IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2552-d756075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Pawlikowski

    (Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
    Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure Poland, BBMRI.pl Consortium, 54-066 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Michał Wiechetek

    (Institute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anita Majchrowska

    (Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Over the past few decades, there has been a dynamic development of biobanks collecting human biological material and data. Advances in biomedical research based on biobanks, however, are highly dependent on the successful enrolment and participation of human subjects. Therefore, it is crucial to recognise those factors affecting the willingness of individuals to participate in biomedical research. There are very few studies pointing to the role of trust, preferred values and specific psychological factors. The aim of our study was the analysis of the most significant relationships between selected moral and psychological variables (i.e., preferred values, types of trust and personality) and willingness to donate biological material to biobanks. The research was carried out on a Polish representative national sample of 1100 people over 18 years of age. Statistical methods with regression models were used during the analyses. The willingness to donate samples to a biobank was associated with different types of trust and specific values. Based on regression analysis, the most important factors related to the willingness to donate material to biobanks seemed to be (1) trust towards scientists and doctors and (2) selected preferred values such as knowledge, self-development and tradition. Other values or personality traits did not seem to be as important in this context. The obtained results can be useful in building the social responsibility of biobankers and scientists, issuing more appropriate opinions by research ethics committees and planning better communication strategies between participants and biobanks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Pawlikowski & Michał Wiechetek & Anita Majchrowska, 2022. "Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2552-:d:756075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Gaskell & Herbert Gottweis, 2011. "Biobanks need publicity," Nature, Nature, vol. 471(7337), pages 159-160, March.
    2. Jan Domaradzki & Jakub Pawlikowski, 2019. "Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiara Aleni & Carmela Rinaldi & Valentina Bettio & Eleonora Mazzucco & Annamaria Antona & Cristina Meini & Emiliano Loria & Paolo Bonvicini & Silvia Vittoria Cracas & Silvia Caristia & Antonio Rimedi, 2022. "Public Attitude towards Biobanking: An Italian University Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Jan Domaradzki & Jakub Pawlikowski, 2019. "Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Chen, Haidan, 2021. "Privacy in breast cancer biobank: Chinese patients’ perceptions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Abdelbaset Buhmeida & Mourad Assidi & Omar Alyazidi & Duaa Ibrahim Olwi & Ahmed Althuwaylimi & Fatimah M. Yahya & Leila Arfaoui & Leena Merdad & Adel Mohammad Abuzenadah, 2022. "Assessment of Biobanking Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biospecimen Donation among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Noor A A Giesbertz & Annelien L Bredenoord & Johannes J M van Delden, 2012. "Inclusion of Residual Tissue in Biobanks: Opt-In or Opt-Out?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-6, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2552-:d:756075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.