IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i7p731-d592873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Method for the Generation of Consistent Mapping to Monitoring Land Cover Change: A Case Study of Guerrero State in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • René Vázquez-Jiménez

    (Cuerpo Académico UAGro CA-93 Riesgos Naturales y Geotecnología, FI, Research Group on Technologies for Landscape Analysis and Diagnosis (TADAT), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Av. Lázaro Cárdenas s/n, CU, 39070 Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico)

  • Raúl Romero-Calcerrada

    (Research Group on Technologies for Landscape Analysis and Diagnosis (TADAT), Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Paseo de los Artilleros s/n., Vicálvaro, 28032 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rocío N. Ramos-Bernal

    (Cuerpo Académico UAGro CA-93 Riesgos Naturales y Geotecnología, FI, Research Group on Technologies for Landscape Analysis and Diagnosis (TADAT), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Av. Lázaro Cárdenas s/n, CU, 39070 Chilpancingo, Guerrero, Mexico)

  • Patricia Arrogante-Funes

    (Research Group on Technologies for Landscape Analysis and Diagnosis (TADAT), Departamento de Tecnología Química y Ambiental, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, C/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carlos J. Novillo

    (Research Group on Technologies for Landscape Analysis and Diagnosis (TADAT), Departamento de Tecnología Química y Ambiental, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, C/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Land cover is crucial for ecosystems and human activities. Therefore, monitoring land cover changes has become relevant in recent years. This study proposes an alternative method based on conventional change detection techniques combined with maximum likelihood (MaxLike) supervised classification of satellite images to generate consistent Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) maps. The novelty of this method is that the supervised classification is applied in an earlier stage of change detection exclusively to identified dynamics zones. The LULC categories of the stable zones are acquired from an initial date’s previously elaborated base map. The methodology comprised the use of Landsat images from 2011 and 2016, applying the Sun Canopy Sensor (SCS + C) topographic correction model enhanced through the classification of slopes, using derived topographic corrected images with NDVI, and employing Tasseled Cap (TC) Brightness-Greenness-Wetness indices and Principal Components (PCs). The study incorporated a comparative analysis of the consistency of the LULC mapping, which is generated based on control areas. The results show that the proposed method, although slightly laborious, is viable and fully automatable. The generated LULC map is accurate and robust and achieves a Kappa concordance index of 87.53. Furthermore, the boundary consistency was visually superior to the conventional classified map.

Suggested Citation

  • René Vázquez-Jiménez & Raúl Romero-Calcerrada & Rocío N. Ramos-Bernal & Patricia Arrogante-Funes & Carlos J. Novillo, 2021. "An Alternative Method for the Generation of Consistent Mapping to Monitoring Land Cover Change: A Case Study of Guerrero State in Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:731-:d:592873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/731/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/731/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Maria Rojas & César Augusto Ruiz–Agudelo & María Claudia Diazgranados & Henry Polanco & Richard Anderson, 2019. "Approach to an integral valuation of mangrove’s ecosystem services in a marine protected area. Colombian Pacific region," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 322-342, July.
    2. Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho & Daniel Curtis Nepstad & Lisa M. Curran & Gustavo Coutinho Cerqueira & Ricardo Alexandrino Garcia & Claudia Azevedo Ramos & Eliane Voll & Alice McDonald & Paul Lefebvre, 2006. "Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7083), pages 520-523, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Amalia Niță & Mirela Mazilu & Gheorghe Curcan, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Trends of Major Agricultural Crops in Romania Using Interactive Geographic Information System Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sébastien Marchand, 2011. "Technical Efficiency, Farm Size and Tropical Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazonian Forest," Working Papers halshs-00552981, HAL.
    2. Claudia Suzanne Marie Nathalie Vitel & Gabriel Cardoso Carrero & Mariano Colini Cenamo & Maya Leroy & Paulo Mauricio Lima A. Graça & Philip Martin Fearnside, 2013. "Land-use Change Modeling in a Brazilian Indigenous Reserve: Construction of a Reference Scenario for the Suruí REDD Project," Post-Print hal-01466513, HAL.
    3. Jose Manuel Ochoa-Quintero & Charlotte H. Chang & Toby A. Gardner & Mariluce Rezende Messias & William J. Sutherland & Fernanda A. C. Delben, 2017. "Habitat Loss on Rondon’s Marmoset Potential Distribution," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. José Gomis-Cebolla & Juan C. Jiménez-Muñoz & José A. Sobrino, 2016. "MODIS-Based Monthly LST Products over Amazonia under Different Cloud Mask Schemes," Data, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Santos, Mário & Bastos, Rita & Cabral, João Alexandre, 2013. "Converting conventional ecological datasets in dynamic and dynamic spatially explicit simulations: Current advances and future applications of the Stochastic Dynamic Methodology (StDM)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 91-100.
    6. Bernardo F. T. Rudorff & Marcos Adami & Joel Risso & Daniel Alves De Aguiar & Bernardo Pires & Daniel Amaral & Leandro Fabiani & Izabel Cecarelli, 2012. "Remote Sensing Images to Detect Soy Plantations in the Amazon Biome—The Soy Moratorium Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(5), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Kaushal, Kevin R. & Navrud, Ståle, 2018. "Global Biodiversity Costs of Climate Change. Improving the damage assessment of species loss in Integrated Assessment Models," Working Paper Series 4-2018, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    8. Changjun Gu & Pei Zhao & Qiong Chen & Shicheng Li & Lanhui Li & Linshan Liu & Yili Zhang, 2020. "Forest Cover Change and the Effectiveness of Protected Areas in the Himalaya since 1998," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Courage Kamusoko & Yukio Wada & Toru Furuya & Shunsuke Tomimura & Mitsuru Nasu & Khamma Homsysavath, 2013. "Simulating Future Forest Cover Changes in Pakxeng District, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR): Implications for Sustainable Forest Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Iana Rufino & Slobodan Djordjević & Higor Costa de Brito & Priscila Barros Ramalho Alves, 2021. "Multi-Temporal Built-Up Grids of Brazilian Cities: How Trends and Dynamic Modelling Could Help on Resilience Challenges?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. A.S. Duden & P.A. Verweij & A.P.C. Faaij & D. Baisero & C. Rondinini & F. van der Hilst, 2020. "Biodiversity Impacts of Increased Ethanol Production in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. de Oliveira Barros, Erison Rosa & Oliveira de Andrade, Maurício & de Souza Júnior, Fernando Lourenço, 2022. "Time-space modeling of irregular occupations around Brazilian highways, based on static grids: Case study of BR-408," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Miranda, J. & Borner, J. & Kalkuhl, M. & Soares-Filho, B., 2018. "Land speculation and conservation policy leakage in Brazil," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277285, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Michael Getzner & Muhammad Shariful Islam, 2020. "Ecosystem Services of Mangrove Forests: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Economic Values," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Alessandra La Notte & Sonia Marongiu & Mauro Masiero & Pietro Molfetta & Riccardo Molignoni & Luca Cesaro, 2015. "Livestock and Ecosystem Services: An Exploratory Approach to Assess Agri-Environment-Climate Payments of RDP in Trentino," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Campos, Pedro Bueno Rocha & Almeida, Cláudia Maria de & Queiroz, Alfredo Pereira de, 2018. "Educational infrastructure and its impact on urban land use change in a peri-urban area: a cellular-automata based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 774-788.
    17. Syed Amir Manzoor & Geoffrey Griffiths & David Christian Rose & Martin Lukac, 2021. "The Return of Wooded Landscapes in Wales: An Exploration of Possible Post-Brexit Futures," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Ian A. MacKenzie & Markus Ohndorf & Charles Palmer, 2012. "Enforcement-proof contracts with moral hazard in precaution: ensuring 'permanence' in carbon sequestration," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 350-374, April.
    19. França, Filipe & Solar, Ricardo & Lees, Alexander C. & Martins, Lucas Pereira & Berenguer, Erika & Barlow, Jos, 2021. "Reassessing the role of cattle and pasture in Brazil's deforestation: A response to “Fire, deforestation, and livestock: When the smoke clears”," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. de Souza, Rodrigo Antônio & De Marco, Paulo, 2018. "Improved spatial model for Amazonian deforestation: An empirical assessment and spatial bias analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 387(C), pages 1-9.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:731-:d:592873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.