IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i8p414-d1710851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Re-Examination of the “Informational” Role of Non-GAAP Earnings in the Post-Reg G Period

Author

Listed:
  • Xuan Song

    (School of Business, Belhaven University, Jackson, MS 39202, USA)

  • Huan Qiu

    (Else School of Management, Millsaps College, Jackson, MS 39210, USA
    Department of Finance, College of Business and Economics, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA)

  • Ying Lin

    (School of Business, Belhaven University, Jackson, MS 39202, USA)

  • Michael S. Luehlfing

    (School of Accountancy, College of Business, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA)

  • Marcelo Eduardo

    (School of Business, Mississippi College, Clinton, MS 39058, USA)

Abstract

In this study, we utilize a unique quarterly dataset of non-GAAP earnings to re-examine the “informational” role of non-GAAP earnings from the perspective of value relevance and earnings predictability in the post-Reg G period. We find that non-GAAP earnings are more value relevant and can better predict future operating earnings of a firm compared to equivalent GAAP earnings. Additionally, we also find empirical evidence suggesting that the difference in the value relevance and earnings predictability between non-GAAP and equivalent GAAP earnings can vary across but cannot be completely mitigated by firm-level characteristics, such as the market value of equity, accruals quality, analyst coverage, and managerial ability of a firm. Moreover, our supplementary analysis reveals that the superior value relevance and predictive power of non-GAAP earnings persist even after the SEC’s release of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DI) in 2010. Overall, our empirical evidence suggests a superior “informational” role of non-GAAP earnings to equivalent GAAP earnings in terms of valuation and predictability on future operating performance in the post-Reg G period.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuan Song & Huan Qiu & Ying Lin & Michael S. Luehlfing & Marcelo Eduardo, 2025. "A Re-Examination of the “Informational” Role of Non-GAAP Earnings in the Post-Reg G Period," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:414-:d:1710851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/8/414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/8/414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:8:p:414-:d:1710851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.