IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1654-d924841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Cognition of Urban Spatial Image at Community Scale: A Case Study of Jinghu Community in Zhengzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaowen Zhou

    (School of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Hongwei Li

    (School of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Huili Zhang

    (School of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Rongrong Zhang

    (School of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Huan Li

    (School of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

The community is the basic spatial unit for urban residents to live and rest. It is a crucial direction of city image research to explore people’s cognitive characteristics of community space image. Aiming at the lack of cognitive quantification of community spatial images, a new method that can quantify community spatial data into cognitive results is proposed. By employing spatial analysis tools, eleven spatial indicators from the perspective of community spatial form and spatial services are selected, and an image structure is constructed based on the characteristics of the indicator results. The results of multiple indicators are organized through the improved technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and overlay analysis method to produce a spatial image map of the community. The study displays that the spatial image characteristics of the community scale can be comprehensively expressed through three types of elements: district, path (edge), and node (landmark). These three types of elements constitute the image structure at the community scale and present apparent elements’ characteristics. This scrutiny is also aimed to demonstrate the construction and use process of the methodology and to provide new ideas for the cognitive research of urban spatial image at the community scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaowen Zhou & Hongwei Li & Huili Zhang & Rongrong Zhang & Huan Li, 2022. "A Study on the Cognition of Urban Spatial Image at Community Scale: A Case Study of Jinghu Community in Zhengzhou City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1654-:d:924841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Luan & Daniel Fuller, 2022. "Urban form in Canada at a small-area level: Quantifying “compactness†and “sprawl†with bayesian multivariate spatial factor analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(4), pages 1300-1313, May.
    2. Stylidis, Dimitrios & Shani, Amir & Belhassen, Yaniv, 2017. "Testing an integrated destination image model across residents and tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 184-195.
    3. He Liu & Xueming Li, 2022. "Understanding the Driving Factors for Urban Human Settlement Vitality at Street Level: A Case Study of Dalian, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Anna Małgorzata Jachimowicz, 2022. "Morphology of Warsaw City Structure Using Urban Indexes and GIS Tools," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Yidan Cao & Xiaomin Tang, 2022. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Community Public Open Space Renewal: A Case Study of the Ruijin Community, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Yilei Tao & Ying Wang & Xinyu Wang & Guohang Tian & Shumei Zhang, 2022. "Measuring the Correlation between Human Activity Density and Streetscape Perceptions: An Analysis Based on Baidu Street View Images in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Yakup Çelikbilek & Fatih Tüysüz, 2020. "An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 281-300, April.
    8. Chun Fu & Xiaoqiang Tu & An Huang, 2021. "Identification and Characterization of Production–Living–Ecological Space in a Central Urban Area Based on POI Data: A Case Study for Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Rowland Atkinson, 2012. "Gated Communities in China: Class, Privilege and the Moral Politics of the Good Life – By Choon‐Piew Pow," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 196-197, January.
    10. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    11. Andrew Mondschein & Steven T. Moga, 2018. "New Directions in Cognitive-Environmental Research," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(3-4), pages 263-275, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruoshi Zhang, 2023. "Evaluation of Emotional Attachment Characteristics of Small-Scale Urban Vitality Space Based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Integrating Entropy Weight Method and Gr," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Xiaowen Zhou & Hongwei Li & Jian Xu & Qingzhen Sun, 2024. "Urban Spatial Image Acquisition and Examination Based on Geographic Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thanh Quang Nguyen & Sonia Longo & Maurizio Cellura & Le Quyen Luu & Alessandra Bertoli & Letizia Bua, 2024. "Evaluating and Prioritizing Circular Supply Chain Alternatives in the Energy Context with a Holistic Multi-Indicator Decision Support System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-32, October.
    2. Jinkun Yang & Linchuan Yang & Haitao Ma, 2022. "Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Chaharborj, Sarkhosh Seddighi & Nabi, Khondoker Nazmoon & Feng, Koo Lee & Chaharborj, Shahriar Seddighi & Phang, Pei See, 2022. "Controlling COVID-19 transmission with isolation of influential nodes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Nondy, J. & Gogoi, T.K., 2021. "Performance comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for exergetic and exergoenvironomic optimization of a benchmark combined heat and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Cheon Yu & Yun Seop Hwang, 2019. "Do the Social Responsibility Efforts of the Destination Affect the Loyalty of Tourists?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Karol Kuczera & Damian Dziembek, 2024. "Changes in the Image of Szczecin between 2013 and 2023 in Empirical Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 894-910.
    7. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Yuan-Wei Du & Yi-Pin Fan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Study across 30 Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Targetti, Stefano & Schaller, Lena L. & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2021. "A fuzzy cognitive mapping approach for the assessment of public-goods governance in agricultural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Shuyang Yu & Dan Wang, 2022. "Quantitative SWOT Analysis on Factors Influencing the Sustainable Development of Non-Academic Education in China’s Open Universities: A Case Study of Beijing Open University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Darie Gavrilut & Ke Xue, 2021. "Social Media-Based Content towards Image Formation: A New Approach to the Selection of Sustainable Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    13. Rehmat Karim & Normah Abdul Latip & Azizan Marzuki & Attaullah Shah & Faqeer Muhammad, 2021. "Impact of Supply Components-4As on Tourism Development: Case of Central Karakoram National Park, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 411-424.
    14. Alisa Kazakova & Meerim Karimova & Insin Kim, 2021. "Examining Rapport with Local People, International Students’ Roles through Travel Experience and Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Feng Xu & Wenxia Niu & Shuaishuai Li & Yuli Bai, 2020. "The Mechanism of Word-of-Mouth for Tourist Destinations in Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    16. Hossin, Md. Altab & Abudu, Hermas & Katsekpor, Johnson & Lei, Mu & Botah, Elvis Banoemuleng, 2025. "Tracking sustainable energy indicators in Africa: New evidence from technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    17. Wenqing Fu & Renfeng Ma & Xianjun Liang & Yiran Zhao & Lingzhi Wu & Maoyu Luo & Yanjun Mao, 2023. "Perception Analysis of the Transformation from a Fishery-Led to Industry-Led Island with its Human Settlement Changes: A Case Study of Liuheng Island, Zhoushan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Jing-Wei Liu & Che-Wei Chang & Yao-Ji Wang & Yi-Hui Liu, 2022. "Constructing a Decision Model for Health Club Members to Purchase Coaching Programs during the COVID-19 Epidemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Dewey Wollmann & Maria Teresinha Arns Steiner, 2017. "The Strategic Decision-Making as a Complex Adaptive System: A Conceptual Scientific Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, January.
    20. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1654-:d:924841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.