IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i11p6016-d1160658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preemption in State Tobacco Minimum Legal Sales Age Laws in the US, 2022: A Policy Analysis of State Statutes and Case Laws

Author

Listed:
  • Page D. Dobbs

    (Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, 308A HPER Building, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Ginny Chadwick

    (Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA)

  • Eric Crosbie

    (School of Public Health, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA)

  • Jessica Breslin

    (ChangeLab Solutions, Oakland, CA 94612, USA)

  • Lisa Henriksen

    (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA)

Abstract

Preemptive statutory language within tobacco minimum legal sales age (MLSA) laws has prohibited localities from enacting stricter laws than state statutes. With the recent uptake of state Tobacco 21 laws in the US, the current landscape of preempted MLSA laws is unknown. This study sought to update the status of preemption in MLSA laws enacted in US states between 2015–2022. A public health attorney reviewed state tobacco MLSA laws ( n = 50) and state tobacco control codes, searching for language regarding preemption. When statutes were unclear, case law was reviewed by examining local ordinances that were invalidated by state court decisions. Overall, 40 states enacted Tobacco 21 laws, seven of which expanded or introduced preemption when they increased the MLSA; a total of 26 states (52%) included preemption. Six states (12%) retained ‘savings clauses’ included in the MLSA prior to Tobacco 21, and 18 states (36%) did not mention preemption. Based on the precedent set by state courts, eight of these 18 states may preempt localities from raising their MLSA. Historically, preemption has slowed the diffusion of best practices in tobacco control, and once implemented, the laws are difficult to repeal. The recent expansion of preemption could inhibit the evolution, development, and implementation of effective tobacco control policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Page D. Dobbs & Ginny Chadwick & Eric Crosbie & Jessica Breslin & Lisa Henriksen, 2023. "Preemption in State Tobacco Minimum Legal Sales Age Laws in the US, 2022: A Policy Analysis of State Statutes and Case Laws," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:6016-:d:1160658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/6016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:6016-:d:1160658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.