IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p241-d1013248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Factors and Symbiotic Mechanism of the Integration of Medical Care and Disease Prevention during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Public Hospital Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Wu

    (School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Huiyi Tian

    (School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Dongjian Xu

    (School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Jiaying Chen

    (School of Public Administration, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Yaqi Hu

    (School of Public Administration, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Xiaohe Wang

    (School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Siyu Zhou

    (School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Yuhangtang St., Yuhang, Hangzhou 311121, China)

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak has accelerated the huge difference between medical care and disease prevention in Chinese medical institutions. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the symbiotic units, environments, models, and effects of the integration of medical care and disease prevention. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 762 employees of public hospitals in 11 cities in Zhejiang Province by random stratified sampling. We analyzed the influence paths of elements in the mechanism of integration of medical care and disease prevention and the mediating effect of symbiotic models among symbiotic units, symbiotic environments, and effects on this integration. Results: The path coefficient of the symbiotic unit on the symbiosis model was 0.46 ( p < 0.001), the path coefficient of the symbiotic environment on the symbiosis model was 0.52 ( p < 0.001). The path coefficient of the symbiotic unit and the environment was 0.91 ( p < 0.001). The symbiotic models exhibited a partial mediation effect between symbiotic units and the effect of this integration. Sobel test = 3.27, β = 0.152, and the mediating effect accounted for 34.6%. Conclusions: It is suggested that health policymakers and public hospital managers should provide sufficient symbiotic units, establish collaborative symbiotic models, and improve the effects of integration of medical care and disease prevention in public hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Wu & Huiyi Tian & Dongjian Xu & Jiaying Chen & Yaqi Hu & Xiaohe Wang & Siyu Zhou, 2022. "Influencing Factors and Symbiotic Mechanism of the Integration of Medical Care and Disease Prevention during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Public Hospital Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:241-:d:1013248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeong-hyun Kim & Seungbok Lee & Yun-hwan Lee & Jongbae Kim, 2021. "An Analysis of COVID-19 Global Guidelines Published in the Early Phase of the Pandemic for People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Lingli Peng & Karen Hammad, 2015. "Current status of emergency department triage in mainland China: A narrative review of the literature," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 148-158, June.
    3. AnneMarie Eijkelenboom & Marco A. Ortiz & Philomena M. Bluyssen, 2021. "Preferences for Indoor Environmental and Social Comfort of Outpatient Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic, an Explanatory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Frank Boons & Wouter Spekkink & Wenting Jiao, 2014. "A Process Perspective on Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 341-355, May.
    5. Doyeon Lee & Keunhwan Kim, 2022. "Public R&D Projects-Based Investment and Collaboration Framework for an Overarching South Korean National Strategy of Personalized Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kasper P.H. Lange & Gijsbert Korevaar & Inge F. Oskam & Paulien M. Herder, 2017. "Developing and Understanding Design Interventions in Relation to Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Rui Mu & Wouter Spekkink, 2018. "A Running Start or a Clean Slate? How a History of Cooperation Affects the Ability of Cities to Cooperate on Environmental Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Shiva Noori & Gijsbert Korevaar & Andrea Ramirez Ramirez, 2020. "Institutional Lens upon Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics: The case of Persian Gulf Mining and Metal Industries Special Economic Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    4. J. Rincón-Moreno & M. Ormazábal & C. Jaca, 2022. "Stakeholder Perspectives in Transitioning to a Local Circular Economy: a Case Study in Spain," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    5. Winans, K. & Kendall, A. & Deng, H., 2017. "The history and current applications of the circular economy concept," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 825-833.
    6. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    7. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    8. Emilia Faria & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Cristiane Barreto, 2021. "Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Petra Schneider & Lukas Folkens & Andreas Meyer & Tino Fauk, 2019. "Sustainability and Dimensions of a Nexus Approach in a Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    11. Jiao, Wenting & Boons, Frank, 2017. "Policy durability of Circular Economy in China: A process analysis of policy translation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 12-24.
    12. Mark Booker Nielsen & Rikke Lybæk & Tyge Kjær, 2022. "Successfully Navigating the Project Lifecycle for Deployment of Centralized Biogas Projects—The Case of Solrød Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Jacqueline M. Cramer, 2020. "Implementing the circular economy in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area: The interplay between market actors mediated by transition brokers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2857-2870, September.
    14. Hua Cui & Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté & Weifeng Liu, 2018. "Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis with a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Hai Hua Industrial Symbiosis, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Kaifang Zheng & Suling Jia, 2017. "Promoting the Opportunity Identification of Industrial Symbiosis: Agent-Based Modeling Inspired by Innovation Diffusion Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Haiyan Shan & Junliang Yang & Guo Wei, 2019. "Industrial Symbiosis Systems: Promoting Carbon Emission Reduction Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Tser-Yieth Chen & Chi-Jui Huang, 2019. "A Two-Tier Scenario Planning Model of Environmental Sustainability Policy in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Huijuan Dong & Zuoxi Liu & Yong Geng & Tsuyoshi Fujita & Minoru Fujii & Lu Sun & Liming Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating Environmental Performance of Industrial Park Development: The Case of Shenyang," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1402-1412, December.
    19. Shiva Noori & Gijsbert Korevaar & Rob Stikkelman & Andrea Ramírez, 2023. "Exploring the emergence of waste recovery and exchange in industrial clusters," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 937-950, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:241-:d:1013248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.