IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1109-d660545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Aspect and Elevational Gradient on Vegetation Pattern, Tree Characteristics and Ecosystem Carbon Density in Northwestern Himalayas

Author

Listed:
  • D. R. Bhardwaj

    (Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Dr. YSP University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan 173230, India)

  • Habibullah Tahiry

    (Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Dr. YSP University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan 173230, India
    Climate Change Division, National Environmental Protection Agency, Government of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Kabul 209, Afghanistan)

  • Prashant Sharma

    (Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Dr. YSP University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan 173230, India)

  • Nazir A. Pala

    (Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Faculty of Forestry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu (SKUAST), Jammu 191201, India
    Contributed equally.)

  • Dhirender Kumar

    (Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Dr. YSP University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan 173230, India)

  • Amit Kumar

    (School of Hydrology and Water Resources, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    Contributed equally.)

  • Bharti

    (Division of Sample Survey, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

Abstract

Himalayan forest has been threatened by rapid anthropogenic activities, resulting in the loss of forest diversity and climate change. The present study was carried out on four aspects (northern, southern, western and eastern), at three different altitudinal ranges, namely, 1000–1300 m above sea level (m a.s.l.), 1300–1600 m a.s.l. and 1600–1900 m a.s.l., and at three diverse mountain ranges (Kalaghat, Barog and Nangali) of sub-temperate forest ecosystems of the mid Himalayan ranges, to elucidate their influence on vegetation, tree characteristics and ecosystem carbon density. The results revealed that Pinus roxburghii is the most dominant forest community of the mid Himalaya’s forest, irrespective of altitudinal gradient and slope. The south-facing slopes are occupied by the xerophytic tree species frequently found in the lower Shiwalik P. roxburghii forest, whereas the north-facing ones are dominated by mesophyllic species, such as Cedrus deodara and Quercus leucotrichophora, which commonly grows in the northwestern Himalayan temperate forest ecosystem. The maximum stem density (211.00 Nha −1 ) was found at 1000–1300 m a.s.l., and on the northern aspect (211.00 Nha −1 ). The maximum stem volume (236.50 m 3 ha −1 ) was observed on the northern aspect at 1000–1300 m a.s.l., whereas the minimum (32.167 m 3 ha −1 ) in the southern aspect at 1300–1600 m a.s.l. The maximum carbon density (149.90 Mg ha −1 ) was found on the northern aspect and declined with increasing elevation from 123.20 to 74.78 Mg ha −1 . Overall, the study establishes that the southern and western aspects are very low in carbon density, whereas the northern aspect represents higher biodiversity as well as carbon and nutrient stocks. Therefore, aspect and altitude should be given due importance for efficient managing of biodiversity and mitigating climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • D. R. Bhardwaj & Habibullah Tahiry & Prashant Sharma & Nazir A. Pala & Dhirender Kumar & Amit Kumar & Bharti, 2021. "Influence of Aspect and Elevational Gradient on Vegetation Pattern, Tree Characteristics and Ecosystem Carbon Density in Northwestern Himalayas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1109-:d:660545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. Stuart Chapin III & Erika S. Zavaleta & Valerie T. Eviner & Rosamond L. Naylor & Peter M. Vitousek & Heather L. Reynolds & David U. Hooper & Sandra Lavorel & Osvaldo E. Sala & Sarah E. Hobbie & Mic, 2000. "Consequences of changing biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6783), pages 234-242, May.
    2. D. Nogués-Bravo & M. B. Araújo & T. Romdal & C. Rahbek, 2008. "Scale effects and human impact on the elevational species richness gradients," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7192), pages 216-219, May.
    3. Steven McNulty & Emrys Treasure & Lisa Jennings & David Meriwether & David Harris & Paul Arndt, 2018. "Translating national level forest service goals to local level land management: carbon sequestration," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 133-144, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jansson, Åsa, 2013. "Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 285-291.
    2. Ariane Amin & Johanna Choumert, 2015. "Development and biodiversity conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A spatial analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 729-744.
    3. Pistorius, Till & Schaich, Harald & Winkel, Georg & Plieninger, Tobias & Bieling, Claudia & Konold, Werner & Volz, Karl-Reinhard, 2012. "Lessons for REDDplus: A comparative analysis of the German discourse on forest functions and the global ecosystem services debate," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 4-12.
    4. Markus Groth, 2009. "The transferability and performance of payment-by-results biodiversity conservation procurement auctions: empirical evidence from northernmost Germany," Working Paper Series in Economics 119, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    5. Mußhoff, O. & Hirschauer, N., 2013. "Planspiele als experimentelle Methode der Politikfolgenabschätzung: Das Beispiel der Stickstoffextensivierung," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 48, March.
    6. Pritchard, Rose & Ryan, Casey M. & Grundy, Isla & van der Horst, Dan, 2018. "Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity and Rural Livelihoods: Findings From Six Villages in Zimbabwe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 115-124.
    7. Eduardo Carneiro & Olaf Hermann Hendrik Mielke & Mirna Martins Casagrande & Konrad Fiedler, 2014. "Community Structure of Skipper Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae) along Elevational Gradients in Brazilian Atlantic Forest Reflects Vegetation Type Rather than Altitude," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.
    8. Wojciech Bierza & Joanna Czarnecka & Agnieszka Błońska & Agnieszka Kompała-Bąba & Agnieszka Hutniczak & Bartosz Jendrzejek & Jawdat Bakr & Andrzej M. Jagodziński & Dariusz Prostański & Gabriela Woźnia, 2023. "Plant Diversity and Species Composition in Relation to Soil Enzymatic Activity in the Novel Ecosystems of Urban–Industrial Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Han-Shen Chen & Wan-Yu Liu & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2017. "Integrating Ecosystem Services and Eco-Security to Assess Sustainable Development in Liuqiu Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    10. Arnold J. Bomans & Peter Roessingh, 2024. "Decision Change: The First Step to System Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Lee, Joung Hun & Iwasa, Yoh, 2012. "Optimal investment for enhancing social concern about biodiversity conservation: A dynamic approach," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 177-186.
    12. Deepa Moni Doley & Paramananda Barman, 2023. "Importance of communicating biodiversity for sustainable wildlife management: a review," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 321-329, June.
    13. repec:plo:pone00:0118851 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Oliver Froer, 2003. "Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis," Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim 217/2003, Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Germany.
    15. Zhongwei Guo & Lin Zhang & Yiming Li, 2010. "Increased Dependence of Humans on Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-8, October.
    16. Courage Kamusoko & Yukio Wada & Toru Furuya & Shunsuke Tomimura & Mitsuru Nasu & Khamma Homsysavath, 2013. "Simulating Future Forest Cover Changes in Pakxeng District, Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR): Implications for Sustainable Forest Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0023744 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Rees, Siân E. & Fletcher, Stephen & Gall, Sarah C. & Friedrich, Laura A. & Jackson, Emma L. & Rodwell, Lynda D., 2014. "Securing the benefits: Linking ecology with marine planning policy to examine the potential of a network of Marine Protected Areas to support human wellbeing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 335-341.
    20. Manoj Kaushal & Mary Atieno & Sylvanus Odjo & Frederick Baijukya & Yosef Gebrehawaryat & Carlo Fadda, 2025. "Nature-Positive Agriculture—A Way Forward Towards Resilient Agrifood Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, January.
    21. Fletcher, Ruth & Baulcomb, Corinne & Hall, Clare & Hussain, Salman, 2014. "Revealing marine cultural ecosystem services in the Black Sea," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 151-161.
    22. Antonino Malacrinò & Victoria A Sadowski & Tvisha K Martin & Nathalia Cavichiolli de Oliveira & Ian J Brackett & James D Feller & Kristian J Harris & Orlando Combita Heredia & Rosa Vescio & Alison E B, 2020. "Biological invasions alter environmental microbiomes: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1109-:d:660545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.