IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1671-d740212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Systematic Workplace-Improvement Needs Generation (SWING): Verifying a Worker-Centred Tool for Identifying Necessary Workplace Improvements in a Nursing Home in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Tomoo Hidaka

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan)

  • Sei Sato

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan)

  • Shota Endo

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan)

  • Hideaki Kasuga

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan)

  • Yusuke Masuishi

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan)

  • Takeyasu Kakamu

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan)

  • Tetsuhito Fukushima

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan)

Abstract

This study developed and tested a new measurement instrument, the Systematic Workplace-Improvement Needs Generation (SWING), to identify workplace-improvement needs. The participants were 53 workers in a Japanese nursing home for the elderly. The respondents used the SWING questionnaire to self-generate five ‘cues’ they considered important to improve the workplace. The workers determined each cue’s sufficiency level and weight balance (importance), and then we summarised the 265 cues into 21 categories for workplace improvements. The respondents identified the following items as the most important and the least sufficiently provided areas for workplace improvement: ‘interaction with customers’, ‘physical and psychological harassment’, ‘rewarding and challenging work’, and ‘sharing goals and objectives’. Although the workplace-improvement recommendations differed greatly from person to person, SWING prioritised the items by weight (importance) and sufficiency (current status), allowing organisations to address the needed improvements systematically. The SWING tool effectively elicited and prioritised respondents’ recommendations for improving the workplace. Because its items are self-generated by the respondents, SWING can be used for any occupation or workplace. Visualisation with bubble plots to clarify the improvement needs is incorporated into SWING.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomoo Hidaka & Sei Sato & Shota Endo & Hideaki Kasuga & Yusuke Masuishi & Takeyasu Kakamu & Tetsuhito Fukushima, 2022. "The Systematic Workplace-Improvement Needs Generation (SWING): Verifying a Worker-Centred Tool for Identifying Necessary Workplace Improvements in a Nursing Home in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1671-:d:740212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuhyung Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Kyungdo Park & Hansol Hwang, 2020. "How Managers’ Job Crafting Reduces Turnover Intention: The Mediating Roles of Role Ambiguity and Emotional Exhaustion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Becton, J. Bret & Gilstrap, J. Bruce & Forsyth, Maurice, 2017. "Preventing and correcting workplace harassment: Guidelines for employers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 101-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose Perez-Larrazabal & Andrés Lopezdelallave & Gabiela Topa, 2019. "Organizational Tolerance for Workplace Harassment: Development and Validation of the POT Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Bobek Vito & Maček Anita & Bradler Sarah & Horvat Tatjana, 2018. "How to Reduce Discrimination in the Workplace: The Case of Austria and Taiwan (R.O.C.)," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 64(3), pages 12-22, September.
    3. Atwater, Leanne E. & Sturm, Rachel E. & Taylor, Scott N. & Tringale, Allison, 2021. "The era of #MeToo and what managers should do about it," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 307-318.
    4. Magdalena Kachniewska & Anna Para, 2023. "Feminine vs. Masculine: Expectations of Leadership Styles in Hotels during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Andrea Feher & Paul Nichita Cuc & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Dana Rad & Gavril Rad & Mioara Florina Pantea & Cosmin Silviu Raul Joldes, 2022. "A Parallel Mediation Analysis on the Effects of Pandemic Accentuated Occupational Stress on Hospitality Industry Staff Turnover Intentions in COVID-19 Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1671-:d:740212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.