IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p13745-d950505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bibliometric Analysis of High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Author

Listed:
  • Haitao Liu

    (College of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China
    Research Center of Sports Reform and Development, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China
    Institute of Physical Fitness and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Feiyue Liu

    (College of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Haoyuan Ji

    (College of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China)

  • Zuanqin Dai

    (College of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China)

  • Wenxiu Han

    (College of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China)

Abstract

As global quality of life has improved, the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases have gradually increased in prevalence. People have consequently sought to improve their health through physical exercise. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) tool that has been of great interest for several years. However, its feasibility and safety remain controversial. This study aimed to explore hot research topics and new directions regarding the role of HIIT in CR and to describe the dynamic development of the field. We used the Web of Science Core Collection database to develop visualizations using CiteSpace software (v.6.1.R2). The number of articles published, institutional collaboration networks, author partnerships, and keyword co-occurrence and clustering were used to analyze the impact of HIIT on CR. Our results showed that Norway, Canada, and the United States were the most prominent contributors to this field. Articles by Nigam, A and Juneau, M had the highest number of citations. The Norwegian University of Science and Technology had performed the most in-depth research in this area. The European Journal of Preventive Cardiology had published the most articles. The United States had the highest number of publishing journals. Relevant issues focused on coronary artery disease, exercise capacity, heart failure, cardiorespiratory fitness, and physical activity. HIIT in heart transplantation may be at the forefront of research in this field and future studies should focus on this topic. HIIT-based CR can therefore improve the exercise capacity and quality of life of cardiovascular patients and improve patient compliance in a safe manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Haitao Liu & Feiyue Liu & Haoyuan Ji & Zuanqin Dai & Wenxiu Han, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13745-:d:950505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/13745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meen Chul Kim & Chaomei Chen, 2015. "A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(1), pages 239-263, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oleh Pasko & Mykola Hordiyenko & Fuli Chen & Yarmila Tkal & Yulia Abraham, 2021. "Mapping Global Research on International Financial Reporting Standards: A Scientometric Review," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 116-134, May.
    2. Mohammad Rabiei & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh & Abdorrahman Haeri, 2017. "Using text mining techniques for identifying research gaps and priorities: a case study of the environmental science in Iran," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 815-842, February.
    3. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.
    4. Carlos Olmeda-Gómez & Maria-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones & Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, 2017. "Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 195-217, October.
    5. Yu, Dejian & Xu, Chao, 2017. "Mapping research on carbon emissions trading: a co-citation analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1314-1322.
    6. Hsia-Ching Chang, 2016. "The Synergy of Scientometric Analysis and Knowledge Mapping with Topic Models: Modelling the Development Trajectories of Information Security and Cyber-Security Research," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-33, December.
    7. Marie Katsurai & Shunsuke Ono, 2019. "TrendNets: mapping emerging research trends from dynamic co-word networks via sparse representation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1583-1598, December.
    8. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    9. Francisco Diez-Martin & Alicia Blanco-Gonzalez & Camilo Prado-Roman, 2019. "Research Challenges in Digital Marketing: Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, May.
    10. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1043, May.
    11. Mauricio Marrone, 2020. "Application of entity linking to identify research fronts and trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 357-379, January.
    12. Robertson, Jeandri & Pitt, Leyland & Ferreira, Caitlin, 2020. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the public sector: A bibliographic analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Chao Zhang & Jiancheng Guan, 2017. "How to identify metaknowledge trends and features in a certain research field? Evidences from innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1177-1197, November.
    14. Zheng-Dong Li & Bei Zhang, 2023. "Family-friendly policy evolution: a bibliometric study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Danielle H. Lee, 2019. "Predictive power of conference-related factors on citation rates of conference papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 281-304, January.
    16. Chanwoo Jeong & Sion Jang & Eunjeong Park & Sungchul Choi, 2020. "A context-aware citation recommendation model with BERT and graph convolutional networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 1907-1922, September.
    17. Hale Turhan Damar & Ozlem Bilik & Guzin Ozdagoglu & Askin Ozdagoglu & Muhammet Damar, 2018. "Evaluating the nursing academicians in Turkey in the scope of Web of Science: scientometrics of original articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 539-562, April.
    18. Jianhua Hou & Xiucai Yang & Chaomei Chen, 2018. "Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 869-892, May.
    19. Dejian Yu & Zeshui Xu & Wanru Wang, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making (2002–2017)," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 371-397, September.
    20. Meen Chul Kim & Yongjun Zhu & Chaomei Chen, 2016. "How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 123-165, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:13745-:d:950505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.