IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i19p6838-d1248581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrary Perceptions of Environmental Health and the Governance of the Bucaramanga Metropolitan Area, Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Rojas

    (Public Health Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander 680002, Colombia)

  • Douglas Molina-Orjuela

    (GRIALI Research Group, Faculty of Political Sciences and International Relations, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Laura Peña-Rodríguez

    (School of Social Work, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander 680002, Colombia)

  • Andrea Hernández-Quirama

    (School of Social Work, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander 680002, Colombia)

  • Mauricio Rojas-Betancur

    (School of Social Work, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander 680002, Colombia)

  • Claudia Amaya-Castellanos

    (Public Health Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander 680002, Colombia)

  • Laura A. Rodríguez-Villamizar

    (Public Health Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander 680002, Colombia)

  • Alvaro J. Idrovo

    (Public Health Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Santander 680002, Colombia)

Abstract

The participation of civil society is essential for environmental health policies to be accepted. The objective of this study was to know the perceptions of government officials, members of civil society, and academics about environmental health problems and its governance in the Bucaramanga Metropolitan Area, Colombia. In the region, there is a strong citizens movement that defends the moorland ecosystem (páramo) as a source of drinking water for large-scale mining projects. A multi-method study was conducted, including the review of newspaper and scientific articles, a citizens survey, and interviews and focus groups with identified key stakeholders. The findings indicate that government officials prioritize their actions on issues related to air and water pollution and environmental education. In contrast, citizens prioritize water availability from the moorland ecosystem. There are some advances in the management of environmental health, mainly related to greater citizen awareness. Contrary perceptions among government officials, academics, and civil society prevent adequate prioritization of environmental health problems. Participation of civil society is absent in activities related to environmental governance. An ongoing citizens science experience engaging high school students and the academy can be the first meeting point with government officials in the pathway to improve the environmental governance in the territory. The participation of civil society in the environmental health governance must be enforced to broaden the issues of interest and prioritize the activities in short- and long-term policy planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Rojas & Douglas Molina-Orjuela & Laura Peña-Rodríguez & Andrea Hernández-Quirama & Mauricio Rojas-Betancur & Claudia Amaya-Castellanos & Laura A. Rodríguez-Villamizar & Alvaro J. Idrovo, 2023. "Contrary Perceptions of Environmental Health and the Governance of the Bucaramanga Metropolitan Area, Colombia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:19:p:6838-:d:1248581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/19/6838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/19/6838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiwei Wang & Qiang Liu & Bo Hou, 2022. "How Does Government Information Service Quality Influence Public Environmental Awareness?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Lenihan, Helena & McGuirk, Helen & Murphy, Kevin R., 2019. "Driving innovation: Public policy and human capital," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    3. Gabriele Bolte & Katharina Jacke & Katrin Groth & Ute Kraus & Lisa Dandolo & Lotta Fiedel & Malgorzata Debiak & Marike Kolossa-Gehring & Alexandra Schneider & Kerstin Palm, 2021. "Integrating Sex/Gender into Environmental Health Research: Development of a Conceptual Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10014:y:2020:i:1:p:471-482 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Maciej Jagódka & Małgorzata Snarska, 2021. "The State of Human Capital and Innovativeness of Polish Voivodships in 2004–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    4. Hana Urbancová & Pavla Vrabcová, 2023. "Sustainability-oriented Innovation: Crucial Sources to Achieve Competitiveness," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 46-64, January.
    5. Mathushan P & Kengatharan N, 2022. "Human Resource Management Practices And Firm Innovation: Mediating Role Of Human Capital," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 25-36, June.
    6. Lisa Dandolo & Christina Hartig & Klaus Telkmann & Sophie Horstmann & Lars Schwettmann & Peter Selsam & Alexandra Schneider & Gabriele Bolte & on behalf of the INGER Study Group, 2022. "Decision Tree Analyses to Explore the Relevance of Multiple Sex/Gender Dimensions for the Exposure to Green Spaces: Results from the KORA INGER Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Lisa Dandolo & Klaus Telkmann & Christina Hartig & Sophie Horstmann & Sara Pedron & Lars Schwettmann & Peter Selsam & Alexandra Schneider & Gabriele Bolte & on behalf of the INGER Study Group, 2023. "Do Multiple Sex/Gender Dimensions Play a Role in the Association of Green Space and Self-Rated Health? Model-Based Recursive Partitioning Results from the KORA INGER Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Mulligan, Kevin & Lenihan, Helena & Doran, Justin & Roper, Stephen, 2022. "Harnessing the science base: Results from a national programme using publicly-funded research centres to reshape firms’ R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    9. Caloghirou, Yannis & Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Korra, Efthymia & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2021. "Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation: How do knowledge stocks and crisis matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    10. Samuel Kwesi Dunyo & Samuel Amponsah Odei, 2023. "Firm-Level Innovations in an Emerging Economy: Do Perceived Policy Instability and Legal Institutional Conditions Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Fernando Almeida & José Morais & José Duarte Santos, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Outcomes of European Projects on the Digital Transformation of SMEs," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Yusen Luo & Qinglin Wang & Xingle Long & Zheming Yan & Muhammad Salman & Chao Wu, 2023. "Green innovation and SO2 emissions: Dynamic threshold effect of human capital," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 499-515, January.
    13. Jing A. Zhang & Tao Bai & Ryan W. Tang & Fiona Edgar & Steven Grover & Guoquan Chen, 2022. "The Development of Individual Ambidexterity Across Institutional Environments: Symmetric and Configurational Analyses," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 517-540, August.
    14. Aleksandra Kuzior & Olena Arefieva & Alona Kovalchuk & Paulina Brożek & Volodymyr Tytykalo, 2022. "Strategic Guidelines for the Intellectualization of Human Capital in the Context of Innovative Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Franco, Chiara & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Organizational drivers of innovation: The role of workforce agility," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    16. Anastasia Rogova & Isabel Martinez Leal & Maggie Britton & Shine Chang & Kamisha H. Escoto & Kayce D. Solari Williams & Crystal Roberson & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Promoting Cancer Health Equity: A Qualitative Study of Mentee and Mentor Perspectives of a Training Program for Underrepresented Scholars in Cancer Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Sophie Ch. Fichter & Katrin Groth & Nina Fiedler & Marike Kolossa-Gehring & Małgorzata Dębiak & on behalf of the INGER Study Group, 2022. "Lysmeral Exposure in Children and Adolescences Participating in the German Environmental Survey (2012–2015): Integrating Sex/Gender into Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Silje Haus-Reve & Rune Dahl Fitjar & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2023. "DUI it yourself: Innovation and activities to promote learning by doing, using, and interacting within the firm," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 1008-1028, September.
    19. Zijin Wang & Jitao Guo & Gengyan Luo, 2022. "The Impact of Chinese Carbon Emissions Trading System on Efficiency of Enterprise Capital Allocation: Effect Identification and Mechanism Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Jasmina Misheva, 2023. "Importance of non-cognitive factors for human capital development and innovation," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 89-112.
    21. Shaopeng Zhang & Xiaohong Wang, 2022. "Effects of Local Government Behavior on University–Enterprise Knowledge Flow: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:19:p:6838-:d:1248581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.