IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14150-d957359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Let Us Take It into Our Own Hands: Patient Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Baránková

    (Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, 821 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Katarína Greškovičová

    (Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, 821 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Bronislava Strnádelová

    (Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, 821 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Katarina Krizova

    (Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, 821 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Júlia Halamová

    (Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, 821 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced new health situations for patients and health professionals alike and, with them, opportunities to study these new patient experiences, gain insights into changed healthcare practices, and propose potential new healthcare solutions. The aim of our study was to explore how people coped with their health issues during the pandemic. We utilized a consensual qualitative analysis. The convenience sample that was gathered online through social media comprised 1683 participants with a mean age of 31.02 years (SD = 11.99). The 50 participants from the convenience sample who scored the highest on subscales of the COPE inventory were selected for in-depth interviews. In-depth interviews with 27 participants from the convenience sample who reported a health issue were analyzed. The final sample in our study therefore comprised 17 women (63%) and 10 men (37%) with a mean age of 28.35 years (SD = 9.31). The results showed that behavioral coping with health problems was mentioned across all participants’ accounts. However, participants facing a health issue during the COVID-19 pandemic mostly relied on their own self-help instead of on healthcare services. They utilized healthcare services only when absolutely necessary. Furthermore, the participants had two main sources of resilience: themselves and other people.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Baránková & Katarína Greškovičová & Bronislava Strnádelová & Katarina Krizova & Júlia Halamová, 2022. "Let Us Take It into Our Own Hands: Patient Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14150-:d:957359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romana Ulbrichtova & Viera Svihrova & Maria Tatarkova & Henrieta Hudeckova & Jan Svihra, 2021. "Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination among Healthcare and Non-Healthcare Workers of Hospitals and Outpatient Clinics in the Northern Region of Slovakia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Faraz Ahmed & Jenni Burt & Martin Roland, 2014. "Measuring Patient Experience: Concepts and Methods," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(3), pages 235-241, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Óscar Brito Fernandes & Petra Baji & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Armin Lucevic & Imre Boncz & Márta Péntek, 2019. "Patient experiences with outpatient care in Hungary: results of an online population survey," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 79-90, June.
    2. Li Cao & Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong & Edward B. McNeil, 2022. "The Association between mHealth App Use and Healthcare Satisfaction among Clients at Outpatient Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Study in Inner Mongolia, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Charlotte T. Lee & Susanne Phillips & Susan Tiso & Camille Fitzpatrick, 2019. "Exploring Interpersonal Relationships in a Nurse-Managed Clinic and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    4. Ngqabutho Moyo & Anita D. Bhappu & Moment Bhebhe & Farai Ncube, 2022. "Perceived Risk of COVID-19 and Employee Decision-Making: How Psychological Distress during the Pandemic Increases Negative Performance Outcomes among Healthcare Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Anne-Gaëlle Corroller & Julia Bonastre, 2023. "Patient-reported measures: how useful in health economics?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(1), pages 1-4, February.
    6. Andrea C Schöpf & Werner Vach & Marcel Jakob & Franziska Saxer, 2019. "Routine patient surveys: Patients’ preferences and information gained by healthcare providers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Joy Davis & Sue Sinni & Stephen Maloney & Lorraine Walker, 2022. "Strategies Australian Hospitals Utilize to Incorporate Patient Feedback in the Delivery and Measurement of Person-Centered Care: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(5), pages 782-794, June.
    8. Fernanda Manuela Loureiro & Ana Vanessa dos Reis Ameixa Antunes & Tiina Pelander & Zaida Borges Charepe, 2021. "The experience of school‐aged children with hospitalisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 550-558, February.
    9. Battsetseg Turbat & Bold Sharavyn & Feng-Jen Tsai, 2021. "Attitudes towards Mandatory Occupational Vaccination and Intention to Get COVID-19 Vaccine during the First Pandemic Wave among Mongolian Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Hyeon-Young Kim & Ji-Hye Lee & Eun-Hye Lee, 2021. "Virtual Experience of Perioperative Patients: Walking in the Patients’ Shoes Using Virtual Reality and Blended Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-12, June.
    11. Bishnu Bahadur Bajgain & Kalpana Thapa Bajgain & Sujan Badal & Fariba Aghajafari & Jeanette Jackson & Maria-Jose Santana, 2020. "Patient-Reported Experiences in Accessing Primary Healthcare among Immigrant Population in Canada: A Rapid Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14150-:d:957359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.