IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2580-d1053214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anode Modification with Fe 2 O 3 Affects the Anode Microbiome and Improves Energy Generation in Microbial Fuel Cells Powered by Wastewater

Author

Listed:
  • Dawid Nosek

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Słoneczna 45 G, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Tomasz Mikołajczyk

    (Department of Chemistry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, plac Łódzki 4, 10-721 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska

    (Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Słoneczna 45 G, 10-709 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

This study investigated how anode electrode modification with iron affects the microbiome and electricity generation of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fed with municipal wastewater. Doses of 0.0 (control), 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 g Fe 2 O 3 per the total anode electrode area were tested. Fe 2 O 3 doses from 0.05 to 0.2 g improved electricity generation; with a dose of 0.10 g Fe 2 O 3 , the cell power was highest (1.39 mW/m 2 ), and the internal resistance was lowest (184.9 Ω). Although acetate was the main source of organics in the municipal wastewater, propionic and valeric acids predominated in the outflows from all MFCs. In addition, Fe-modification stimulated the growth of the extracellular polymer producers Zoogloea sp. and Acidovorax sp., which favored biofilm formation. Electrogenic Geobacter sp. had the highest percent abundance in the anode of the control MFC, which generated the least electricity. However, with 0.05 and 0.10 g Fe 2 O 3 doses, Pseudomonas sp., Oscillochloris sp., and Rhizobium sp. predominated in the anode microbiomes, and with 0.2 and 0.4 g doses, the electrogens Dechloromonas sp. and Desulfobacter sp. predominated. This is the first study to holistically examine how different amounts of Fe on the anode affect electricity generation, the microbiome, and metabolic products in the outflow of MFCs fed with synthetic municipal wastewater.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawid Nosek & Tomasz Mikołajczyk & Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, 2023. "Anode Modification with Fe 2 O 3 Affects the Anode Microbiome and Improves Energy Generation in Microbial Fuel Cells Powered by Wastewater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2580-:d:1053214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawid Nosek & Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, 2020. "Microbial Structure and Energy Generation in Microbial Fuel Cells Powered with Waste Anaerobic Digestate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Liping Fan & Yaobin Xi, 2021. "Effect of Polypyrrole-Fe 3 O 4 Composite Modified Anode and Its Electrodeposition Time on the Performance of Microbial Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Alatraktchi, Fatima AlZahra’a & Zhang, Yifeng & Angelidaki, Irini, 2014. "Nanomodification of the electrodes in microbial fuel cell: Impact of nanoparticle density on electricity production and microbial community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 216-222.
    4. Dawid Nosek & Piotr Jachimowicz & Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, 2020. "Anode Modification as an Alternative Approach to Improve Electricity Generation in Microbial Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Paul J McMurdie & Susan Holmes, 2014. "Waste Not, Want Not: Why Rarefying Microbiome Data Is Inadmissible," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Enas Taha Sayed & Hussain Alawadhi & Khaled Elsaid & A. G. Olabi & Maryam Adel Almakrani & Shaikha Tamim Bin Tamim & Ghada H. M. Alafranji & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2020. "A Carbon-Cloth Anode Electroplated with Iron Nanostructure for Microbial Fuel Cell Operated with Real Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Schilirò, T. & Tommasi, T. & Armato, C. & Hidalgo, D. & Traversi, D. & Bocchini, S. & Gilli, G. & Pirri, C.F., 2016. "The study of electrochemically active planktonic microbes in microbial fuel cells in relation to different carbon-based anode materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 277-284.
    8. Sekar, Aiswarya Devi & Jayabalan, Tamilmani & Muthukumar, Harshiny & Chandrasekaran, Nivedhini Iswarya & Mohamed, Samsudeen Naina & Matheswaran, Manickam, 2019. "Enhancing power generation and treatment of dairy waste water in microbial fuel cell using Cu-doped iron oxide nanoparticles decorated anode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 173-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dawid Nosek & Piotr Jachimowicz & Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, 2020. "Anode Modification as an Alternative Approach to Improve Electricity Generation in Microbial Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Sekar, Aiswarya Devi & Jayabalan, Tamilmani & Muthukumar, Harshiny & Chandrasekaran, Nivedhini Iswarya & Mohamed, Samsudeen Naina & Matheswaran, Manickam, 2019. "Enhancing power generation and treatment of dairy waste water in microbial fuel cell using Cu-doped iron oxide nanoparticles decorated anode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 173-180.
    3. Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska & Dawid Nosek, 2022. "Advances in Microbial Fuel Cell Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-3, August.
    4. Aaron C Ericsson & J Wade Davis & William Spollen & Nathan Bivens & Scott Givan & Catherine E Hagan & Mark McIntosh & Craig L Franklin, 2015. "Effects of Vendor and Genetic Background on the Composition of the Fecal Microbiota of Inbred Mice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Duo Jiang & Thomas Sharpton & Yuan Jiang, 2021. "Microbial Interaction Network Estimation via Bias-Corrected Graphical Lasso," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 13(2), pages 329-350, July.
    6. Shilan Li & Jianxin Shi & Paul Albert & Hong-Bin Fang, 2022. "Dependence Structure Analysis and Its Application in Human Microbiome," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. M. McCauley & T. L. Goulet & C. R. Jackson & S. Loesgen, 2023. "Systematic review of cnidarian microbiomes reveals insights into the structure, specificity, and fidelity of marine associations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Nassef, Ahmed M. & Olabi, A.G. & Rodriguez, Cristina & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Rezk, Hegazy, 2021. "Optimal operating parameter determination and modeling to enhance methane production from macroalgae," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 2190-2197.
    9. Anna C. Peterson & Himanshu Sharma & Arvind Kumar & Bruno M. Ghersi & Scott J. Emrich & Kurt J. Vandegrift & Amit Kapoor & Michael J. Blum, 2021. "Rodent Virus Diversity and Differentiation across Post-Katrina New Orleans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Francesco Spennati & Salvatore La China & Giovanna Siracusa & Simona Di Gregorio & Alessandra Bardi & Valeria Tigini & Gualtiero Mori & David Gabriel & Giulio Munz, 2021. "Tannery Wastewater Recalcitrant Compounds Foster the Selection of Fungi in Non-Sterile Conditions: A Pilot Scale Long-Term Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Anusha Ganta & Yasser Bashir & Sovik Das, 2022. "Dairy Wastewater as a Potential Feedstock for Valuable Production with Concurrent Wastewater Treatment through Microbial Electrochemical Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-34, November.
    12. Cai, Weiwei & Zhang, Zhaojing & Ren, Ge & Shen, Qiuxuan & Hou, Yanan & Ma, Anzhou & Deng, Ye & Wang, Aijie & Liu, Wenzong, 2016. "Quorum sensing alters the microbial community of electrode-respiring bacteria and hydrogen scavengers toward improving hydrogen yield in microbial electrolysis cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1133-1141.
    13. Abdul Ghani Olabi & Tabbi Wilberforce & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Mohamad Ramadan, 2021. "Critical Review of Flywheel Energy Storage System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-33, April.
    14. Xu, Lei & Wang, Bodi & Liu, Xiuhua & Yu, Wenzheng & Zhao, Yaqian, 2018. "Maximizing the energy harvest from a microbial fuel cell embedded in a constructed wetland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 83-91.
    15. Halima Alnaqbi & Oussama El-Kadri & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Sameer Al-Asheh, 2022. "Recent Progress in Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Chalcogenides (MX; X = S, Se) as Electrode Materials for Supercapacitors and Catalysts in Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, November.
    16. Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar & Godvin Sharmila Vincent, 2022. "Recent Advances and Perspectives of Nanotechnology in Anaerobic Digestion: A New Paradigm towards Sludge Biodegradability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Wilberforce, Tabbi & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Elsaid, Khaled & Olabi, A.G. & Sayed, Enas Taha, 2022. "Role of carbon-based nanomaterials in improving the performance of microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    18. Liping Fan & Yaobin Xi, 2021. "Effect of Polypyrrole-Fe 3 O 4 Composite Modified Anode and Its Electrodeposition Time on the Performance of Microbial Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    19. Shahid, Kanwal & Ramasamy, Deepika Lakshmi & Haapasaari, Sampo & Sillanpää, Mika & Pihlajamäki, Arto, 2021. "Stainless steel and carbon brushes as high-performance anodes for energy production and nutrient recovery using the microbial nutrient recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    20. Chen, Wenwen & Liu, Zhongliang & Li, Yanxia & Liao, Qiang & Zhu, Xun, 2021. "High electricity generation achieved by depositing rGO@MnO2 composite catalysts on three-dimensional stainless steel fiber felt for preparing the energy-efficient air cathode in microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2580-:d:1053214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.