IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2191-d750155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Parent Engagement in a Web-Based Preventive Parenting Intervention for Child Mental Health in Predicting Parenting, Parent and Child Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Wan Hua Sim

    (Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia)

  • Anthony F. Jorm

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Marie B. H. Yap

    (Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
    Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

Although parents’ engagement in parenting programmes has frequently been posited to influence the efficacy and dissemination of these programmes, its relationship with intervention outcomes in parenting programmes is understudied. This study examined the predictive value of parental engagement on preventive parenting outcomes in a tailored online parenting programme aimed at enhancing parental protective factors and reducing risk factors for child depression and anxiety disorders. The present study also explored the associations between parental engagement and other parent, child and family outcomes. Data were collected from a community sample of 177 parents who received a tailored online parenting programme (‘Parenting Resilient Kids’; PaRK) and their children as part of a randomised controlled trial. Participants completed measures on parenting, child anxiety and depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life and family functioning on three occasions. Multiple regressions showed that parental engagement explained additional variance in preventive parenting (most proximal outcomes) at post-intervention and 12-month follow-up. Indicators of higher levels of parental engagement, operationalised by greater proportions of recommended programme modules and intended goals completed, uniquely predicted higher levels of preventing parenting. Higher levels of parental engagement also predicted higher levels of parental acceptance and parental psychosocial health-related quality of life, lower levels of parental psychological control and lower levels of impairments in child health-related quality of life. However, parental engagement did not explain additional variance in parent or child reported anxiety or depressive symptoms. This study provides support for the role of parental engagement in facilitating parenting changes in parenting-focused interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wan Hua Sim & Anthony F. Jorm & Marie B. H. Yap, 2022. "The Role of Parent Engagement in a Web-Based Preventive Parenting Intervention for Child Mental Health in Predicting Parenting, Parent and Child Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2191-:d:750155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grace Broomfield & Catherine Wade & Marie B. H. Yap, 2021. "Engaging Parents of Lower-Socioeconomic Positions in Internet- and Mobile-Based Interventions for Youth Mental Health: A Qualitative Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Braver, Sanford L. & Smith, Melanie C., 1996. "Maximizing both external and internal validity in longitudinal true experiments with voluntary treatments: The "combined modified" design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 287-300, November.
    3. Jeff Richardson & Angelo Iezzi & Munir Khan & Aimee Maxwell, 2014. "Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(1), pages 85-96, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corrigan, Patrick W. & Salzer, Mark S., 2003. "The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 109-121, May.
    2. Geke Romijn & Neeltje Batelaan & Jeroen Koning & Anton van Balkom & Aart de Leeuw & Friederike Benning & Leona Hakkaart van Roijen & Heleen Riper, 2021. "Acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of blended cognitive-behavioural therapy (bCBT) versus face-to-face CBT (ftfCBT) for anxiety disorders in specialised mental health care: A 15-week ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Julie A. Campbell & Douglas Ezzy & Amanda Neil & Martin Hensher & Alison Venn & Melanie J. Sharman & Andrew J. Palmer, 2018. "A qualitative investigation of the health economic impacts of bariatric surgery for obesity and implications for improved practice in health economics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(8), pages 1300-1318, August.
    4. Edward J. D. Webb & Paul Kind & David Meads & Adam Martin, 2021. "Does a health crisis change how we value health?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(10), pages 2547-2560, September.
    5. Sihem Dekhili & Mohamed Achabou, 2015. "The Influence of the Country-of-Origin Ecological Image on Ecolabelled Product Evaluation: An Experimental Approach to the Case of the European Ecolabel," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 89-106, September.
    6. Sarah Friedrich & Gerd Antes & Sigrid Behr & Harald Binder & Werner Brannath & Florian Dumpert & Katja Ickstadt & Hans A. Kestler & Johannes Lederer & Heinz Leitgöb & Markus Pauly & Ansgar Steland & A, 2022. "Is there a role for statistics in artificial intelligence?," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 16(4), pages 823-846, December.
    7. Luis Lassaletta & Miryam Calvino & Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado & Piotr Henryk Skarzynski & Katarzyna B. Cywka & Natalia Czajka & Justyna Kutyba & Dayse Tavora-Vieira & Paul van de Heyning & Griet Mertens , 2022. "Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Suparna Saha & Sanghamitra Basu & Debapratim Pandit, 2022. "Identifying Factors Influencing Perceived Quality of Life (QoL) of Indian Elderly: Case Study of Kolkata, India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 867-907, April.
    9. Alice Minghetti & Lars Donath & Henner Hanssen & Ralf Roth & Eric Lichtenstein & Lukas Zahner & Oliver Faude, 2022. "Physical Performance, Cardiovascular Health and Psychosocial Wellbeing in Older Adults Compared to Oldest-Old Residential Seniors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Lamu, Admassu N. & Olsen, Jan Abel, 2016. "The relative importance of health, income and social relations for subjective well-being: An integrative analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 176-185.
    11. Tom Lung & Kirsten Howard & Christopher Etherton-Beer & Moira Sim & Gill Lewin & Glenn Arendts, 2017. "Comparison of the HUI3 and the EQ-5D-3L in a nursing home setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-10, February.
    12. Lei Si & Liudan Tu & Ya Xie & Gang Chen & Mickaël Hiligsmann & Mingcan Yang & Yanli Zhang & Xi Zhang & Yutong Jiang & Qiujing Wei & Jieruo Gu & Andrew J. Palmer, 2022. "Evaluating Health Related Quality of Life in Older People at Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-6D," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 809-824, April.
    13. Admassu N. Lamu & Jan Abel Olsen, 2018. "Yes, health is important, but as much for its importance via social life: The direct and indirect effects of health on subjective well‐being in chronically ill individuals," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 209-222, January.
    14. Antonio Cuesta-Vargas & Jaime Martin-Martin & Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez & Jose Antonio Merchan-Baeza & David Perez-Cruzado, 2020. "Identification of Tools for the Functional and Subjective Assessment of Patients in an Aquatic Environment: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Tessa Peasgood & Clara Mukuria & Jill Carlton & Janice Connell & Nancy Devlin & Karen Jones & Rosemary Lovett & Bhash Naidoo & Stacey Rand & Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla & Donna Rowen & Aki Tsuchiya & J, 2021. "What is the best approach to adopt for identifying the domains for a new measure of health, social care and carer-related quality of life to measure quality-adjusted life years? Application to the dev," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(7), pages 1067-1081, September.
    16. Lina Braun & Yannik Terhorst & Ingrid Titzler & Johanna Freund & Janika Thielecke & David Daniel Ebert & Harald Baumeister, 2022. "Lessons Learned from an Attempted Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Improvement of Chronic Pain-Associated Disability in Green Professions: Long-Term Effectiveness of a Guided Online-Based Acc," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Luis Lassaletta & Miryam Calvino & Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado & Piotr Henryk Skarzynski & Katarzyna B. Cywka & Natalia Czajka & Justyna Kutyba & Dayse Tavora-Vieira & Paul Van de Heyning & Griet Mertens , 2023. "QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2191-:d:750155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.