IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16921-d1005475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Land Reclamation on Soil Bacterial Community and Potential Functions in Bauxite Mining Area

Author

Listed:
  • Xuesong Li

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Zhenjiang Jin

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Liyuan Xiong

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Lingchen Tong

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Hongying Zhu

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Xiaowen Zhang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Guangfa Qin

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

Studying the characteristics of microorganisms in mine reclamation sites can provide a scientific reference basis for mine land reclamation. Soils in the plough layer (0–20 cm) of the bauxite mine plots in Pingguo city, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, with different reclamation years were used as the research objects. The community structure of soil bacteria was analyzed with high-throughput sequencing technology. The results show the following: (1) Reclamation significantly increased the contents of soil nutrients ( p < 0.05). (2) The relative abundances of Proteobacteria were high (22.90~41.56%) in all plots, and reclamation significantly reduced the relative abundances of Firmicutes (3.42–10.77%) compared to that in the control plot (24.74%) ( p < 0.05). The relative abundances of α-proteobacteria generally increased while the reclamation year increased. The relative abundances of α-proteobacteria and γ-proteobacteria showed significant positive correlations with soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus nutrients ( p < 0.01). The relative abundance of Acidobacteria Group 6 showed significant positive correlations with soil exchangeable Ca and Mg ( p < 0.01). (3) Bacterial co-occurrence network showed more Copresence interactions in all plots (50.81–58.39%). The reclaimed plots had more nodes, higher modularity, and longer characteristic path length than the control plot, and the keystone taxa changed in different plots. (4) The chemoheterotrophy and aerobic chemoheterotrophy were the most abundant functional groups in all plots (35.66–48.26%), while reclamation reduced the relative abundance of fermentation groups (1.75–11.21%). The above findings indicated that reclamation improved soil nutrients, changed the bacterial community structure and potential functions, and accelerated the microbial stabilization of the reclaimed soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuesong Li & Zhenjiang Jin & Liyuan Xiong & Lingchen Tong & Hongying Zhu & Xiaowen Zhang & Guangfa Qin, 2022. "Effects of Land Reclamation on Soil Bacterial Community and Potential Functions in Bauxite Mining Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16921-:d:1005475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shan, Linan & He, Yunfeng & Chen, Jie & Huang, Qian & Lian, Xu & Wang, Hongcai & Liu, Yili, 2015. "Nitrogen surface runoff losses from a Chinese cabbage field under different nitrogen treatments in the Taihu Lake Basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 255-263.
    2. Lijia Zhang & Zhenqi Hu & Dazhi Yang & Huanhuan Li & Bo Liu & He Gao & Congjie Cao & Yan Zhou & Junfang Li & Shuchang Li, 2022. "Land Use Dynamic Evolution and Driving Factors of Typical Open-Pit Coal Mines in Inner Mongolia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Huanhao & Gao, Rong & Cui, Yuanlai & Gu, Shixiang, 2022. "A semi-empirical semi-process model of ammonia volatilization from paddy fields under different irrigation modes and urea application regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Shaowen Xie & Fen Yang & Hanxiao Feng & Zhenzhen Yu & Xinghu Wei & Chengshuai Liu & Chaoyang Wei, 2022. "Potential to Reduce Chemical Fertilizer Application in Tea Plantations at Various Spatial Scales," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Xiao Ma & Fen Zhang & Fabo Liu & Guangzheng Guo & Taihong Cheng & Junjie Wang & Yuanpeng Shen & Tao Liang & Xinping Chen & Xiaozhong Wang, 2022. "An Integrated Nitrogen Management Strategy Promotes Open-Field Pepper Yield, Crop Nitrogen Uptake, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Southwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Md Arifur Rahaman & Xiaoying Zhan & Qingwen Zhang & Shuqin Li & Shengmei Lv & Yuting Long & Hailing Zeng, 2020. "Ammonia Volatilization Reduced by Combined Application of Biogas Slurry and Chemical Fertilizer in Maize–Wheat Rotation System in North China Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Ya Shao & Qinxue Xu & Xi Wei, 2023. "Progress of Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Li, Yinkun & Wang, Lichun & Xue, Xuzhang & Guo, Wenzhong & Xu, Fan & Li, Youli & Sun, Weituo & Chen, Fei, 2017. "Comparison of drip fertigation and negative pressure fertigation on soil water dynamics and water use efficiency of greenhouse tomato grown in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Monika Tabak & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska, 2020. "Assessment of the Efficiency of Nitrogen Slow-Release Fertilizers in Integrated Production of Carrot Depending on Fertilization Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Si, Zhuanyun & Zain, Muhammad & Li, Shuang & Liu, Junming & Liang, Yueping & Gao, Yang & Duan, Aiwang, 2021. "Optimizing nitrogen application for drip-irrigated winter wheat using the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    9. Mengjing Guo & Tiegang Zhang & Jing Li & Zhanbin Li & Guoce Xu & Rui Yang, 2019. "Reducing Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses from Different Crop Types in the Water Source Area of the Danjiang River, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Tao Liang & Weilin Tao & Yan Wang & Na Zhou & Wei Hu & Tao Zhang & Dunxiu Liao & Xinping Chen & Xiaozhong Wang, 2023. "The Extension of Vegetable Production to High Altitudes Increases the Environmental Cost and Decreases Economic Benefits in Subtropical Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Hou, Xianghao & Xiang, Youzhen & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Hu, Wenhui & Yan, Fulai & Guo, Jinjin & Xiao, Chao & Li, Yuepeng & Cheng, Houliang & Li, Zhijun, 2021. "Evaluation of cotton N nutrition status based on critical N dilution curve, N uptake and residual under different drip fertigation regimes in Southern Xinjiang of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16921-:d:1005475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.