IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4429-d788575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Determinants of Vaccine Literacy in the Italian Population: Results from the Health Literacy Survey 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Cadeddu

    (Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Luca Regazzi

    (Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy)

  • Guglielmo Bonaccorsi

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Aldo Rosano

    (National Institute for the Analysis of Public Policy, 00198 Rome, Italy)

  • Brigid Unim

    (Department of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian National Institute of Health, 00162 Rome, Italy)

  • Robert Griebler

    (Competence Centre Health Promotion and Health System, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Thomas Link

    (Competence Centre Health Promotion and Health System, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Paola De Castro

    (Scientific Communication Unit, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Roberto D’Elia

    (Ministry of Health, Viale Giorgio Ribotta, 5, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Valeria Mastrilli

    (Ministry of Health, Viale Giorgio Ribotta, 5, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Luigi Palmieri

    (Department of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Italian National Institute of Health, 00162 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Vaccines are among the most important public health achievements of the last century; however, vaccine awareness and uptake still face significant challenges and the COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated this phenomenon. Vaccine Literacy (VL) is the ability to find, understand and judge immunisation-related information to make appropriate immunisation decisions. A cross-sectional study on a sample of 3500 participants, representative of the Italian adult population aged 18+ years, was conducted in Italy in 2021. A validated questionnaire, including sections on health literacy (HL), sociodemographic characteristics, risk factors, and lifestyles of respondents, was used. VL was measured by four items (item 19, 22, 26 and 29) of the HL section. While 67.6% of the respondents had a “good” (47.5%) or “sufficient” (20.1%) level of VL, 32.4% had “limited” VL levels. Although the overall VL level was quite high, many participants reported difficulties in dealing with vaccination information, particularly those with a lower educational level, those living in southern and insular regions of Italy, those with greater financial deprivation and those with a migration background. Improving VL in Italy should be a top priority in the political agenda, with special regard to socially and geographically disadvantaged communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Cadeddu & Luca Regazzi & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Aldo Rosano & Brigid Unim & Robert Griebler & Thomas Link & Paola De Castro & Roberto D’Elia & Valeria Mastrilli & Luigi Palmieri, 2022. "The Determinants of Vaccine Literacy in the Italian Population: Results from the Health Literacy Survey 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4429-:d:788575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4429/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4429/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivana Gusar & Suzana Konjevoda & Grozdana Babić & Dijana Hnatešen & Maja Čebohin & Rahela Orlandini & Boris Dželalija, 2021. "Pre-Vaccination COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy in a Croatian Adult Population: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Ariel Linden & Maya B. Mathur & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2020. "Conducting sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies using E-values: The evalue package," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 20(1), pages 162-175, March.
    3. Konstantinos Fotiadis & Katerina Dadouli & Ioanna Avakian & Zacharoula Bogogiannidou & Varvara A. Mouchtouri & Konstantinos Gogosis & Matthaios Speletas & Michalis Koureas & Eleni Lagoudaki & Sofia Ko, 2021. "Factors Associated with Healthcare Workers’ (HCWs) Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccinations and Indications of a Role Model towards Population Vaccinations from a Cross-Sectional Survey in Greece, May 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Shaojie Qi & Fengrui Hua & Shengyuan Xu & Zheng Zhou & Feng Liu, 2021. "Trends of global health literacy research (1995–2020): Analysis of mapping knowledge domains based on citation data mining," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-23, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessica K. Bone & Feifei Bu & Jill K. Sonke & Daisy Fancourt, 2024. "Leisure engagement in older age is related to objective and subjective experiences of aging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Mathur, Maya B & Smith, Louisa & Yoshida, Kazuki & Ding, Peng & VanderWeele, Tyler, 2021. "E-values for effect heterogeneity and conservative approximations for causal interaction," OSF Preprints h6pru, Center for Open Science.
    3. James N. Druckman & Samara Klar & Yanna Krupnikov & Matthew Levendusky & John Barry Ryan, 2021. "Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 28-38, January.
    4. Michelle Engelbrecht & Christo Heunis & Gladys Kigozi, 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Africa: Lessons for Future Pandemics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Yihui Li & Yi Guo & Xusheng Wu & Qingyuan Hu & Dehua Hu, 2022. "The Development and Preliminary Application of the Chinese Version of the COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Ngqabutho Moyo & Anita D. Bhappu & Moment Bhebhe & Farai Ncube, 2022. "Perceived Risk of COVID-19 and Employee Decision-Making: How Psychological Distress during the Pandemic Increases Negative Performance Outcomes among Healthcare Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Anna T. Ehmann & Eylem Ög & Monika A. Rieger & Achim Siegel, 2021. "Work-Related Health Literacy: A Scoping Review to Clarify the Concept," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Željko Pavić & Emma KovaÄ ević & Adrijana Å uljok & Juraj Jurlina & Maja MiÅ¡kulin & Aida Mujkić & Ivan MiÅ¡kulin, 2023. "The Deficit and Contextual Models of Vaccine Hesitancy: A Test of the Mediation Paths," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    9. Panagiotis Prezerakos & Katerina Dadouli & Eirini Agapidaki & Christina-Maria Kravvari & Ioanna Avakian & Athanasia-Marina Peristeri & Lemonia Anagnostopoulos & Varvara A. Mouchtouri & Konstantinos N., 2022. "Behavioral and Cultural Insights, a Nationwide Study Based on Repetitive Surveys of WHO Behavioral Insights Tool in Greece Regarding COVID-19 Pandemic and Vaccine Acceptance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Ioanna Avakian & Katerina Dadouli & Lemonia Anagnostopoulos & Konstantinos Fotiadis & Athanasios Lianos & Paraskevi Mina & Christos Hadjichristodoulou & Varvara A. Mouchtouri, 2023. "Nationwide Survey on Seasonal Influenza Vaccination among Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greece: Determinants, Barriers and Peculiarities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4429-:d:788575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.