Cécile Hérivaux & Philippe Le Coent, 2021. "Introducing Nature into Cities or Preserving Existing Peri-Urban Ecosystems? Analysis of Preferences in a Rapidly Urbanizing Catchment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-34, January.
    6. Oleg Sizov & Roman Fedorov & Yulia Pechkina & Vera Kuklina & Maxim Michugin & Andrey Soromotin, 2022. "Urban Trees in the Arctic City: Case of Nadym," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Hadi Alizadeh & Abolfazl Meshkini, 2025. "On the road to urban sustainability: identifying major barriers to urban sustainability in Iran," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(2), pages 351-376, June.
    8. Jordi Honey-Rosés & Oscar Zapata, 2023. "Green Spaces with Fewer People Improve Self-Reported Affective Experience and Mood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.
    9. Maria Stella Lux, 2024. "Networks and Fragments: An Integrative Approach for Planning Urban Green Infrastructures in Dense Urban Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Beata Calka & Katarzyna Siok & Marta Szostak & Elzbieta Bielecka & Tomasz Kogut & Mohamed Zhran, 2025. "Improvement of the Reliability of Urban Park Location Results Through the Use of Fuzzy Logic Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-28, January.
    11. Nop, Sothun, 2015. "Towards active community participation in implementing Climate Change Adaptation Policy (CCAP) in Cambodia," MPRA Paper 71656, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Kathryn Rodgman, Mary & Anguelovski, Isabelle & Pérez-del-Pulgar, Carmen & Shokry, Galia & Garcia-Lamarca, Melissa & Connolly, James J.T. & Baró, Francesc & Triguero-Mas, Margarita, 2024. "Perceived urban ecosystem services and disservices in gentrifying neighborhoods: Contrasting views between community members and state informants," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Asad Aziz & Muhammad Mushahid Anwar & Muhammad Majeed & Sammer Fatima & Syed Shajee Mehdi & Wali Muhammad Mangrio & Amine Elbouzidi & Muhammad Abdullah & Shadab Shaukat & Nafeesa Zahid & Eman A. Mahmo, 2023. "Quantifying Landscape and Social Amenities as Ecosystem Services in Rapidly Changing Peri-Urban Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, February.
    14. Gyanendra Karki & Balram Bhatta & Naba R Devkota & Ram P Acharya & Ripu M Kunwar, 2021. "Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) Interventions and Indicators in Nepal: Implications for Sustainable Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Jeba Humayra & Md. Kamal Uddin & Nusrat Yeasmin Pushpo, 2024. "Deficiencies of women's participation in climate governance and sustainable development challenges in Bangladesh," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 7096-7113, December.
    16. Sudarshan Chalise & Athula Naranpanawa, 2023. "Potential impacts of climate change and adaptation in agriculture on poverty: the case of Nepal," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 1540-1559, October.
    17. Zbigniew Szkop, 2017. "The problem of non-optimal management of urban green areas in Warsaw," Working Papers 2017-21, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    18. Parfait K. Kouamé & Gilbert Fokou & Amoin Jeanne d’Arc Koffi & Amidou Sani & Bassirou Bonfoh & Kouassi Dongo, 2022. "Assessing Institutional Stakeholders’ Perception and Limitations on Coping Strategies in Flooding Risk Management in West Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Barbara Ester Adele Piga & Gabriele Stancato & Nicola Rainisio & Marco Boffi, 2021. "How Do Nature-Based Solutions’ Color Tones Influence People’s Emotional Reaction? An Assessment via Virtual and Augmented Reality in a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Argyro Anna Kanelli & Maria Lydia Vardaka & Chrisovaladis Malesios & Zainab Jamidu Katima & Olga-Ioanna Kalantzi, 2024. "Can Campus Green Spaces Be Restorative? A Case Study from Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:12:p:2205-:d:993830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.