IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1147-d666629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Socio-Ecological System of a Protected Area in the Yucatan Peninsula: A Case Study on Land-Use, Vegetation Cover, and Household Management Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Martha Bonilla-Moheno

    (Red de Ambiente y Sustentabilidad, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa 91073, Mexico)

  • Coral E. Rangel Rivera

    (Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR) Unidad Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Calle Hornos Núm. 1003, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlán 71230, Mexico)

  • Eduardo García-Frapolli

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda San José de la Huerta, Morelia 58190, Mexico)

  • Fernanda L. Ríos Beltrán

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda San José de la Huerta, Morelia 58190, Mexico)

  • Celene Espadas-Manrique

    (Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida 97000, Mexico)

  • Filippo Aureli

    (Instituto de Neuroetologia, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa 91000, Mexico
    ConMonoMaya A.C., Chemax, Yucatán 97770, Mexico)

  • Bárbara Ayala-Orozco

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex-Hacienda San José de la Huerta, Morelia 58190, Mexico)

  • Gabriel Ramos-Fernández

    (ConMonoMaya A.C., Chemax, Yucatán 97770, Mexico
    Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Escolar 3000, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán 04510, Mexico
    Unidad Interdisciplinaria en Ingeniería y Tecnologías Avanzadas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Avenida Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2580, La Laguna Ticomán, Ciudad de Mexico 07340, Mexico
    Centro de Ciencias de la Complejidad (C3), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Circuito Mario de La Cueva 20, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán 04510, Mexico)

Abstract

Protected areas (PA) are effective means for protecting biodiversity, but less is known about their effect on the social-ecological system (SES). Using a semi-experimental approach and a descriptive case study based evaluation, we analyzed the effect of a PA in the Yucatan Peninsula on land-cover and household resource management strategies in time and space (before and after the PA establishment; inside and outside its limits). To assess the changes of land-use practices in the areas surrounding the communities inside and outside the PA, and their change over time (from 2003 to 2015), we used remote sensing analysis and semi-structured interviews. Our results show that after the PA was established, the forest increased and agricultural plots decreased inside and to a lesser extent outside the PA. However, fires reduced the area of old-growth forest and increased young secondary forest, highlighting the system’s vulnerability to uncommon events. Resource management strategies were also affected: while inside the PA households tended toward specializing on tourism, outside the PA household strategies implied a diversification of productive activities. Overall, the establishment of the PA proved to be an effective tool to promote forest recovery and prevent deforestation in the regions surrounding the communities both inside and outside the PA.

Suggested Citation

  • Martha Bonilla-Moheno & Coral E. Rangel Rivera & Eduardo García-Frapolli & Fernanda L. Ríos Beltrán & Celene Espadas-Manrique & Filippo Aureli & Bárbara Ayala-Orozco & Gabriel Ramos-Fernández, 2021. "Changes in the Socio-Ecological System of a Protected Area in the Yucatan Peninsula: A Case Study on Land-Use, Vegetation Cover, and Household Management Strategies," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1147-:d:666629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martha Bonilla-Moheno & Eduardo García-Frapolli, 2012. "Conservation in Context: A Comparison of Conservation Perspectives in a Mexican Protected Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Mertz, Ole & Mertens, Charlotte Filt, 2017. "Land Sparing and Land Sharing Policies in Developing Countries – Drivers and Linkages to Scientific Debates," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 523-535.
    3. Kovács, Eszter & Kelemen, Eszter & Kalóczkai, Ágnes & Margóczi, Katalin & Pataki, György & Gébert, Judit & Málovics, György & Balázs, Bálint & Roboz, Ágnes & Krasznai Kovács, Eszter & Mihók, Barbara, 2015. "Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 117-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Jing & Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Ning, Shanshan & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2024. "The decoupling relationship between land use efficiency and carbon emissions in China: An analysis using the Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernués, Alberto & Alfnes, Frode & Clemetsen, Morten & Eik, Lars Olav & Faccioni, Georgia & Ramanzin, Maurizio & Ripoll-Bosch, Raimon & Rodríguez-Ortega, Tamara & Sturaro, Enrico, 2019. "Exploring social preferences for ecosystem services of multifunctional agriculture across policy scenarios," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. Ramel, Cindy & Rey, Pierre-Louis & Fernandes, Rui & Vincent, Claire & Cardoso, Ana R. & Broennimann, Olivier & Pellissier, Loïc & Pradervand, Jean-Nicolas & Ursenbacher, Sylvain & Schmidt, Benedikt R., 2020. "Integrating ecosystem services within spatial biodiversity conservation prioritization in the Alps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    3. María Fernanda López Sandoval & Andrés Gerique & Perdita Pohle, 2017. "What Is Behind Land Claims? Downsizing of a Conservation Area in Southeastern Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Pinke, Zsolt & Kiss, Márton & Lövei, Gábor L., 2018. "Developing an integrated land use planning system on reclaimed wetlands of the Hungarian Plain using economic valuation of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 299-308.
    5. Haojie Liu & Jinyue Liu & Weixin Yang & Jianing Chen & Mingyang Zhu, 2020. "Analysis and Prediction of Land Use in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: A Study Based on the Improved Convolutional Neural Network Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Feurer, Melanie & Rueff, Henri & Celio, Enrico & Heinimann, Andreas & Blaser, Juergen & Htun, Aung Myin & Zaehringer, Julie Gwendolin, 2021. "Regional scale mapping of ecosystem services supply, demand, flow and mismatches in Southern Myanmar," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Wang, Jing & Lin, Yifan & Glendinning, Anthony & Xu, Yueqing, 2018. "Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 375-387.
    8. Capmourteres, Virginia & Adams, Justin & Berg, Aaron & Fraser, Evan & Swanton, Clarence & Anand, Madhur, 2018. "Precision conservation meets precision agriculture: A case study from southern Ontario," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 176-185.
    9. Dongliang Dang & Xiaobing Li & Shengkun Li & Huashun Dou, 2018. "Ecosystem Services and Their Relationships in the Grain-for-Green Programme—A Case Study of Duolun County in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Xiuju Feng & Jian Gao & Jittaporn Sriboonjit & Zhongmin Wang & Jianxu Liu & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2023. "The Impact of Urbanization on Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Wells, Geoff J. & Stuart, Neil & Furley, Peter A. & Ryan, Casey M., 2018. "Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands: A case study in Belize," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 70-77.
    12. Dick, Jan & Turkelboom, Francis & Woods, Helen & Iniesta-Arandia, Irene & Primmer, Eeva & Saarela, Sanna-Riikka & Bezák, Peter & Mederly, Peter & Leone, Michael & Verheyden, Wim & Kelemen, Eszter & Ha, 2018. "Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 552-565.
    13. Cuni-Sanchez, Aida & Ngute, Alain Senghor K. & Sonké, Bonaventure & Sainge, Moses Nsanyi & Burgess, Neil D. & Klein, Julia A. & Marchant, Rob, 2019. "The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    14. D. Rodríguez-Rodríguez & P. Ibarra & M. Echeverría & J. Martínez-Vega, 2019. "Perceptions, attitudes and values of two key stakeholders on the oldest and newest Spanish national parks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1053-1073, April.
    15. Turkelboom, Francis & Leone, Michael & Jacobs, Sander & Kelemen, Eszter & García-Llorente, Marina & Baró, Francesc & Termansen, Mette & Barton, David N. & Berry, Pam & Stange, Erik & Thoonen, Marijke , 2018. "When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 566-578.
    16. Ishfaq Ahmad Sheergojri & Irfan Rashid & Ishfaq ul Rehman, 2024. "Systematic review of wetland ecosystem services valuation in India: assessing economic approaches, knowledge gaps, and management implications," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 167-179, March.
    17. Verónica Iñiguez-Gallardo & Fabián Reyes-Bueno & Olga Peñaranda, 2021. "Conservation Debates: People’s Perceptions and Values towards a Privately Protected Area in Southern Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Luciana Iocca & Teresa Fidélis, 2023. "Is There a Place for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Climate Change Policy and Governance? Learnings from a Brazilian Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Kim, Ilkwon & Lee, Jae-hyuck & Kwon, Hyuksoo, 2021. "Participatory ecosystem service assessment to enhance environmental decision-making in a border city of South Korea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    20. Notaro, Martin & Gary, Christian & Le Coq, Jean-François & Metay, Aurélie & Rapidel, Bruno, 2022. "How to increase the joint provision of ecosystem services by agricultural systems. Evidence from coffee-based agroforestry systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1147-:d:666629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.