IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i6p827-d1663303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State Preemption and Local Tobacco Control: Constraints and Opportunities for Innovation in the US

Author

Listed:
  • Rishika Chakraborty

    (Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement, School of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Micah L. Berman

    (College of Public Health & Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Y. Tony Yang

    (Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement, School of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
    George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Yan Li

    (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
    Joint Program for Survey Methodology, School of Behavioral and Social Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Yan Wang

    (George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
    Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Debra Bernat

    (George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
    Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Sabrina Zhang

    (Joint Program for Survey Methodology, School of Behavioral and Social Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Carla J. Berg

    (George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
    Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

Abstract

State preemption of local laws may impede tobacco control, yet little research has examined local policy activity before, during, and after preemption. This study addresses this gap. We summarized state laws preempting local smoke-free workplace, youth access, and licensure laws (CDC’s STATE) and local legislative activity before, during, and after preemption (Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation) across 1999–2021. Preemption existed for smoke-free workplaces in 18 states, youth access in 21, and licensure in 13. Regarding smoke-free workplace laws, local laws were passed in 5 of 11 states with preemption throughout; among seven states with partial-period preemption, local laws were enacted before preemption or after repeal in three states but during preemption in two. Regarding youth access, localities adopted laws (e.g., addressing purchase/use/possession or e-cigarettes) in 11 of 18 states with preemption throughout; among the three states with partial-period preemption, localities passed laws before preemption in one state and during preemption in two. For licensure, localities passed laws (e.g., licensing requirements/penalties) in eight of nine states with preemption throughout and three of four states with partial-period preemption. Although state preemption reduced local activity, some localities advanced tobacco control during preemption, underscoring the need for localities to exercise autonomy permitted under preemption.

Suggested Citation

  • Rishika Chakraborty & Micah L. Berman & Y. Tony Yang & Yan Li & Yan Wang & Debra Bernat & Sabrina Zhang & Carla J. Berg, 2025. "State Preemption and Local Tobacco Control: Constraints and Opportunities for Innovation in the US," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:827-:d:1663303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/827/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/827/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:827-:d:1663303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.