IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1304-d732470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Fitter Children Better Assess Their Physical Activity with Questionnaire Than Less Fit Children?

Author

Listed:
  • Jerneja Premelč

    (Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Kaja Meh

    (Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Henri Vähä-Ypyä

    (UKK-Institute, 33500 Tampere, Finland)

  • Vedrana Sember

    (Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Gregor Jurak

    (Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Most physical activity (PA) questionnaires assess moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) describing the physical exertion of individuals that might be influenced by their physical fitness. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether fitter children could better assess their PA with the questionnaire than less fit children. The cross-sectional validation study was conducted with 108 children (60 girls) aged 11 to 14 years, who were divided into three fitness groups based on the results of the 600 m running test. To answer the research question, the agreement between their assessment of PA using the SHAPES questionnaire and the UKK RM42 accelerometer data was analysed. One quarter of the participants achieved at least 60 min of MVPA each day, measured by accelerometer. The average MVPA obtained was 97.8 ± 35.6 min per day, with the high fitness group having a significantly higher value compared with the other groups. Moderate to high validity coefficients were found in the high fitness group (Spearman’s ρ range 0.34–0.70). In contrast, the lower fitness groups had poor to moderate validity for all variables (Spearman’s ρ range 0.03–0.42). These results suggest that the fittest children self-assess their PA with the questionnaire better than less fit children, which may advance new directions for the development and evaluation of PA questionnaires and their usability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerneja Premelč & Kaja Meh & Henri Vähä-Ypyä & Vedrana Sember & Gregor Jurak, 2022. "Do Fitter Children Better Assess Their Physical Activity with Questionnaire Than Less Fit Children?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1304-:d:732470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Charles & David Thivel & Julien Verney & Laurie Isacco & Pauliina Husu & Henri Vähä-Ypyä & Tommi Vasankari & Michèle Tardieu & Alicia Fillon & Pauline Genin & Benjamin Larras & Bruno Chabanas & B, 2021. "Reliability and Validity of the ONAPS Physical Activity Questionnaire in Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in French Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alicia Fillon & Bruno Pereira & Jérémy Vanhelst & Joanna Baran & Julie Masurier & Terry Guirado & Yves Boirie & Martine Duclos & Valérie Julian & David Thivel, 2022. "Development of the Children and Adolescents Physical Activity and Sedentary Questionnaire (CAPAS-Q): Psychometric Validity and Clinical Interpretation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Kaja Meh & Vedrana Sember & Saša Đurić & Henri Vähä-Ypyä & Paulo Rocha & Gregor Jurak, 2021. "Reliability and Validity of Slovenian Versions of IPAQ-SF, GPAQ, and EHIS-PAQ for Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentarism of Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1304-:d:732470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.