IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p362-d1015400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Use of Digital Mental Health Platforms and Interventions: Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Balcombe

    (Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Messines Ridge Road, Mount Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia)

  • Diego De Leo

    (Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Messines Ridge Road, Mount Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia)

Abstract

Background: The increasing use of digital mental health (DMH) platforms and digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) is hindered by uncertainty over effectiveness, quality and usability. There is a need to identify the types of available evidence in this domain. Aim: This study is a scoping review identifying evaluation of the (1) DMH platform/s used; and (2) DMHI/s applied on the DMH platform/s. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guided the review process. Empirical studies that focused on evaluation of the use and application of DMH platforms were included from journal articles (published 2012–2022). A literature search was conducted using four electronic databases (Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage and ACM Digital Library) and two search engines (PubMed and Google Scholar). Results: A total of 6874 nonduplicate records were identified, of which 144 were analyzed and 22 met the inclusion criteria. The review included general/unspecified mental health and/or suicidality indications ( n = 9, 40.9%), followed by depression ( n = 5, 22.7%), psychosis ( n = 3, 13.6%), anxiety and depression ( n = 2, 9.1%), as well as anxiety, depression and suicidality ( n = 1, 4.5%), loneliness ( n = 1, 4.5%), and addiction ( n = 1, 4.5%). There were 11 qualitative studies (50%), 8 quantitative studies (36.4%), and 3 mixed-methods studies ( n = 3, 13.6%). The results contained 11 studies that evaluated the DMH platform/s and 11 studies that evaluated the DMHI/s. The studies focused on feasibility, usability, engagement, acceptability and effectiveness. There was a small amount of significant evidence (1 in each 11), notably the (cost-)effectiveness of a DMHI with significant long-term impact on anxiety and depression in adults. Conclusion: The empirical research demonstrates the feasibility of DMH platforms and DMHIs. To date, there is mostly heterogeneous, preliminary evidence for their effectiveness, quality and usability. However, a scalable DMHI reported effectiveness in treating adults’ anxiety and depression. The scope of effectiveness may be widened through targeted strategies, for example by engaging independent young people.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke Balcombe & Diego De Leo, 2022. "Evaluation of the Use of Digital Mental Health Platforms and Interventions: Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:362-:d:1015400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/362/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelley L. Craig & Vivian W. Y. Leung & Rachael Pascoe & Nelson Pang & Gio Iacono & Ashley Austin & Frank Dillon, 2021. "AFFIRM Online: Utilising an Affirmative Cognitive–Behavioural Digital Intervention to Improve Mental Health, Access, and Engagement among LGBTQA+ Youth and Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Silke Bachmann, 2018. "Epidemiology of Suicide and the Psychiatric Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ching Kwan & Clifford Wong & Zhansheng Chen & Paul S. F. Yip, 2022. "Youth Bullying and Suicide: Risk and Protective Factor Profiles for Bullies, Victims, Bully-Victims and the Uninvolved," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Marcos Vinicius de Carvalho Mendes & Solange Laurentino dos Santos & Claudia Cristina Lima de Castro & Betise Mery Alencar Sousa Macau Furtado & Heitor Victor Veiga da Costa & Albanita Gomes da Costa , 2021. "Analysis of Factors Associated with the Risk of Suicide in a Brazilian Capital: Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Dorota Lasota & Dagmara Mirowska-Guzel & Krzysztof Goniewicz, 2021. "Analysis of Suicide Methods and Substances Influencing the State of Consciousness of Their Victims in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Ascensión Fumero & Rosario J. Marrero & Alicia Pérez-Albéniz & Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, 2021. "Adolescents’ Bipolar Experiences and Suicide Risk: Well-being and Mental Health Difficulties as Mediators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Irene Pisnoli & Ruth Van der Hallen, 2022. "Attitudes toward Suicide and the Impact of Client Suicide: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    6. Louise Brådvik, 2018. "Suicide Risk and Mental Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-4, September.
    7. Carl B. Roth & Andreas Papassotiropoulos & Annette B. Brühl & Undine E. Lang & Christian G. Huber, 2021. "Psychiatry in the Digital Age: A Blessing or a Curse?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Malosree Maitra & Haruka Mitsuhashi & Reza Rahimian & Anjali Chawla & Jennie Yang & Laura M. Fiori & Maria Antonietta Davoli & Kelly Perlman & Zahia Aouabed & Deborah C. Mash & Matthew Suderman & Nagu, 2023. "Cell type specific transcriptomic differences in depression show similar patterns between males and females but implicate distinct cell types and genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Anaïs Le Jeannic & Kathleen Turmaine & Coralie Gandré & Marie-Amélie Vinet & Morgane Michel & Karine Chevreul & on behalf of the PRINTEMPS Consortium, 2023. "Defining the Characteristics of an e-Health Tool for Suicide Primary Prevention in the General Population: The StopBlues Case in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Tore Bonsaksen & Laila Skogstad & Trond Heir & Øivind Ekeberg & Inger Schou-Bredal & Tine K. Grimholt, 2021. "Suicide Thoughts and Attempts in the Norwegian General Population during the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-9, April.
    11. Kevin P. Conway & Patrick McGrain & Michelle Theodory, 2023. "Fell on Black Days: Analyzing the Song Lyrics of Chris Cornell for Insight into Depression and Suicide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Reinhold Kilian & Annabel Müller-Stierlin & Felicitas Söhner & Petra Beschoner & Harald Gündel & Tobias Staiger & Maja Stiawa & Thomas Becker & Karel Frasch & Maria Panzirsch & Max Schmauß & Silvia Kr, 2020. "Masculinity norms and occupational role orientations in men treated for depression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Silje L. Kaspersen & Jorid Kalseth & Kim Stene-Larsen & Anne Reneflot, 2022. "Use of Health Services and Support Resources by Immediate Family Members Bereaved by Suicide: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-28, August.
    14. Katarzyna Szczurek & Natalia Furgał & Dawid Szczepanek & Rashid Zaman & Krzysztof Krysta & Marek Krzystanek, 2021. "“Medical Student Syndrome”—A Myth or a Real Disease Entity? Cross-Sectional Study of Medical Students of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Rosa Giannina Castillo-Avila & Alma Delia Genis-Mendoza & Isela Esther Juárez-Rojop & María Lilia López-Narváez & Diana María Dionisio-García & Germán Alberto Nolasco-Rosales & Miguel Ángel Ramos-Ménd, 2022. "High Serum Levels of IL-6 Are Associated with Suicide Attempt but Not with High Lethality Suicide Attempts: A Preliminary Case–Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    16. Elias David Nino-Ruiz & Ana Maria Trejos-Herrera & Maria Yaquelin Exposito-Concepcion & Marjorie Rodriguez-Giraldo & Randy Steven Consuegra-Ortega & Claudia Guevara-Novoa, 2020. "A Simple Monte Carlo Framework to Assess Suicide Risk in Adolescents: A Study at a High School in Colombia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Gianluca Serafini & Valentina Maria Parisi & Andrea Aguglia & Andrea Amerio & Gaia Sampogna & Andrea Fiorillo & Maurizio Pompili & Mario Amore, 2020. "A Specific Inflammatory Profile Underlying Suicide Risk? Systematic Review of the Main Literature Findings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Katarzyna Orlewska & Pawel Orlewski & Justyna Klusek, 2021. "Suicide among Polish Adolescents—A 20 Year Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, March.
    19. Eloísa Guerrero-Barona & Mónica Guerrero-Molina & Maria José Chambel & Juan Manuel Moreno-Manso & Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo & Carlos Barbosa-Torres, 2021. "Suicidal Ideation and Mental Health: The Moderating Effect of Coping Strategies in the Police Force," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Silvana Maselli & Antonio del Casale & Elena Paoli & Maurizio Pompili & Sergio Garbarino, 2022. "Suicide Trends in the Italian State Police during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Comparison with the Pre-Pandemic Period," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:362-:d:1015400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.